Skip to main content

Qualitative Family Research: Enduring Themes and Contemporary Variations

  • Chapter
Handbook of Marriage and the Family

Abstract

This chapter begins with an overview of the history of qualitative family research. This section shows that today’s research builds upon a rich heritage that extends to the origins of social science research. This heritage is a source of enduring principles, methodologies, and methods, as well as a rich vocabulary that qualitative family researchers can use as they explain their work to others. This heritage emphasizes, multiple perspectives, person-environment interactions, critical stances regarding gender, race, and other power issues, theory-building, descriptive research, and the meanings of human experience. From this overview, I construct an analytic framework that I use to examine contemporary qualitative family research. I show how this heritage has endured, as well as how it has changed over time. I end with a discussion of the implications of the analysis for the future of qualitative family research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N. (1925). The hobo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1953). Becoming a marihuana user. The American Journal of Sociology, 59, 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1988). Blumer’s conceptual impact. Symbolic Interaction, 11, 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in white. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1928). Method in social psychology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). An appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish peasant in Europe and America (pp. 117–126). (Original work published 1939 in Social Science Council Bulletin, 44, Critiques of research in the social sciences I, 69–81)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1986). What is wrong with social theory? In H. Blumer (1969/1986), Symbolic interactionism (pp. 140–152). Berkeley: University of California Press. Originally published in Vol. XIX in The American Sociological Review. (Original work published 1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, C. (1889). Life and labour of the people (Vol. I). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, C. (1903). Life and labour of the people in London. Final volume. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott, E. (1971). Family and social network. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. Family, 7, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1927). Statistics and case studies as methods of sociological research. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1932). Editor’s preface. In E. Franklin Frazier (Ed.), The Negro family in Chicago (pp. ix–xii). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. M., Cherlin, A., Winn, D. M., Estacion, A., & Holder-Taylor, C. (2009). The role of trust in low-income mothers’ intimate unions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 1107–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. M., Purvin, D., & Garrett-Peters, R. (2009). Longitudinal ethnography: Uncovering domestic abuse in low-income women’s lives. In G. H. Elder Jr. & J. Z. Giele (Eds.), The craft of life course research (pp. 70–92). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, C. (1930). Some folks won’t work. Rahway, NJ: Quinn and Goden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1930). Sociological theory and social research. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. (1953). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, M. J. (1990). Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1976). Selected writings (H. P. Rickman, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, J. (1937). Caste and class in a southern town. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, J. (1949). Criteria for the life history. New York: Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being in the world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Jr. (1978). Family history and the life course. Transitions: The family and the life course in historical perspective (pp. 17–64). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Jr., & J. Z. Giele (Eds.). (1979). The craft of life course research. (pp. 70–92) New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, R. E. L. (1967). Chicago sociology 1920–1932. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, E. F. (1932). The Negro family in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, E. F. (1939). The Negro family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giele, J. Z. (2009). Life stories to understand diversity: Variations by class, race, and gender. In G. H. Elder Jr. & J. Z. Giele (Eds.), The craft of life course research (pp. 236–257). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilgun, J. F. (1992). Chicago days: Handel, Lopata, and Strauss tell stories of their lives as students at Chicago. Qualitative Family Research, 6(2), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilgun, J. F. (1995). We shared something special: The moral discourse of incest perpetrators. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilgun, J. F. (1999). Methodological pluralism and qualitative family research. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 219–261). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilgun, J. F. (2002). Conjectures and refutations: Governmental funding and qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilgun, J. F. (2005). Qualitative research and family psychology. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilgun, J. F. (2007). The legacy of the Chicago school of sociology for family theory-building. In Pre-conference workshop on theory construction and research methodology. Pittsburgh, PA: National Council on Family Relation, November 7, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilgun, J. F., Daly, K., & Handel, G. (1992). Qualitative methods in family research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Gilgun, J. F. (2012). Enduring themes in qualitative family research. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 4, 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, M. (1971). Preface. In E. Bott (Ed.), Family and social network (2nd ed., pp. xiii–xxx). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H. (1931). Introduction. In National Federation of Settlements, Case studies of unemployment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (1989). The dilemma of qualitative method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago tradition. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (1965). Psychological study of whole families. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (Ed.). (1967). The psychosocial interior of the family. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (Ed.). (1988). Childhood socialization. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (1991). Case study in family research. In J. R. Geagin, A. M. Orum, & G. Sjoberg (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 244–268). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (1996). Family worlds and qualitative family research. In J. F. Gilgun & M. B. Sussman (Eds.), The methods and methodologies of qualitative family research (pp. 335–348). