Abstract
The chapter reports further sparse evidence favouring the WAT theory showing that linguistic information plays a major role for the representation of abstract concepts. We start illustrating a computational linguistic study that indicates that a rich linguistic context is more relevant for abstract than for concrete concepts (Recchia and Jones 2012). We then turn to the analysis of examples taken from the Italian Sign Language (LIS) that shows that for signs referring to abstract concepts (e.g., “literature,” “philosophy,” and “truth”), strategies based on the exploitation of language such as initialization are used (Gianfreda et al. in press; Borghi et al., submitted). The larger part of the chapter is dedicated to the review of cross-linguistic studies. The aim of this review is to provide support to one of the main tenets of the WAT proposal, i.e., the hypothesis that abstract concepts are more influenced by linguistic variability. The analysis takes into account concepts that can be considered as progressively more abstract: it starts with studies on concrete objects as containers, then it focuses on motion and locomotion verbs, on spatial relations, and then it turns to studies on abstract entities such as “time” and “number,” and on abstract verbs such as mental states verbs. The evidence reported suggests indeed that the differences between different languages influence more conceptual representation of abstract concepts than of concrete ones.
Are our own concepts of ‘time,’ ‘space,’ and ‘matter’ given in substantially the same form by experience to all men, or are they in part conditioned by the structure of particular languages?
Whorf 1939/2000, p. 138
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 129–163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bonato, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2012). When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Review, 36(10), 2257–2273.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.
Boroditsky, L., & Prinz, J. (2008). What thoughts are made of. In G. Semin & E. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2003). Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 387–427). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Capirci, O., Cattani, A., Rossini, P., & Volterra, V. (1998). Teaching sign language to hearing children as a possible factor in cognitive enhancement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3(2), 135–142.
Casasanto, D. (2008). Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58, 63–79.
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593.
Chen, J. Y. (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure to replicate Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104, 127–136.
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.
Choi, S., McDonough, L., Bowerman, M., & Mandler, J. M. (1999). Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean. Cognitive Development, 14, 241–268.
Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: Spatial–numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 260. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
Fischer, M. H., Kaufmann, L., & Domahs, F. (2012). Finger counting and numerical cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 108. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00108
Flumini, A., & Santiago, J. (2013). Time (also) flies from left to right if it is needed! In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachmuz (Eds.), In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2315–2320). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Mental time-lines follow writing direction: Comparing English and Hebrew speakers. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1001–1007). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2004). Language and the origin of numerical concept. Science, 306, 441–443.
Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496–499.
Gennari, S., Sloman, S., Malt, B. C., & Tecumseh Fitch, W. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83(1), 49–79.
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 215–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gianfreda, G. (2011). Analisi conversazionale e indicatori linguistici percettivi e cognitivi nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). PhD dissertation, University of Macerata.
Gianfreda, G., Volterra, V., & Zuczkowski, A. (in press). L’espressione dell’incertezza nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). Ricerche di pedagogia e didattica.
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73(2), 135–176.
Goddard, C. (2003). Thinking across languages and cultures six dimensions of variations. Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2-3), 109–140.
Goddard, C. (2010). Universals and variation in the lexicon of the mental state concepts. In B. C. Malt & P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind how words capture human experience (pp. 72–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lupyan, G. (2012). What do words do? Toward a theory of language-augmented thought. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, (Vol. 57, pp. 255–297). New York: Academic Press.
Malt, B., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A. (2008). Talking about walking biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science, 19, 232–240.
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y. (1999). Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(2), 230–262.
Malt, B. C., & Wolff, P. (2010). Words and the mind. How words capture new experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Malt, B., Gennari, S., & Imai, M. (2010). Lexicalization patterns and the world to words mapping. In B. C. Malt & P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind. How words capture new experience (pp. 29–57). New York: Oxford University Press.
Marques, F. J., & Nunes, L. D. (2012). The contribution of language and experience to the representation of abstract and concrete words: Different weights but similar organization. Memory and Cognition, 40(8), 1266–1275.
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547–559.
Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450.
Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Israeli, Z., & Gabay, S. (2010). Is the future the right time? Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 308–314.
Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499–501.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Recchia, G., & Jones, M. N. (2012). The semantic richness of abstract concepts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 315. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00315
Roversi, C., Borghi, A. M., & Tummolini, L. (2013). A marriage is an artefact and not a walk that we take together: An experimental study on the categorization of artefacts. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 527–542.
Roush, D. R. (2011). Language between bodies: A cognitive approach to understanding linguistic politeness in American sign language. Sign Language Studies, 11(3), 329–374.
Russo, P. (2005). A crosslinguistic, cross-cultural analysis of metaphors. Sign Language Studies, 5, 333–359.
Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 512–516.
Santiago, J., Román, A., & Ouellet, M. (2011). Flexible foundations of abstract thought: A review and a theory. In A. Maass & T. W. Schubert (Eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 41–110). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sell, A. J., & Kaschak, M. P. (2011). Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses. Brain and Language, 117, 39–44.
Slobin, D. (1987). Thinking for speaking. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 13, 435–445.
Slobin, D. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fridman, A. (2001). Categorization versus similarity: The case of container names. In U. Hahn & M. Ramscar (Eds.), Similarity and categorization (pp. 73–86). New York: Oxford University Press.
Volterra, V. (1987, new edition 2004). La lingua Italiana dei segni (LIS). Bologna: Il Mulino.
Whorf, B. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Whorf, B. L. (2000). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 134–159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1939).
Wu, L. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica, 132, 173–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borghi, A.M., Binkofski, F. (2014). Language, Languages, and Abstract Concepts. In: Words as Social Tools: An Embodied View on Abstract Concepts. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9539-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9539-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9538-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9539-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)