Abstract
Perhaps as much as any other natural human activity, reading is a very complex process. Those of us who take an analytic attitude toward reading tend to think of it as a process that emerges from several simpler component information processing activities. We speak of the processes that control the movements of the eyes, guiding them to the the successive points of fixation in the text, and of the processes of letter and word identification. Some researchers stress the importance of phonological encoding processes, and syntactic processes are obviously important. Finally, we speak of the semantic processes that result in the comprehension of what is read, integrating the incoming information with information already stored in the reader’s memory. An analytic approach may be necessary if we are to make progress toward an understanding of the reading process. At the same time, however, we should not lose sight of the fact that reading is not merely the concatenation of the components into which we divide it for the sake of analysis. In the fluent reader, it is clear that the components are all highly interdependent (Rumelhart, 1977).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Firth, I. Components of reading disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Kensington, N. S. W., Australia, 1972.
Szumski, J. The effects of specific visual experience on rapid visual word identification. Unpublished masters thesis, McMaster University, 1974.
Jackson, M, & McClelland, J. Processing determinants of reading speed. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1977.
References
Baron, J. Phonemic stage not necessary in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 23, 241–246.
Calfee, R., Venezky, R., & Chapman, R. Pronunciation of synthetic words with predictable and unpredictable letter-sound correspondences (Technical report 71 ). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, 1969.
Chall, J. Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Frederiksen, J. R. Assessment of perceptual decoding and lexical skills and their relation to reading proficiency. In this volume.
Frederiksen, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976, 2, 361–379.
Gilbert, L. Speed of processing visual stimuli and its relation to reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1959, 55, 8–14.
Höffding, H. Outlines of psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1891.
Huey, E. B. The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan, 1908; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968.
Hunt, E., Lunneborg, C., & Lewis, J. What does it mean to be high verbal? Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 194–227.
Jackson, M., & McClelland, J. Sensory and cognitive determinants of reading speed. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975, 14, 565–574.
Kleiman, G. Speech recoding in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975, 14, 323–340.
Levy, B. Vocalization and suppression effects in sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975, 14, 304–316.
Levy, B. Speech processing during reading. In this volume.
Mason, M., & Katz, L. Visual processing of nonlinguistic strings: Redundancy effects and reading ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1976, 105, 338–348.
Perfetti, C., & Lesgold, A. Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In M. Just & P. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., in press.
Posner, M., Boies, S., Eichelman,, W., & Taylor, R. Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 1969, 79,(1), part 2.
Rumelhart, D. E. Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1977.
Tinker, M. A. Basis for effective reading. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1965.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McClelland, J.L., Jackson, M.D. (1978). Studying Individual Differences in Reading. In: Lesgold, A.M., Pellegrino, J.W., Fokkema, S.D., Glaser, R. (eds) Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. Nato Conference Series, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2535-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2535-2_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2537-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2535-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive