Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Matters: Using an Ecological Lens to Understand Female Crime and Disruptive Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perceptions of Female Offenders

Abstract

This chapter will examine how the response of the criminal and juvenile justice system both reflects and perpetuates gender-based perceptions of female offenders. Toward this aim, alternative ways of defining the social problem of female crime will be advanced. These include person-centered, person-mediated, and ecological social problem definitions. Qualitative interviews with 19 girls involved in the juvenile justice system will be used to further describe the similarities, distinctions, and implications of each type of problem definition. The importance of the ecological level of analysis in particular is underscored, with an emphasis on the gendered response of the justice system as a key element of incorporating an ecological lens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, K. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles, 52, 853–865. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4204-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00061-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. The Review of Policy Research, 1, 31–48. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M., Chesney-Lind, M., & Stein, N. (2007). Patriarchy matters: Toward a gendered theory of teen violence and victimization. Violence Against Women, 13, 1249–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush-Baskette, S. (2000). War on drugs and the incarceration of mothers. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 919–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush-Baskette, S. (2004). The war on drugs and the incarceration of mothers. In P. J. Schram & B. Koons-Witt (Eds.), Gendered (in)justice: Theory and practice in feminist criminology. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist, 28, 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest policies for girls and women. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 81–90. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2002.tb00108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2004). Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. G. (2004). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon-Granados, W., Wells, W., & Binsbacher, R. (2006). Arresting developments: Trends in female arrests for domestic violence and proposed explanations. Violence Against Women, 12, 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrensaft, M. K., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2004). Clinically abusive relationships in an unselected birth cohort: Men’s and women’s participation and developmental antecedents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 258–270. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.113.2.258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, L., & Henning, K. (2005). A comparison of male and female dually arrested domestic violence offenders. Violence and Victims, 20, 153–171. doi:10.1891/vivi.2005.20.2.153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman-Schorrig, S. P., & McDonald, J. J. (1992). The role of forensic psychiatry in the defense of sexual harassment cases. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 20, 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, L. K. (2007). Battered women’s syndrome. The Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, 8, 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, M. (1995). Oppression. In M. L. Anderson & P. Hill Collins (Eds.), Race, class, and gender (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (2000). Child abuse and neglect and the brain—A review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochhausen, N. M., Lorenz, A. R., & Newman, J. P. (2002). Specifying the impulsivity of female inmates with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 495–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javdani, S. (2006). Challenging the dominant narrative surrounding female juvenile delinquency: Toward a new problem definition. The Community Psychologist, 36, 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javdani, S., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011). Gendered Social Forces: An examination of the impact of the justice systems’ response on women and girls’ criminal trajectories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 161–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruttschnitt, C. (1996). Contributions of quantitative methods to the study of gender and crime, or bootstrapping our way into the theoretical thicket. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 135–161. doi:10.1007/BF02354413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenssen, S. A. M., Doreleijers, T. A. H., van Dijk, M. E., & Hartman, C. A. (2000). Girls in detention: What are their characteristics? A project to explore and document the character of this target group and the significant ways in which it differs from one consisting of boys. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, M., Potler, C., & Wolf, R. (1999). Gender and justice: Women, drugs, and sentencing policy. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K., Lansing, A. E., Garland, A., & Hough, R. (2002). Gender differences in psychopathology, functional impairment, and familial risk factors among adjudicated delinquents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 860–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1–24. doi:10.1177/10778010122183900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2008). Getting played: African American girls, urban inequality, and gendered violence. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. L., & Meloy, M. L. (2006). Women’s use of force: Voices of women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 89–115. doi:10.1177/1077801205277356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin longitudinal study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muftic, L. R., & Bouffard, J. A. (2007). Evaluation of gender differences in the implementation and impact of a comprehensive approach to domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 46–49. doi:10.1177/1077801206295131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, R. L., Cornille, T. A., Mullis, A. K., & Huber, J. (2004). Female juvenile offending: a review of characteristics and contexts. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 13, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, I. H., & Johnson, B. L. (2004). The role of gender in a structured sentencing system: Equal treatment, policy choices, and the sentencing of female offenders. In P. J. Schram & B. Koons-Witt (Eds.), Gendered (in)justice: Theory and practice in feminist criminology. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odgers, C. L., & Moretti, M. M. (2002). Aggressive and disruptive girls: Research update and challenges. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. M., & Davis, S. M. (2005). The continuing myth of the violent female offender. Criminal Justice Review, 30, 5–29. doi:10.1177/0734016805275378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, S. H., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 490–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, W. (1972). The art of savage discovery: How to blame the victim. In Blaming the victim (pp. 3–30). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. M. (1983). Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N. (2005). OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin: Juvenile Arrests 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 National Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J., & Thorne, B. (1985). The missing feminist revolution in sociology. Social Problems, 32, 301–316. doi:10.1525/sp.%201985.32.4.03a00010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubman, J. G., Montgomery, M. J., Gil, A. G., & Wagner, E. F. (2004). Abuse experiences in a community sample of young adults: Relations with psychiatric disorders, sexual risk behaviors, and sexually transmitted diseases. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasco, S., & Bond, M. A. (2010). The treatment of gender in community psychology research. In J. Chrisler & D. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorza, J., & Woods, L. (1994). Mandatory arrest: Problems and possibilities. New York: National Center on Women and Family Law.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, 246 Greene Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10003, USA

    Shabnam Javdani

Authors
  1. Shabnam Javdani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shabnam Javdani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, Franco Bldg 131, Reading, 19610, Pennsylvania, USA

    Brenda L. Russell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Javdani, S. (2013). Gender Matters: Using an Ecological Lens to Understand Female Crime and Disruptive Behavior. In: Russell, B. (eds) Perceptions of Female Offenders. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation