Skip to main content

How Clients Conceptualize the ABC Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The ABCs of REBT Revisited

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL))

  • 2180 Accesses

Abstract

The exploratory research on which this chapter has been based set out to develop an initial framework and categorization scheme for understanding patients’ initial doubts, reservations, and objections to the ABCs of REBT and their application. Sixty patients were asked to write down their doubts following a pre-therapy “Introduction to REBT” session. Subsequently, an emergent content analysis was carried out to identify main themes. The content analysis revealed five general categories, of which the two largest ones concerned theoretical doubts about the ABC model and doubts about putting the ABC model into practice. Further subcategorization revealed a variety of concerns that related to these categories. For example, a large proportion of doubts about putting the ABC model into practice were subcategorized as concerning the perceived difficulty of doing so. In turn, this subcategory contained further subcategories of difficulty-related beliefs.

This chapter is based on the study of Dryden, W., Hurton, N., Malki, D., Manias, P., & Williams K. (2008). Patients’ initial doubts, reservations and objections to the ABC’s of REBT and their application. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 26, 63–68.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While I now refer to LFT as discomfort intolerance, I will use “LFT” here since this was the term used in the research.

  2. 2.

    While I now refer to full preferences as flexible beliefs, I will use the term “full preferences” here since this was the term used in the research.

  3. 3.

    While I now refer to HFT as discomfort tolerance, I will use “HFT” since this was the term used in the research.

  4. 4.

    The initial sample comprised 60 patients, but one patient requested that their data be removed from the research.

References

  • Dryden, W. (2006a). Counselling in a nutshell. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2004). Rational emotive behaviour therapy: Client’s manual. London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W., & Feltham, C. (Eds.). (1992). Psychotherapy and its discontents. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M., & Williams, D. (2003). The client experience of counselling and psychotherapy. Counselling Psychology Review, 18, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus: Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1991). The revised ABC’s of rational-emotive therapy (RET). Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 9, 139–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (2002). Overcoming resistance: A rational emotive behavior therapy integrated approach (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, G. L. (1985). Frequent misperceptions of rational-emotive therapy: An overview for the rehabilitation counselor. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 16(4), 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. E. (1998). Albert Ellis at 85: Professional reflections. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 16, 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macran, S., Ross, H., Hardy, G. E., & Shapiro, D. A. (1999). The importance of considering clients’ perspectives in psychotherapy research. Journal of Mental Health, 8, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C. (Ed.). (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patient needs. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orne, M. T., & Wender, P. H. (1968). Anticipatory socialisation for psychotherapy: Method and rationale. American Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 1202–1212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzberg, L., & Elkins, G. R. (1980). An examination of common concerns about rational-emotive therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 11, 324–330.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dryden, W. (2013). How Clients Conceptualize the ABC Framework. In: The ABCs of REBT Revisited. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5734-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics