Abstract
This chapter begins with an overview of the history of qualitative family research. This section shows that today’s research builds upon a rich heritage that extends to the origins of social science research. This heritage is a source of enduring principles, methodologies, and methods, as well as a rich vocabulary that qualitative family researchers can use as they explain their work to others. This heritage emphasizes, multiple perspectives, person-environment interactions, critical stances regarding gender, race, and other power issues, theory-building, descriptive research, and the meanings of human experience. From this overview, I construct an analytic framework that I use to examine contemporary qualitative family research. I show how this heritage has endured, as well as how it has changed over time. I end with a discussion of the implications of the analysis for the future of qualitative family research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. (1925). The hobo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, H. S. (1953). Becoming a marihuana user. The American Journal of Sociology, 59, 235–242.
Becker, H. S. (1988). Blumer’s conceptual impact. Symbolic Interaction, 11, 13–20.
Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in white. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blumer, H. (1928). Method in social psychology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Blumer, H. (1969). An appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish peasant in Europe and America (pp. 117–126). (Original work published 1939 in Social Science Council Bulletin, 44, Critiques of research in the social sciences I, 69–81)
Blumer, H. (1986). What is wrong with social theory? In H. Blumer (1969/1986), Symbolic interactionism (pp. 140–152). Berkeley: University of California Press. Originally published in Vol. XIX in The American Sociological Review. (Original work published 1954)
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Booth, C. (1889). Life and labour of the people (Vol. I). London: Macmillan.
Booth, C. (1903). Life and labour of the people in London. Final volume. London: Macmillan.
Bott, E. (1971). Family and social network. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1957)
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.
Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. Family, 7, 3–9.
Burgess, E. W. (1927). Statistics and case studies as methods of sociological research. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 103–120.
Burgess, E. W. (1932). Editor’s preface. In E. Franklin Frazier (Ed.), The Negro family in Chicago (pp. ix–xii). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burton, L. M., Cherlin, A., Winn, D. M., Estacion, A., & Holder-Taylor, C. (2009). The role of trust in low-income mothers’ intimate unions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 1107–1124.
Burton, L. M., Purvin, D., & Garrett-Peters, R. (2009). Longitudinal ethnography: Uncovering domestic abuse in low-income women’s lives. In G. H. Elder Jr. & J. Z. Giele (Eds.), The craft of life course research (pp. 70–92). New York: Guilford.
Calkins, C. (1930). Some folks won’t work. Rahway, NJ: Quinn and Goden.
Cooley, C. H. (1930). Sociological theory and social research. New York: Holt.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cressey, D. (1953). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738–743.
Deegan, M. J. (1990). Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Dilthey, W. (1976). Selected writings (H. P. Rickman, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dollard, J. (1937). Caste and class in a southern town. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dollard, J. (1949). Criteria for the life history. New York: Smith.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being in the world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Elder, G. H., Jr. (1978). Family history and the life course. Transitions: The family and the life course in historical perspective (pp. 17–64). New York: Academic.
Elder, G. H., Jr., & J. Z. Giele (Eds.). (1979). The craft of life course research. (pp. 70–92) New York: Guilford.
Faris, R. E. L. (1967). Chicago sociology 1920–1932. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frazier, E. F. (1932). The Negro family in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frazier, E. F. (1939). The Negro family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giele, J. Z. (2009). Life stories to understand diversity: Variations by class, race, and gender. In G. H. Elder Jr. & J. Z. Giele (Eds.), The craft of life course research (pp. 236–257). New York: Guilford.
Gilgun, J. F. (1992). Chicago days: Handel, Lopata, and Strauss tell stories of their lives as students at Chicago. Qualitative Family Research, 6(2), 3–6.
Gilgun, J. F. (1995). We shared something special: The moral discourse of incest perpetrators. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 265–281.
Gilgun, J. F. (1999). Methodological pluralism and qualitative family research. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 219–261). New York: Plenum.
Gilgun, J. F. (2002). Conjectures and refutations: Governmental funding and qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 359–375.
Gilgun, J. F. (2005). Qualitative research and family psychology. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 40–50.
Gilgun, J. F. (2007). The legacy of the Chicago school of sociology for family theory-building. In Pre-conference workshop on theory construction and research methodology. Pittsburgh, PA: National Council on Family Relation, November 7, 2007.
Gilgun, J. F., Daly, K., & Handel, G. (1992). Qualitative methods in family research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Gilgun, J. F. (2012). Enduring themes in qualitative family research. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 4, 80–95.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Gluckman, M. (1971). Preface. In E. Bott (Ed.), Family and social network (2nd ed., pp. xiii–xxx). New York: Free Press.
Hall, H. (1931). Introduction. In National Federation of Settlements, Case studies of unemployment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Hammersley, M. (1989). The dilemma of qualitative method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago tradition. London: Routledge.
Handel, G. (1965). Psychological study of whole families. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 19–41.
Handel, G. (Ed.). (1967). The psychosocial interior of the family. Chicago: Aldine.
Handel, G. (Ed.). (1988). Childhood socialization. New York: Aldine.
Handel, G. (1991). Case study in family research. In J. R. Geagin, A. M. Orum, & G. Sjoberg (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 244–268). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Handel, G. (1996). Family worlds and qualitative family research. In J. F. Gilgun & M. B. Sussman (Eds.), The methods and methodologies of qualitative family research (pp. 335–348). New York: Haworth.
Handel, G., & Whitchurch, G. G. (Eds.). (1993). The psychosocial interior of the family (4th ed., pp. 69–85). New York: Aldine.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking form women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hess, R. D., & Handel, G. (1959). Family worlds: A psychosocial approach to family life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hodges, H. A. (1994). William Dilthey: An introduction. London: Routledge. Hull-House maps and papers, by residents of Hull-House, a social settlement. A presentation of nationalities and wages in a congested district of Chicago, together with comments and essays on problems growing out of the social conditions (1895). New York: Crowell.
Johnson, C. S. (1922). The Negro in Chicago: A study of race relations and a race riot. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kellogg, P. U. (Ed.). (1914a). Pittsburgh district: Civic frontage. New York: Russsell Sage Foundation.
Kellogg, P. U. (1914b). The Pittsburgh survey vol. I, The Pittsburgh district—civic frontage. New York: Survey Associates.
Komarovsky, M. (1940). The unemployed man and his family. New York: Dryden.
Komarovsky, M. (1962). Blue-collar marriage. New York: Random House.
LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schummn, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum.
Laslett, B. (1991). Biography as historical sociology: The case of William Fielding Ogburn. Theory and Society, 20, 511–538.
LePlay, F. (1855). Les ouvrierseuropeens. Tours: Alfred Mame.
LePlay, F. E. (1866). La reforme social en France. Paris: Dentu.
LePlay, F. (1879). Les ouvrierseuropeens (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Paris: Alfred Mame et fils.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw Hill.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lindesmith, A. R. (1947). Opiate addiction. Bloomington, IN: Principia.
Lopata, H. Z. (1992). Sensitizing concepts, historical analysis, and role theory. Qualitative Family Research, 6(1), 1–2, 13.
Matthews, F. H. (1977). Quest for an American sociology: Robert E. Park and the Chicago School. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
McLeod, A. (2007). Whose agenda? Issues of power and relation- ship when listening to looked after young people. Child & Family Social Work, 12, 278–286.
Morrissey, M. H. (1996). A public face for private troubles: Helen Hall and the Unemployment Study of 1928. In Paper presented at the 42nd annual program meeting council on social work education, Washington, DC, February 1996.
Mowrer, E. R. (1932). Family. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
National Federation of Settlements. (1931). Case studies of unemployment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Packer, M. (1985). Hermeneutic inquiry in the study of human conduct. American Psychologist, 40, 1081–1093.
Packer, M. J., & Addison, R. B. (Eds.). (1989). Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretive theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Palmer, V. (1928). Field methods in sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (Eds.). (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polkinghorne, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York at Albany.
Rainwater, L. (1970). Behind ghetto walls. Chicago: Aldine.
Rainwater, L., Coleman, R., & Handel, G. (1959). Workingman’s wife. New York: Oceana.
Riach, K. (2009). Exploring participant-centred reflexivity in the research interview. Sociology, 43(2), 356–370.
Rosenblatt, P. C., & Fischer, L. R. (1993). Qualitative family research. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schummn, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 167–177). New York: Plenum.
Rowntree, B. S. (1902). Poverty: A study of town life (4th ed.). London: MacMillan. (Original work published 1901)
Rubin, J. (1988, January). Ethics and the concept of the person. Lecture series at the University of California, San Francisco.
Schofield, G. (2005). The voice of the child in family placement decision making: A developmental model. Adoption and Fostering, 29, 29–44.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic.
Silver, C. B. (1982). Edited, translated and with an introduction by Catherine Bodard Silver. In F. LePlay (Ed.), On family, work, and social change (pp. 3–134). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Small, A. W. (1916). Fifty years of sociology in the United States, 1865–1915. The American Journal of Sociology, 21, 712–864.
Son, S., & Bauer, J. W. (2010). Employed, rural, low-income, single mothers’ family and work over time. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 31, 107–120.
Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper.
Strauss, A. (1991). A personal history of the development of grounded theory. Qualitative Family Research, 5(2), 1–2.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (Eds.). (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1929). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf.
Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1927). The Polish peasant in Europe and America (Vols. 1–2). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1918–1920)
Waller, W. (1934). Insight and the scientific method. The American Journal of Sociology, XL, 285–297.
Warner, W. L., & Lunt, P. S. (1941). The social life of a modern community. Vol. 1 of The Yankee City Series. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wax, R. H. (1971). Doing fieldwork: Warnings and advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Webb, S., & Webb, B. (1932). Methods of social study. London: Longman, Green.
Winter, K. (2010). The perspectives of young children in care about their circumstances and implications for social work practice. Child and Family Social Work, 15, 186–195.
Wiseman, J. E. (1979). Stations of the lost: The treatment of skid row alcoholics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wiseman, J. E. (1981). The family and its researcher in the eighties: Retrenching, renewing, and revitalizing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 263–266.
Wiseman, J. E. (1991). The other half: Wives of alcoholics and their social-psychological situation. New York: Aldine.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Young, P. (1932). The pilgrims of Russian Town. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zimbalist, S. E. (1977). Historic themes and landmarks in social welfare research. New York: Harper & Row.
Zimmerman, C. C., & Frampton, M. E. (1935). Family and society: A study of the sociology of reconstruction. New York: Van Nostrand.
Znaniecki, F. (1934). The method of sociology. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
Zuo, J. (2009). Rethinking family patriarchy and women’s positions in presocialist China. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 542–557.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilgun, J.F. (2013). Qualitative Family Research: Enduring Themes and Contemporary Variations. In: Peterson, G., Bush, K. (eds) Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3986-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3987-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)