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G., & Whitchurch, G. G. (Eds.). (1993). The psychosocial interior of the family (4th ed., pp. 69–85). New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking form women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. D., & Handel, G. (1959). Family worlds: A psychosocial approach to family life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, H. A. (1994). William Dilthey: An introduction. London: Routledge. Hull-House maps and papers, by residents of Hull-House, a social settlement. A presentation of nationalities and wages in a congested district of Chicago, together with comments and essays on problems growing out of the social conditions (1895). New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. S. (1922). The Negro in Chicago: A study of race relations and a race riot. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, P. U. (Ed.). (1914a). Pittsburgh district: Civic frontage. New York: Russsell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, P. U. (1914b). The Pittsburgh survey vol. I, The Pittsburgh district—civic frontage. New York: Survey Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. (1940). The unemployed man and his family. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. (1962). Blue-collar marriage. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schummn, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, B. (1991). Biography as historical sociology: The case of William Fielding Ogburn. Theory and Society, 20, 511–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePlay, F. (1855). Les ouvrierseuropeens. Tours: Alfred Mame.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePlay, F. E. (1866). La reforme social en France. Paris: Dentu.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePlay, F. (1879). Les ouvrierseuropeens (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Paris: Alfred Mame et fils.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindesmith, A. R. (1947). Opiate addiction. Bloomington, IN: Principia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopata, H. Z. (1992). Sensitizing concepts, historical analysis, and role theory. Qualitative Family Research, 6(1), 1–2, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, F. H. (1977). Quest for an American sociology: Robert E. Park and the Chicago School. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, A. (2007). Whose agenda? Issues of power and relation- ship when listening to looked after young people. Child & Family Social Work, 12, 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, M. H. (1996). A public face for private troubles: Helen Hall and the Unemployment Study of 1928. In Paper presented at the 42nd annual program meeting council on social work education, Washington, DC, February 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, E. R. (1932). Family. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Federation of Settlements. (1931). Case studies of unemployment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, M. (1985). Hermeneutic inquiry in the study of human conduct. American Psychologist, 40, 1081–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer, M. J., & Addison, R. B. (Eds.). (1989). Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretive theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, V. (1928). Field methods in sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (Eds.). (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York at Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. (1970). Behind ghetto walls. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L., Coleman, R., & Handel, G. (1959). Workingman’s wife. New York: Oceana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riach, K. (2009). Exploring participant-centred reflexivity in the research interview. Sociology, 43(2), 356–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P. C., & Fischer, L. R. (1993). Qualitative family research. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schummn, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 167–177). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, B. S. (1902). Poverty: A study of town life (4th ed.). London: MacMillan. (Original work published 1901)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1988, January). Ethics and the concept of the person. Lecture series at the University of California, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, G. (2005). The voice of the child in family placement decision making: A developmental model. Adoption and Fostering, 29, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, C. B. (1982). Edited, translated and with an introduction by Catherine Bodard Silver. In F. LePlay (Ed.), On family, work, and social change (pp. 3–134). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, A. W. (1916). Fifty years of sociology in the United States, 1865–1915. The American Journal of Sociology, 21, 712–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, S., & Bauer, J. W. (2010). Employed, rural, low-income, single mothers’ family and work over time. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 31, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. B. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1991). A personal history of the development of grounded theory. Qualitative Family Research, 5(2), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (Eds.). (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1929). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1927). The Polish peasant in Europe and America (Vols. 1–2). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1918–1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1934). Insight and the scientific method. The American Journal of Sociology, XL, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W. L., & Lunt, P. S. (1941). The social life of a modern community. Vol. 1 of The Yankee City Series. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax, R. H. (1971). Doing fieldwork: Warnings and advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S., & Webb, B. (1932). Methods of social study. London: Longman, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, K. (2010). The perspectives of young children in care about their circumstances and implications for social work practice. Child and Family Social Work, 15, 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. E. (1979). Stations of the lost: The treatment of skid row alcoholics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. E. (1981). The family and its researcher in the eighties: Retrenching, renewing, and revitalizing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 263–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. E. (1991). The other half: Wives of alcoholics and their social-psychological situation. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. (1932). The pilgrims of Russian Town. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbalist, S. E. (1977). Historic themes and landmarks in social welfare research. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, C. C., & Frampton, M. E. (1935). Family and society: A study of the sociology of reconstruction. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Znaniecki, F. (1934). The method of sociology. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo, J. (2009). Rethinking family patriarchy and women’s positions in presocialist China. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 542–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane F. Gilgun PhD, LICSW .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilgun, J.F. (2013). Qualitative Family Research: Enduring Themes and Contemporary Variations. In: Peterson, G., Bush, K. (eds) Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics