Abstract
Theoretical integration of the fast-accumulating literature in the substance abuse field has been sadly lacking. Most theories have been developed from a single perspective or level of analysis, and in many cases they were inconsistent with data from other approaches on the day the theory was published. For example, Peele (1981) reviewed several theoretical approaches that emphasized that a complete “answer” to substance abuse problems was to be found by analysis of genetic or biochemical factors alone. As Peele showed, these analyses completely ignored other data that clearly indicated the importance of environmental and psychosocial factors. Yet in the same paper, Peele proposed a theoretical approach that denied the importance of any biological factors! To illustrate the current lack of integration in the field, consider again the recent edited collection on drug abuse theory (Lettieri, Sayers, & Pearson, 1980) that included over 40 completely distinct theories. Particularly noteworthy in the Lettieri et al. collection was that most of the theories tended to incorporate only a narrow band of data, and their generalizability beyond a highly limited domain appeared poor. Clearly, there is a need for theoretical integration in the substance abuse field, and a careful inspection of the preceding chapters should convince the reader that such integration will require a model that incorporates factors from several disciplines: in short, a “biopsychosocial” model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ewing, J. A. Biopsychosocial approaches to drinking and alcoholism. In W. E. Fann, 1. Karacan, A. D. Pokorny, and. R. L. Williams (Eds.), Phenomenology and Treatment of Alcoholism. New York: Spectrum, 1980.
Lettieri, D. J., Sayers, M., and, Pearson, H. W. (Eds.). Theories on Drug Abuse: Selected Contemporary Perspectives (NIDA Research Monograph 30). Rockville, Md.: National Institute of Drug Abuse.
Moos, R. H., and. Finney, J. W. The expanding scope of alcoholism treatment evaluation. American Psychologist, 1983, 38, 1036–1044.
Peele, S. Reductionism in the psychology of the eighties: Can biochemistry eliminate addiction, mental illness, and pain? American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 807–818.
Peterson, J. Segal, B. and. Heasley, R. Perception of alcohol and alcoholism among Alaskan communities. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 1979, 25, 31–35.
Schwartz, G. E. Testing the biopsychosocial model: The ultimate challenge facing behavioral medicine. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982, 50, 1040–1053.
Schaefer, J. M. Firewater myths revisited: Review of findings and some new directions. Journal of Studies on Alcohol,1981, Supplement #9, 99–117.
Segal, B. Alcohol and alcoholism in Alaska: Research in a multicultural and transitional society. The International Journal of Addictions, 1983, 18, 379–392.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galizio, M., Maisto, S.A. (1985). Toward a Biopsychosocial Theory of Substance Abuse. In: Galizio, M., Maisto, S.A. (eds) Determinants of Substance Abuse. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9990-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9990-3_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9992-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9990-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive