Skip to main content

Affective Characteristics in School and Corporate Environments: Their Conceptual Definitions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Instrument Development in the Affective Domain

Abstract

The importance of the affective domain in school and corporate environments is discussed. The research literature supporting the theoretical base and importance of the following affective characteristics is presented: attitudes, self-efficacy, values, self-concept, and interests. Allport’s (1935) early work identifying attitudes as “the most distinctive and indispensable concept in contemporary social psychology” (p. 798), defined an attitude as “a mental and neural state of readiness, organized through experience, exerting a directive or dynamic influence upon the individual’s response to all objects and situations with which it is related” (Allport 1935, p. 810) is presented. Of all the constructs described in this chapter, self-efficacy is perhaps the most important: it connects human motivation, thought processes, and behavior. As discussed by Bandura (1989), social cognitive theory recognizes the social origins of our thoughts and actions and the important role that cognition and thought play in human motivation, affect, and action. Rokeach’s (1973) extensive work with the construct of values is presented in which he clarifies the difference between an attitude and a value by stating that an attitude refers to an organization of several beliefs around a specific object or situation, whereas a value refers to a simple belief of a very specific kind. Aiken’s work is reviewed, which refers to a value as “the importance or worth attached to particular activities and objects” (Aiken 1980, p. 2). Coopersmith’s work (1967, 1989) with self-concept or self-esteem is reviewed, where he referred to “the evaluation which the individual makes and customarily maintains with regard to himself; it expresses an attitude of approval or disapproval, and indicates the extent to which the individual believes himself to be capable, significant, successful, and worthy” (Coopersmith 1967, pp. 4–5). The early work of Strong and Kuder, where interests were defined as “preferences for particular work activities” (Nunnally and Bernstein 1994), is reviewed. Sample instruments developed to measure each of the constructs are identified.

Measure what can be measured, and make measurable what cannot be measured.

Galilleo

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors are indebted to Anderson and Bourke (2000) for providing a clear perspective on the conceptual and operational definition of affective characteristics. Their insights greatly influenced our perspective as we crafted this chapter.

  2. 2.

    Although our collective work has been done in school and corporate settings, the research that we present in this chapter and the process that we outline for measuring affective characteristics in the remainder of the book can certainly be applied in other organizational settings as well as in psychological and behavioral research.

