Abstract
Although COACTIV did not gather data directly by means of classroom observation, it nevertheless provided concrete insights into the mathematics instruction provided, by reconstructing learning situations at the task level. Specifically, the tasks actually assigned by the COACTIV teachers were analyzed as documents of mathematics instruction, being classified according to a newly developed classification system with a focus on the potential for cognitive activation. The structure and scope of this classification system are presented in this chapter. As a complement to the self-report measures discussed in Chap. 6, the tasks submitted by the COACTIV teachers provide real, “objective” evidence of the content of mathematics instruction at the end of lower secondary education in Germany. The results presented in Chap. 6 and in this chapter support each other in indicating that mathematics instruction in Germany tends to offer little potential for cognitive activation. Yet, as Chap. 9 shows, exposure to more cognitively demanding tasks has positive effects on student learning gains. On the meta-level, our findings provide evidence for the theoretical argument that the tasks administered play a key role in promoting students’ mathematical learning—and that tasks are thus indeed suitable indicators of cognitive activation in the classroom.
Alexander Jordan (deceased)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a detailed description of the rating process, see Jordan et al. 2006, pp. 17ff. and 67ff.
References
Baumert J, Lehmann R, Lehrke M, Schmitz B, Clausen M, Hosenfeld I, … Neubrand J (1997) TIMSS – Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich: Deskriptive Befunde [TIMSS—Mathematics and science instruction in international comparison: descriptive findings]. Leske + Budrich, Opladen
Baumert J, Kunter M, Blum W, Brunner M, Dubberke T, Jordan A, … Tsai Y-M (2010) Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. Am Educ Res J 47(1):133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
Becker J, Shimada S (eds) (1997) The open-ended approach: a new proposal for teaching mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), Reston
Blum W (1996) Anwendungsbezüge im Mathematikunterricht: Trends und Perspektiven [Practical applications in mathematics instruction: trends and perspectives]. In: Kadunz G, Kautschitsch H, Ossimitz G, Schneider E (eds) Trends und Perspektiven: Beiträge zum 7. Internationalen Symposium zur Didaktik der Mathematik in Klagenfurt. Hölcher-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp 15–38
Blum W, vom Hofe R, Jordan A, Kleine M (2004) Grundvorstellungen als diagnostisches und aufgabenanalytisches Instrument bei PISA [Basic concepts as a diagnostic and analytic instrument in PISA]. In: Neubrand M (ed) Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 145–157
Blum W, Drüke-Noe C, Hartung R, Köller O (2006) Bildungsstandards Mathematik: konkret. Sekundarstufe I: Aufgabenbeispiele, Unterrichtsanregungen, Fortbildungsideen [Educational standards for mathematics at lower secondary level: sample tasks, suggestions for lessons, ideas for continuing education]. Cornelsen-Scriptor, Berlin
Blum W, Galbraith P, Henn H-W, Niss M (2007) Modelling and applications in mathematics education: the 14th ICMI study. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1
Bromme R, Seeger F, Steinbring H (1990) Aufgaben als Anforderungen an Lehrer und Schüler [Tasks as challenges for teachers and students]. Aulis, Cologne
Christiansen B, Walther G (1986) Task and activity. In: Christiansen B, Howson A-G, Otte M (eds) Perspectives on mathematics education. D. Reichel, Dordrecht, pp 243–307
Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cohors-Fresenborg E, Sjuts J, Sommer N (2004) Komplexität von Denkvorgängen und Formalisierung von Wissen [Complexity of thought processes and formalization of knowledge]. In: Neubrand M (ed) Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 109–144
Enright MK, Sheehan KM (2002) Modeling the difficulty of quantitative reasoning items: implication for item generation. In: Irvine SH, Kyllonen PL (eds) Item generation for test development. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 129–158
Fleiss JL (1973) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York
Jordan A, Ross N, Krauss S, Baumert J, Blum W, Neubrand M, … Kunter M (2006) Klassifikationsschema für Mathematikaufgaben: Dokumente der Aufgabenkategorisierung im COACTIV-Projekt [Classification scheme for mathematics tasks: documentation of task classification in the COACTIV project]. Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin
Jordan A, Krauss S, Löwen K, Blum W, Neubrand M, Brunner M, … Baumert J (2008) Aufgaben im COACTIV-Projekt: Zeugnisse des kognitiven Aktivierungspotentials im deutschen Mathematikunterricht [Tasks in the COACTIV project: evidence of the potential for cognitive activation in German mathematics instruction]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 29(2):83–107
Knoche N, Lind D, Blum W, Cohors-Fresenborg E, Flade L, Löding W, … Wynands A (2002) Die PISA-Studie: Einige Ergebnisse und Analysen [The PISA study: selected results and analyses]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 23(3/4):159–202
Knoll S (2003) Verwendung von Aufgaben in Einführungsphasen des Mathematikunterrichts [The use of tasks in introductory phases of mathematics instruction]. Tectum Verlag, Marburg
Krauss S, Neubrand M, Blum W, Baumert J, Brunner M, Kunter M, Jordan A (2008) Die Untersuchung des professionellen Wissens deutscher Mathematik-Lehrerinnen und -Lehrer im Rahmen der COACTIV-Studie [The investigation of the professional knowledge of German mathematics teachers in the context of the COACTIV study]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 29(3/4):223–258
Lenné M (1969) Analyse der Mathematikdidaktik in Deutschland [Analysis of mathematics education in Germany]. Klett, Stuttgart
Mason J, Johnston-Wilder S (2004) Designing and using mathematical tasks. Open University, Milton Keynes
Neubrand J (2002) Eine Klassifikation mathematischer Aufgaben zur Analyse von Unterrichtssituationen: Selbsttätiges Arbeiten in Schülerarbeitsphasen in den Stunden der TIMSS-Video-Studie [A classification of mathematics tasks for the analysis of instructional situations: independent work during phases of student work in the TIMSS Video Study lessons]. Franzbecker, Hildesheim
Neubrand M (ed) (2004) Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 [Mathematical literacy of students in Germany: in-depth analyses in the context of PISA 2000]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Neubrand J (2006) The TIMSS 1995 and 1999 video studies. In: Leung FKS, Graf K-D, Lopez-Real FJ (eds) Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: a comparative study of East Asia and the West. The 13th ICMI study. Springer, Berlin, pp 291–318. doi:10.1007/0-387-29723-5_18
Neubrand M (2009) Mathematische Bildung in der Sekundarstufe: Orientierungen für die inhaltliche Ausgestaltung von Übergängen [Mathematics education at secondary level: orientation for the design of transitions]. In: Heinze A, Grüßing M (eds) Mathematiklernen vom Kindergarten bis zum Studium: Kontinuität und Kohärenz als Herausforderung für den Mathematikunterricht. Waxmann, Münster, pp 181–190
Neubrand M (2013) PISA mathematics in Germany: extending the conceptual framework to enable a more differentiated assessment. In: Prenzel M, Kobarg M, Schöps K, & Rönnebeck S (eds) Research on PISA: Research outcomes of the PISA research conference 2009. Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London. (pp 39–49)
Neubrand J, Neubrand M (1999) Effekte multipler Lösungsmöglichkeiten: Beispiele aus einer japanischen Mathematikstunde [Effects of multiple solution paths: examples from a Japanese mathematics lesson]. In: Selter C, Walther G (eds) Mathematikdidaktik als design science: Festschrift für Erich Christian Wittmann. Ernst Klett Grundschulverlag, Leipzig, pp 148–158
Neubrand J, Neubrand M (2004) Innere Strukturen mathematischer Leistung im PISA-2000-Test [Internal structures of mathematics achievement in the PISA 2000 test]. In: Neubrand M (ed) Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 87–107
Neubrand M, Biehler R, Blum W, Cohors-Fresenborg E, Flade L, Knoche N, … Wynands A (2001) Grundlagen der Ergänzung des internationalen PISA-Mathematik-Tests in der deutschen Zusatzerhebung [Principles for supplementing the international PISA mathematics test in the German national extension study]. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 33(2):45–59. doi:10.1007/BF02652739
Neubrand M, Klieme E, Lüdtke O, Neubrand J (2002) Kompetenzstufen und Schwierigkeitsmodelle für den PISA-Test zur mathematischen Grundbildung [Proficiency levels and difficulty models for the PISA test of mathematical literacy]. Unterrichtswissenschaft 30(2):100–119
Neubrand M, Biehler R, Blum W, Cohors-Fresenborg E, Flade L, Knoche N, … Neubrand J (2004) Der Prozess der Itementwicklung bei der nationalen Ergänzungsuntersuchung von PISA 2000: Vom theoretischen Rahmen zu den konkreten Aufgaben [The process of item development in the German national extension study to PISA 2000: from a theoretical framework to specific tasks]. In: Neubrand M (ed) Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA-2000. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 31–49
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003) The PISA 2003 assessment framework: mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. OECD, Paris
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (ed) (2004) PISA: learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. OECD, Paris
Prenzel M, Baumert J, Blum W, Lehmann R, Leutner D, Neubrand M, Pekrun R, Rolff H-G, Rost R, Schiefele U (eds) (2004) PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs [PISA 2003: the educational attainment of your people in Germany—results of the second international comparison]. Waxmann, Münster
Renkl A (1991) Die Bedeutung der Aufgaben- und Rückmeldungsgestaltung für die Leistungsentwicklung im Fach Mathematik [The meaning of task and feedback format for student learning gains in mathematics]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Heidelberg
Schupp H (1988) Anwendungsorientierter Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I zwischen Tradition und neuen Impulsen [Applied mathematics instruction at lower secondary level between tradition and new ideas]. Der Mathematikunterricht 34(6):5–16
Shavelson RJ, Webb NM (1991) Generalizability theory: a primer. Sage, Newbury Park
Stigler JW, Gonzales P, Kawanaka T, Knoll S, Serrano A (1999) The TIMSS Video Tape Classroom Study: methods and findings from an explanatory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan and the United States. Publ. NCES 1999-074, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Washington, DC
Vom Hofe R (1995) Grundvorstellungen mathematischer Inhalte [Basic concepts of mathematical content]. Spektrum, Heidelberg
Vom Hofe R, Kleine M, Blum W, Pekrun R (2005) On the role of “Grundvorstellungen” for the development of mathematical literacy: first results of the longitudinal study PALMA. Mediterr J Res Math Educ 4:67–84
Williams G (2000) Collaborative problem solving in mathematics: the nature and function of task complexity. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Melbourne
Williams G (2002) Identifying tasks that promote creative thinking in mathematics: a tool. In: Barton B, Irwin K, Pfannkuch M, Thomas M (eds) Mathematical education in the South Pacific: proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, vol II,. MERGA, Auckland, pp 698–705
Williams G, Clarke D (1997) Mathematical task complexity and task selection. In: Clarke D, Clarkson P, Gronn D, Horne M, Lowe L, Mackinlay M, McDonough A (eds) Mathematics, imagine the possibilities: proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria,. MAV, Brunswick, pp 406–415
Zaslavsky O (2007) Mathematics-related tasks, teacher education, and teacher educators: the dynamics associated with tasks in mathematics teacher education. J Math Teach Educ 10(6):433–440. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9060-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Busine0ss Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neubrand, M., Jordan, A., Krauss, S., Blum, W., Löwen, K. (2013). Task Analysis in COACTIV: Examining the Potential for Cognitive Activation in German Mathematics Classrooms. In: Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. (eds) Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5148-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5149-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)