Abstract
This chapter is dedicated to the stochastic term of the Fokker-Planck equation in the modeling of dynamics in psychotherapy. We define stochastic interventions as ways to utilize sources of random fluctuations, either by augmenting or reducing stochastic inputs. We find that on top of the intrinsic stochasticity of state variables, a major source of such inputs stems from the environment of therapy systems and can thus be modified by boundary regulations and filtering of noise. Boundary regulation can bear on the social environment of a client, e.g., by a warding-off of social stimuli by milieu therapy, hospitalization, and retreats or by reducing the permeability of family subsystem boundaries. Mental processes may also be subject to intrusions of stochastic emotional and cognitive inputs, and there are interventions that can upregulate (e.g., free association) or downregulate (e.g., mindfulness, relaxation) such inputs. We find that all stochastic interventions also have deterministic functions because in therapy they follow a beneficial goal. In an overview of all types of intervention, we illustrate how the traditional distinction of common factors versus specific techniques relates to the Fokker-Planck model with its deterministic, contextual, and stochastic interventions. We also summarize to which degree these interventions are expressed in the four different clusters of psychotherapy modalities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). Measuring mindfulness: First steps towards a comprehensive mindfulness scale. Mindfulness, 4, 18–32.
Ciompi, L., & Hoffmann, H. (2004). Soteria Berne - An innovative milieu therapeutic approach to acute schizophrenia based on the concept of affect-logic. World Psychiatry, 3, 140–146.
de Shazer, S. (1991). Putting difference to work. New York, NY: Norton.
Delgadillo, J., Saxon, D. H., & Barkham, M. (2018). Associations between therapists’ occupational burnout and their patients’ depression and anxiety treatment outcomes. Depression and Anxiety, 35, 844. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22766
Haken, H., & Tschacher, W. (2017). How to modify psychopathological states? Hypotheses based on complex systems theory. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 21, 19–34.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Pfammatter, M., & Tschacher, W. (2016). Klassen allgemeiner Wirkfaktoren der Psychotherapie und ihr Zusammenhang mit Therapietechniken. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 45, 1–13.
Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007). Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 1–15.
Tschacher, W., Junghan, U., & Pfammatter, M. (2014). Towards a taxonomy of common factors in psychotherapy – Results of an expert survey. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21, 82–96.
Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14, 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238
Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: Model, methods, and findings (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tschacher, W., Haken, H. (2019). Application to Psychotherapy: Chance Interventions. In: The Process of Psychotherapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12748-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12748-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12747-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12748-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)