References

  • Adelson, J. L., & McCoach, D. (2011). Development and psychometric properties of the math and me survey: Measuring third through sixth graders’ attitudes toward mathematics. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44, 225–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. R. (1980). Attitude measurement and research. In D. A. Payne (Ed.), Recent developments in affective measurement (pp. 1–24). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, M. K. (1999). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., & Bourke, S. F. (2000). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. A. Y., & Hirsh, P. M. (1983). Ambushes, shootouts, and knights of the roundtable: The language of corporate takeovers. In L. R. Pondy, P. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982a). The assessment and predictive generality of self-precepts of efficacy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13(3), 195–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982b). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 22–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989a). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989b). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307–337). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206–1222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S., & Gable, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and post-secondary first-term student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New England Educational Research Organization, Portsmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, T. H. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform (report of the national commission on excellence in education). Education Week (April 27), pp. 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggiano, A. K., & Pittman, T. S. (1992). Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391–417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M., Fedor, D. B., & Rowland, K. M. (1982). Myth making: A qualitative step in OD interventions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady-Amoon, P., & Fuertes, J. N. (2011). Self-efficacy, self-rated abilities, adjustment, and academic performance. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89, 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1990). Methodological approaches to the validation of academic self-concept: The construct and its measures. Applied Measurement in Education, 3, 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A. (1991). Meaning and measurement of turnover: Comparison of alternative measures and recommendations for research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835–847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coopersmith, S. (1967, 1989). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breath self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, R. J. (1988). The values scale by Dorothy D. Nevill & Donald E. Super. Journal of Employment Counseling, 25, 136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Ally & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Special issue: What is an attitude? Social Cognition, 25(5), 582–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, S. M., & MacDonald, S. (2007). Using past performance, proxy efficacy, and academic self-efficacy to predict college performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2518–2531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erford, B. T., Ducan, K., & Savin-Murphy, J. (2010). brief psychometric analysis of the self-efficacy teacher report scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. D., & Locke, E. A. (1992). The new look in job satisfaction research and theory. In C. J. Cranny, P. C. Smith, & E. F. Stone (Eds.), Job satisfaction. New York: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, W. H. (1965). A manual for the Tennessee self-concept scale. Nashville: Counselor Recordings and Tests.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froman, R. D., & Owen, S. V. (1991). High school students’ perceived self-efficacy in physical and mental health. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6(2), 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W. (1966). The problem of interests: A recommendation. In H. A. Robinson (Ed.), Reading: Seventy-five years of progress. Supplementary Monographs, (Vol. 66, pp. 97–106).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12, 472–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, M. (1992). The impact of feedback and follow-up on leadership effectiveness (Report No. 17). La Jolla: Goldsmith & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. V. (1960). SRA manual for survey of interpersonal values. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1989). Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1985). The self-perception profile for children: revision of the perceived competence scale for children. Denver: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior, review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 151–177). California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, B. J., & Gable, R. K. (1989). School Situation Survey Manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, The Mindgarden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. (1991). The relationship of self-efficacy appraisals to subsequent health-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Work in Health Care, 16, 53–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, G. (1987). Self-efficacious control over reported physiological, cognitive and behavioural symptoms of dental anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25, 341–347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, W. B., & Wynne, R. (1996). Telework: Penetration, potential and practice in Europe. Amsterdam: Ohmsha Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. (1964). A taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook II: The affective domain. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (2012). Relationship of personal and organizational values with job satisfaction. Journal of Management Research, 12(2), 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt, T., Duyar, I., & Calik, T. (2012). Are we legitimate yet? A closer look at the causal relationship mechanisms among principal leadership, teacher self-efficacy and collective efficacy. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1979). Application of social learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), Essentials of school leadership (pp. 31–43). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., Jantzi, D., & Dart, B. (1991). How the school improvement strategies of transformational leaders foster teacher development. Paper presented at the Teacher Development Conference, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindia, S. A. (1992). Effects of a computer-intensive program on self-efficacy, sex-role socialization, and attitudes toward computers with sixth-grade students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., & Hanges, P. J. (1987). A control system model of organizational motivation: Theoretical development and applied implications. Behavioral Science, 32, 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, M. R. (1980). A cultural perspective on organizations: The need for and consequences of viewing organizations as culture-bearing milieu. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management, Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntosh, E., & Walker, M. (2012). Chronicling the transient nature of fitness employees: An organizational culture perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 26, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madlock, P. E., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2012). The influence of relational maintenance strategies among coworkers. Journal of Business Communication, 49(1), 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1992a). Self-description questionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New South Wales: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1992b). Self description questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept. A test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New South Wales: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 59–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathisen, G. E. (2011). Organizational antecedents of creative self-efficacy. Creativity and Innovative Management, 20(3), 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayew, W. J., & Venkatachalam, M. (2012). The power of voice: Managerial affective states and future firm performance. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., & Kilman, R. H. (1976). On organizational stories: An approach to the design and analysis of organizations through myths and stories. In R. H. Kilman, L. R. Pondy, & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organizational design (pp. 189–207). New York: Elsevier-North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2011). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model: An integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1315–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. A., Joseph, D. L., & MacCann, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence and job performance: The importance of emotion regulation and emotional labor context. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(2), 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, C. D., Su, R., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F. (2012). Vocational interests and performance: A quantitative summary of over 60 years of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 384–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongori, H. (2007). A review of literature on employee turnover. African Journal of Business Management, 1(3), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breath self-efficacy. Applied Psychology, 83, 835–852. doi:10.1037/00219010.83.6.835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. J. (1990). The price tag on turnover. Personnel Journal, 69(2), 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers, E. V., & Harris, D. A. (1964). Age and other correlates of self-concept in children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, D. (2005). A whole new mind: Moving from the information age to the conceptual age. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. L., Hargis, K., Patterson, K. J., Maxfield, D. G., Roberts, N., & Bies, R. J. (1982). Modeling-based organizational development: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 433–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo, K. E., & McCoach, D. (2012). Teacher attitudes toward subject-specific acceleration: instrument development and validation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riketta, M. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 472–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2012). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Westford: Courier Westford, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values and value systems. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, T. L., & Bandura, A. (1978). Psychological modeling: Theory and practice. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis (2nd ed., pp. 621–658). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P. M., & Harrison, J. (1984). Abnormal and normal obsessions—A replication. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 22, 549–552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardzoska, E. G., & Tang, T. L. P. (2012). Work-related behavioral intentions in Macedonia: Coping strategies, work environment, love of money, job satisfaction, and demographic variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, L. A., & Heskett, J. L. (1991). The service-driven service company. Harvard Business Review, 69(5), 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R. (Ed.). (1992). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwepker, C. H. (2001). Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the salesforce. Journal of Business Research, 54(1), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2007). Influencing student mathematics self-efficacy through teacher training. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 278–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, J. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siehl, L., & Martin, J. (1981). Learning organizational culture. Stanford: School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J., & Cervone, D. (1990). Proximal goal setting and self-regulatory processes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Super, D. T. (1970). Manual for the work values inventory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. The American Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 529–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1931). The measurement of social attitudes. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26(3), 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1946). Comment. American Journal of Sociology, 52, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. M. (1982). Managing change strategically: The technical, political, and cultural keys. Organizational Dynamics, 11(2), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepanier, S. G., Fernet, C., & Austin, S. (2012). Social and motivational antecedents of perceptions of transformational leadership: A self-determination theory perspective. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 44, 272–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1973). Assessing educational achievement in the affective domain. Measurement in Education, 4(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., Halbrook, R., Meder, D., Stuchlik, M., & Thorpe, S. (1991). Employee and customer attachment: Synergies for competitive advantage. Human Resource Planning, 14(2), 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2011). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/complete-education.pdf.

  • Valentine, S., Godkin, L., Fleischman, G. M., & Kidwell, R. (2011). Corporate ethical values, group creativity, job satisfaction and turnover intention: The impact of work context on work response. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayalakshmi, V. V., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2012). Emotional contagion and its relevance to individual behavior and organizational processes: A position paper. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(3), 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, D. E., Munson, J. M., & Nakanishi, M. (1977). An investigation of the Rokeach value survey for consumer research applications. In W. D. Perreault (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 4, pp. 247–252). Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, V. R., & Hunt, M. D. (1992). Hierarchical level, length, and quality of supervisory relationship as predictors of subordinates’ use of maintenance tactics. Communication Reports, 5, 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. D., & Hsieh, H. H. (2012). Toward a better understanding of the link between ethical climate and job satisfaction: A multilevel analysis. Business Ethnics, 105, 535–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Y. (1988). Forms of value systems: A focus on organizational effectiveness and cultural change and maintenance. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 534–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In S. Karabenick & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 16, pp. 35–70). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A., & Martin, J. (1980). Organizational legends. Stanford: School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Betsy McCoach .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCoach, D.B., Gable, R.K., Madura, J.P. (2013). Affective Characteristics in School and Corporate Environments: Their Conceptual Definitions. In: Instrument Development in the Affective Domain. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics