Skip to main content

Using the Comprehensive Executive Function Inventory (CEFI) to Assess Executive Function: From Theory to Application

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Executive Functioning

Abstract

Interest in measuring variables that might explain the difference between children’s ability and knowledge and their actual performance in the classroom on tests or on the playground has been of increasing interest to researchers, educators, psychologists, and mental health professionals (Goldstein & Naglieri, 2013). Increasingly, evaluators are focused upon explaining the processes and abilities that facilitate acquisition of knowledge. Interest in the mental application of human brain behavior relationships has, to a significant degree, driven interest in phenomena like executive function. Nonetheless, this concept is in a relatively early stage of development (McCloskey, Perkins, & Van Divner, 2009). As in all areas of science, what is discovered depends upon the quality of the instruments used and the information provided. Thus, as interest in executive function and its impact upon children’s development has grown, so has an interest in developing valid and reliable instruments. The better the assessment tool, the more valid and reliable decisions made, the more useful information obtained, ultimately greater benefit derived by children in need.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi, H. (2010). Congruence: Congruence coefficient, RV coefficient, and mantel coefficient. In N. J. Salkind, D. M. Dougherty, & B. Frey (Eds.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 222–229). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Jones, L. L. (2009). Executive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates. Developmental Review, 29, 180–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 327–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4–13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2037–2078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Miller, E. K. (2002). Cognitive focusing through adaptive neural coding in the primate prefrontal cortex. In D. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 278–291). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. J., Bird, G., Brindley, R., Frith, C. D., & Burgess, P. W. (2008). Atypical recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex in autism spectrum disorders: An fMRI study of two executive function tasks. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2281–2291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Behavior rating inventory of executive function: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. (2013). The science of intelligence testing: Commentary on the evolving nature of interpretations of the Wechsler scales. Journal of Psychoeducaitonal Assessment, 31, 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, S. C., Isquith, P. K., & Gioia, G. A. (2004). Behavior rating inventory of executive function: Self report version. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • HappĂ©, F., Booth, R., Charlton, R., & Hughes, C. (2006). Executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Examining profiles across domains and ages. Brain and Cognition, 61, 25–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herba, C. M., Tranah, T., Rubia, K., & Yule, W. (2006). Conduct problems in adolescence: Three domains of inhibition and effect of gender. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30, 659–695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. S. (2001). Clinical equivalence: A step, a misstep, or just a misnomer? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 436–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurado, M. B., & Rosselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychology Review, 17, 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Devereux early childhood assessment clinical form (DECA-C). Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, G., Perkins, L. A., & Van Divner, B. (2009). Assessment and intervention for executive function difficulties. School-based practice in action series. New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wagner, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. B., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2000). A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 113–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller, U., Lieberman, D., Frye, D., & Zelazo, P. D. (2008). Executive function, school readiness, and school achievement. In S. K. Thurman & C. A. Fiorello (Eds.), Applied cognitive research in K-3 classrooms (pp. 41–84). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. (2000). Can profile analysis of ability test scores work? An illustration using the PASS theory and CAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. (2011). The discrepancy/consistency approach to SLD identification using the PASS theory. In D. P. Flanagan & V. C. Alfonso (Eds.), Essentials of specific learning disability identification (pp. 145–172). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Goldstein, S. (2011). Assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological processes. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Understanding and managing learning disabilities and ADHD in late adolescence and adulthood (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Goldstein, S. (2013). Comprehensive Executive Functioning Index. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive assessment system. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., Das, J. P., & Goldstein, S. (2013). Cognitive assessment system—Second edition. Austin, TX: ProEd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Goldstein, S. (2013). Evaluation and treatment effectiveness in the field of autism: Psychometric considerations and an illustration, in S. Goldstein and J.A. Naglieri handbook of autism treatment. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Gottling, S. H. (1995). A cognitive education approach to math instruction for the learning disabled: An individual study. Psychological Reports, 76, 1343–1354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., LeBuffe, P. A., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (1994). Devereux scales of mental disorders. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., McNeish, T. J., & Bardos, A. N. (1991). Draw a person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance. Austin, TX: ProEd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Otero, T. M. (2012). The cognitive assessment system: From theory to practice. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment, third edition: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 376–399). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Pickering, E. B. (2010). Helping children learn. Intervention handouts for use in school and at home (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogles, B. M., Lunnen, K. M., & Bonesteel, K. (2001). Clinical significance: History, application, and current practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 421–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raiche, G., & Magis, D. (2010). nFactors: Parallel analysis and non graphical solutions to the Cattell Scree Test. R package version 2.3.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nFactors

  • Revelle, W. (2011). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston. R. package version 1.1.12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure: An alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1992). BASC: Behavioral assessment system for children. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeh, S. S., Burns, M. K., & Sullivan, A. L. (2012). Examining an Executive Function Rating Scale as a predictor of achievement in children at risk for behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 27, 236–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum-Gori, S. L., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Assessing the unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using multiple criteria from factor analysis. Social Indicators Research, 102, 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M., Ozonoff, S. J., Ursu, S., Ravizza, S., Cummings, N., Ly, S., et al. (2009). The neural substrates of cognitive control deficits in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2515–2526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F., Eaton, C. A., & Fava, J. L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41–72). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—4th edition (WISC-IV®). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyandt, L. L., Willis, W. G., Swentosky, A., Wilson, K., Janusis, G. M., & Marshall, S. (in press). A review of the use of executive function tasks in externalizing and internalizing disorders. In S. Goldstein, & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of executive functioning. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44, 575–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1336–1346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., & MĂĽller, U. (2002). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 445–469). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack A. Naglieri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naglieri, J.A., Goldstein, S. (2014). Using the Comprehensive Executive Function Inventory (CEFI) to Assess Executive Function: From Theory to Application. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J. (eds) Handbook of Executive Functioning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8106-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics