Abstract
Evidence-based treatment and the assessment of treatment effectiveness are dependent upon the collection of data during the evaluation process providing information about symptoms, impairment, and abilities. Such an assessment allows for a seamless transition from assessment and diagnosis to effective treatment. Evaluating the effectiveness of a treatment strategy or program is important for interventions designed to address symptoms related to any psychological or developmental disorder. The validity of this entire process is closely related to the tools used during the diagnostic and treatment process. More specifically, the reliability and validity of the tools used will be directly related to the psychometric attributes of the instruments. As in all areas of science, what is learned depends upon the quality of the data generated and the manner in which the findings are interpreted. Scientifically developed diagnostic and assessment instruments yield accurate and informative data. Tests and rating scales developed to provide valid and reliable information about the examinee better informs researchers and clinicians. Tools chosen for diagnostic decision-making and treatment planning have a profound impact on the information obtained and the conclusions reached. The better the tools, the more valid and reliable the decisions and most importantly, the more helpful the information gathered will be in developing a treatment plan, monitoring progress, and documenting treatment effectiveness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Arick, J., Young, H., Falco, R., Loos, L., Krug, D., Gense, M., & Johnson, S. (2003). Designing an outcome study to monitor the progress of students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(2), 75–87.
Bracken, B. A. (1987). Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 5(4), 313–326.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt.
Goldstein, S., & Naglieri, J. A. (2009). Autism spectrum rating scale. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19.
Jensen, P. S. (2001). Clinical equivalence: A step, a misstep, or just a misnomer? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(4), 436–440.
Kasari, C., Paparella, T., Freeman, S., & Jahromi, L. (2008). Language outcome in autism: Randomized comparison of joint attention and play interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 125–137.
LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Devereux early childhood assessment clinical form (DECA-C). Lewisville: Kaplan Press.
Naglieri, J. A. (2012). Psychological assessment by school psychologists: Opportunities and challenges of a changing landscape. In K. Geisinger, & B. A. Bracken (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology. Washington, DC: APA.
Naglieri, J. A., & Chambers, K. (2009). Psychometric issues and current scales for assessing autism spectrum disorders. In S. Goldstein, J. A. Naglieri, & S. Ozonoff (Eds.), Assessment of autism spectrum disorders (pp. 55–90). New York: Springer.
Naglieri, J. A., McNeish, T. J., & Bardos, A. N. (1991). Draw a person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance. Austin: Pro-Ed.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1981). Assessment in special and remedial education (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Tingey, R. C., Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., & Hansen, N. B. (1996). Clinically significant change: Practical indicators for evaluating psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 6(2), 144–153.
Wechsler, D., & Naglieri, J. A. (2006). Wechsler nonverbal scale of ability. San Antonio: Pearson.
Williams, K. T. (1997). Expressive vocabulary test (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: Pearson Assessments.
World Health Organization. (2007). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems—10th Revision. Geneva: Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Quick Solution Guide
Peer Socialization
Increase ability to seek out other children
Initiate conversation with other children
Increase ability to play appropriately with other children
Increase ability to understand humor
Improve ability to carry on normal conversation with peers
Respond appropriately when other children initiate
Adult Socialization
Respond appropriately to adult requests
Maintain eye contact when speaking with an adult
Maintain on task conversation when speaking with adult
Social/Emotional Reciprocity
Demonstrate appropriate emotion
Enjoy fun activities with others
Look at others when speaking to them
Pick up on social cues
Understand the feelings of others
Share enjoyment with others
Smile appropriately
Atypical Language
Use language appropriate for age
Speak with normal, pitch, tone and rhythm
Avoid echolalia
Maintain a topic when speaking
Use appropriate pronouns
Stereotypy
Reduce repetitive behavior such as hand flapping
Shift focus of discussion easily
Avoid fascination with parts of objects
Avoid repetitive activities with objects such as twirling, spinning or banging
Behavioral Rigidity
Increase ability to handle change in routine
Avoid obsession with details
Avoid insistence on doing things the same way each time
Sensory Sensitivity
Desensitize to fabrics and tags in clothing
Desensitize to touch
Avoid smelling, tasting or eating inedible objects
Become comfortable with touch
React normally to sound in the environment
Attention/Self-Regulation
Stick with boring tasks
Continue working with surrounding noise
Sustain effort during work
Stay focused when reading
Maintain an on task conversation
Sustain attention and concentrate for long periods of time
Listen to instructions
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Naglieri, J.A., Goldstein, S. (2013). Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness in the Field of Autism. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J. (eds) Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5301-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5301-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5300-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5301-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)