Skip to main content

How REBT Therapists Conceptualize the ABC Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The ABCs of REBT Revisited

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL))

  • 2161 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, I presented and discussed the errors and confusions that a sample of authors of counseling and psychotherapy textbooks made when discussing the ABCs of REBT. None of these authors was an REBT therapist in good standing, and while it may be assumed that REBT therapists would be accurate when they taught REBT’s ABC framework to others, this needs to be investigated rather than taken as read.

While I know the identities of the therapists who agreed to take part in this study, they shall remain anonymous since I did not inform them that they would be named in the study when I invited them to participate. I named the authors in the previous study because their work is in the public arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As this book is being published in North America, I refer to this geographical region as “home” even though I am from England!

  2. 2.

    I discussed whether or not this is an irrational belief in the final bullet item in the section above entitled “Confusion about the nature of an irrational belief.”

  3. 3.

    This latter statement is a rational belief but is far too general.

  4. 4.

    This latter statement is also a rational belief but is again far too general.

  5. 5.

    In this section, I will discuss this issue with respect to partial and full self-acceptance beliefs. The same points are relevant to partial and full other-acceptance and life-acceptance beliefs.

  6. 6.

    As I showed earlier, this therapist provides two different As throughout his example (i.e., fainting and acting foolishly). I will take the first of these in correcting the “pantomime horse” rational belief.

  7. 7.

    I have assumed that anger in these examples is unhealthy.

References

  • Dryden, W. (2006b). Getting started with REBT: A concise guide for clients.Hove, East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2009). Rational emotive behaviour therapy: Distinctive features.Hove, East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1977). Anger: How to live with and without it.Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trexler, L. D. (1976). Frustration is a fact, not a feeling. Rational Living, 11(2), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dryden, W. (2013). How REBT Therapists Conceptualize the ABC Framework. In: The ABCs of REBT Revisited. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5734-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics