Abstract
Functional behavioral assessment (FBA) refers to a range of methods designed to identify the environmental variables that control problematic behaviors. Methods for collecting these data revealing these variables include indirect measures, such as interviews and questionnaires, or direct methods, such as narrative recording of the antecedents that precede responses of interest and the consequences that follow them. Many behavior analysts believe that the “gold standard” of FBA is experimental functional analysis (FA) (Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richmond, 1982/1994), which systematically arranges consequences for problem behaviors to identify their functions, that is, the reinforcers that maintain those behaviors. FBA is one of several ways of collecting information about clients, and professional organizations such as the American Psychological Association (APA) and the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) have established general ethical guidelines regarding how assessments should be conducted and interpreted. For example, Standard 9 of the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct promulgated by the APA (2010) is devoted entirely to assessment. The same is true of Standard 3.0 of the Behavior Analyst Certification Board Guidelines for Responsible Conduct (BACB Guidelines, BACB 2011). That standard is presented in Table 13.1. Any practitioner who abides with the standards established there and elsewhere in the Guidelines is therefore behaving ethically, regardless of whether he or she is involved in functional assessment or another professional activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: 2010 Amendments. Washington, DC: Author.
Asmus, J. M., Vollmer, T. R., & Borrero, J. C. (2002). Functional behavioral assessment: A school based model. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 67–90.
Bailey, J. S., & Burch, M. R. (2011). Ethics for behavior analysts (2nd ed.). Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bambara, L. M., & Kern, L. (2005). Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans. New York: Guilford.
Barretto, A., Wacker, D. P., Harding, J., Lee, J., & Berg, W. K. (2006). Using telemedicine to conduct behavioral assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 333–340.
Behavior Analysis Certification Board. (2011). Guidelines for responsible conduct for behavior analysts. Retrieved from http://www.bacb.com/index.php?3page=57.
Blakeslee, T., Sugai, G., & Gruba, J. (1994). A review of functional assessment use in data-based intervention studies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 397–413.
Bloom, S. E., Iwata, B. A., Fritz, J. N., Roscoe, E. M., & Carreau, A. B. (2011). Classroom application of a trial-based functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 19–31.
Call, N. A., Pabico, R. S., & Lomas, J. E. (2009). Use of latency to problem behavior to evaluate demands for inclusion in functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 723–728.
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
Carr, E. G., Horner, R. H., Turnbill, A. P., Marquis, J. G., McLaughlin, D. D., McAtee, M. L., et al. (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: American Association for Mental Retardation.
Carr, J. E., Severtson, J. M., & Lepper, T. L. (2009). Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 44–57.
Chandler, L. K., & Dahlquist, C. M. (2010). Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school settings (3rd ed.). Columbus: Prentice Hall.
Crone, D. A., & Horner, R. H. (2000). Contextual, conceptual, and empirical foundations of functional behavioral assessment in schools. Exceptionality, 8, 161–172.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
Dukes, C., Rosenberg, H., & Brady, M. (2007). Effects of training in functional behavior assessment. International Journal of Special Education, 22, 163–173.
Ellingson, S. A., Miltenberger, R. G., Stricker, J., Galensky, T. L., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Functional assessment and intervention for challenging behaviors in the classroom by general classroom teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 85–97.
Ervin, R. A., Radford, P. M., Bertsch, K., Piper, A. L., Ehrhardt, K. E., & Poling, A. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Review, 30, 193–210.
Gresham, F. M., McIntyre, L. L., Olson-Tinker, H., Dolstra, L., McLaughlin, V., & Van, M. (2004). Relevance of functional behavioral assessment research for school-based interventions and positive behavioral support. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 19–37.
Gresham, F., Watson, T. S., & Skinner, C. H. (2001). Functional behavioral assessment: Principles, procedures, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 30, 156–172.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185.
Hastings, R. P., & Noone, S. J. (2005). SIB and FA: Ethics and evidence. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 335–342.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. (1997)
Ingram, K., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Sugai, G. (2005). Function-based intervention planning: Comparing the effectiveness of FBA function-based and non-function-based intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 224–236.
Irwin, R. A., Ehrhardt, K. E., & Poling, A. (2001). Functional assessment: Old wine in new bottles. School Psychology Review, 30, 173–179.
Irwin, R. A., Radford, P. M., Bertsch, K., Piper, A. L., Ehrhardt, K. E., & Poling, A. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Review, 30, 193–210.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982/1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20 (1982).
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). What makes extinction work: An analysis of procedural form and function. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 131–144.
Iwata, B. A., Wallace, M. D., Kahng, S. W., Lindberg, J. S., Roscoe, E. M., Conners, J., et al. (2000). Skill acquisition in the implementation of functional analysis methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 181–194.
Johnston, J. M., & Sherman, R. A. (1993). Applying the least restrictive alternative principle to treatment decisions: A legal and behavioral analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 103–115.
Kahng, S., & Iwata, B. A. (1999). Correspondence between outcomes of a brief and extended FA. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 149–160.
Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (1998). Ethics in psychology: Professional standards and cases. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kurtz, P. F., Chin, M. D., Huete, J. M., Tarbox, R. S. F., O’Connor, J. T., Paclawskyj, T. R., et al. (2003). Functional analysis and treatment of self-injurious behavior in young children a summary of 30 cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 205–219.
LaRue, R. H., Lenard, K., Weiss, M. J., Bamond, M., Palmieri, M., & Kelley, M. E. (2010). Comparison of traditional and trial-based methodologies for conducting functional analyses. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 480–487.
Latham, G. I. (2002). Behind the schoolhouse door: Managing chaos with science, skills, and strategies. North Logan: P & T Ink.
Le, D. D., & Smith, R. G. (2002). FA of self-injury with and without protective equipment. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 277–290.
Mace, F. C., & Knight, D. (1986). FA and treatment of severe pica. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 411–416.
Meyer, K. A. (1999). Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior exhibited by school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 229–232.
Moore, J. W., Edwards, R. P., Sterling-Turner, H. E., Riley, J., Dubard, M., & McGeorge, A. (2002). Teacher acquisition of functional analysis methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 72–77.
Moore, J. W., & Fisher, W. W. (2007). The effects of videotape modeling on staff acquisition of functional analysis methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 197–202.
National Institutes of Health. (1991). Treatment of destructive behaviors in persons with developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Neef, N. A., & Peterson, S. M. (2007). Functional behavior assessment. In J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, & W. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (pp. 500–524). Columbus: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Newcomer, L. L., & Lewis, T. J. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment: An investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 168–181.
Northup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., et al. (1991). A brief FA of aggression and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 509–522.
Parry, L. (1985). Least restrictive alternative: An overview of the concept. Mental and Physical Disabilities Law Reporter, 9, 963–972.
Peck Peterson, S. M., Derby, K. M., Berg, W. K., & Horner, R. H. (2002). Collaboration with families in the functional behavior assessment and intervention for severe behavior problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 5–25.
Pindiprolu, S. S., Peterson, S. M., & Bergloff, H. (2007). School personnel’s professional development needs and skill level with functional behavior assessments in ten midwestern states in the United States: Analysis and issues. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 8, 31–42.
Pindiprolu, S. S., Peterson, S. M. P., Rule, S., & Lignugaris/Kraft, B. (2003). Using web-mediated experiential case-based instruction to teach functional behavioral assessment skills. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 1–16.
Poling, A. (1994). Pharmacological treatment of behavioral problems in people with mental retardation: Some ethical considerations. In L. J. Hayes, G. J. Hayes, S. C. Moore, & P. M. Ghezzi (Eds.), Ethical issues in developmental disabilities (pp. 149–177). Reno: Context.
Poling, A., Ehrhardt, K., Wood, A., & Bowerman, R. (2010). Psychopharmacology and behavior analysis in autism treatment. In J. A. Matson & E. A. Mayville (Eds.), Behavioral foundations of effective autism treatment. New York: Sloan.
Romaniuk, C., Miltenberger, R., Conyers, C., Jenner, N., Jurgens, M., & Ringenberg, C. (2002). The influence of activity choice on problem behaviors maintained by escape versus attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 349–362.
Sasso, G. M., Reimers, T. M., Cooper, L. J., Wacker, D., Berg, W., Steege, M., et al. (1992). Use of descriptive and experimental analyses to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 809–821.
Schill, M. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1998). Functional assessment in behavioral consultation: A treatment utility study. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 116–140.
Scott, T. M., McIntyre, J., Liaupsin, C., Nelson, C. M., Conroy, M., & Payne, L. D. (2005). An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 205–215.
Shellady, S., & Stichter, J. P. (1999). Training preservice and inservice educators to conduct functional assessments: Initial issues and implications. Preventing School Failure, 43, 154–159.
Sigafoos, J., & Saggers, E. (1995). A discrete-trial approach to the functional analysis of aggressive behaviour in two boys with autism. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 20, 287–297.
Smith, C. M. (2005). Origin and uses of primum non nocere—above all, do no harm! The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 45, 371–377.
Steege, M. W., & Watson, T. S. (2008). Best practices in functional behavioral assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 347–248). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
Taylor, J., & Miller, M. (1997). When timeout works some of the time: The importance of treatment integrity and functional assessment. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 4–22.
Thomason-Sassi, J. L., Iwata, B. A., Neidert, P. L., & Roscoe, E. M. (2011). Latency as an index of response strength during functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 51–67.
Van Acker, R., Boreson, L., Gable, R. A., & Potterton, T. (2005). Are we on the right course? Lessons learned about current FBA/BIP practices in schools. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 35–56.
Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J. S., Foxx, R. M., Iwata, B. A., & Lovaas, O. I. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 381–384.
Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., Ringdahl, J. E., & Roane, H. S. (1995). Progressing from brief assessments to extended experimental analyses in the evaluation of aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 561–576.
Vollmer, T. R., & Northup, J. (1996). Some implications of functional analysis for school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 76–92.
Vollmer, T. R., & Smith, R. G. (1996). Some current themes in functional analysis research. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17, 229–249.
Wallace, M. D., Doney, J. K., Mintz-Resudek, C. M., & Tarbox, R. S. F. (2004). Training educators to implement functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 89–92.
Wallace, M. D., & Iwata, B. A. (1999). Effects of session duration on functional analysis outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 175–183.
Wallace, M. D., & Knights, D. J. (2003). An evaluation of a brief functional analysis format within a vocational setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 125–128.
Weeden, M., Mahoney, A., & Poling, A. (2010). SIB and FA: Where are the descriptions of participant protections? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 299–303.
Wilder, D. A., Chen, L., Atwell, J., Pritchard, J., & Weinstein, P. (2006). Brief functional analysis and treatment of tantrums associated with transitions in preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 103–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poling, A., Austin, J.L., Peterson, S.M., Mahoney, A., Weeden, M. (2012). Ethical Issues and Considerations. In: Matson, J. (eds) Functional Assessment for Challenging Behaviors. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3037-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3037-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3036-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3037-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)