Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Flow Model Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Flow Research

Abstract

This chapter addresses the question of what builds the basis for flow experiences to emerge. We focus our discussion on the situational antecedents of flow and emphasize the fact that the emergence of flow is basically dependent on a perceived fit of skills and task demands. We also refer to additional factors relevant regarding specific components of flow. In addition, we critically discuss the “above average” perspective and the related quadrant and octant models of flow highlighting the fact that the “above average” notion is based on problematic assumptions. Finally, we discuss determinants of flow intensity and propose a revised flow model which builds on the original notion of perceived fit of skills and task demands and includes the value attributed to the relevant activity as additional crucial factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from ‘how’ to ‘what’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 525–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, L., & Flynn, F. (2006). Leadership style and regulatory mode: Value from fit? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 216–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 324–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. G., & Haworth, J. T. (1994). “Flow” experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 511–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). A response to the Kimiecik & Stein and Jackson papers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 4, 181–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1991). Einführung in Teil IV. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Hrsg.), Die außergewöhnliche Erfahrung im Alltag. Die Psychologie des Flow-Erlebnisses (S. 275–290). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1992: Developmental perspectives on motivation, current theory and research in motivation, 1992 (Vol. 40, pp. 57–97). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). The general causality scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeManzano, Ö., Theorell, T., Harmat, L., & Ullén, F. (2010). The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing. Emotion, 10, 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1253–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Jones, J. R., Stinglhamber, F., Shanock, L., & Randall, A. T. (2005). Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 755–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 968–980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2004). The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 957–971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, moderators of challenge-skill-balance and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1992). Winning is not enough: The effects of competition and achievement orientation on intrinsic interest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, B. S., & Avsec, A. (2007). The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students. Horizons of Psychology, 17, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 904–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The joint effects of target and purpose goals on intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., & Sansone, C. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can get there from here. In M. L. Maehr & E. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 21–49). Greenwich: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., Cesario, J., Hagiwara, N., Spiegel, S., & Pittman, T. (2010). Increasing or decreasing interest in activities: The role of regulatory fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 559–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Spiegel, S. (2004). Promotion and prevention strategies for self- regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 171–187). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport & Experience Psychology, 18, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2006). Regulatory fit and cognitive performance: The interactive effect of chronic and situationally induced self-regulatory mechanisms on test performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., Bless, H., & Blomann, F. (2011a). Flow and the tunnel vision: Cognitive consequences of a skills-demands-compatibility. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., Bless, H., Blomann, F., & Kleinbohl, D. (2011b). Physiological aspects of flow experiences: Skills-demand-compatibility effects on heart rate variability and salivary cortisol. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 849–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Blomann, F. (2008). Locus of control and the flow experience: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Personality, 22, 589–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., Landhäußer, A., & Fischer, J. (2011c). Effects of a skills-demands-compatibility: Flow experiences and physiological reactions in an aversive activity. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., Ringelhan, S., & Blomann, F. (2011d). Does skills-demands-compatibility result in intrinsic motivation? Experimental test of a basic notion proposed in the theory of flow-experiences. Manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1975). The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory. Psychological Review, 82, 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Riter, A., Amitai, A., Margolin, B.-S., Shabtai, L., & Zaksh, D. (1975a). Can money inhance intrinsic motivation? A test of the content-consequence hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 744–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Riter, A., Arazi, D., Agasi, R., Montesquio, J., Peri, I., & Peretz, M. (1975b). Effects of task-intrinsic rewards upon extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S. (2000). To ‘do the right thing’ or to ‘just do it’: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793–815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1994a). A theory of action and state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 9–46). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1994b). Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the action-contol-scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 47–59). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 266–287). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64, 275–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195–206). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival, G., Crous, F., & Schepers, J. M. (2003). Cognitive potencial and job complexity as predictors of flow. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R. (2002). Flow im Alltag: Untersuchungen zum Quadrantenmodell des Flow-Erlebens und zum Konzept der autotelischen Perso ¨nlichkeit mit der Experience Sampling Method (ESM) [Flow in everyday life: Studies on the quadrant model of flow experiencing and on the concept of the autotelic personality with the experience sampling method (ESM)]. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Privette, G. (1983a). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1361–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Privette, G. (1983b). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1361–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, C., Lau, A., Hottenrott, K., & Stoll, O. (2006). Flow-Erleben unter kontrollierter Beanspruchungssteuerung: Ergebnisse einer Laufbandstudie [Flow experiences under controlled running work load: Results of a laboratory treadmill study]. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 13, 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. (2008). Intrinsic motivation and flow-experience. In H. Heckhausen & J. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 323–348). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U., & Roussakis, E. (2006a). Die Bedingungen des Flow-Erlebens in einer experimentellen Spielsituation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 214, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U., & Roussakis, E. (2006b). Die Bedingungen des Flow-Erlebens in einer experimentellen Spielsituation [Experimental conditions for experiencing flow in computer games]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie mit Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie und Sprache & Kognition, 214, 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüler, J. (2007). Arousal of flow experience in a learning setting and its effects on exam performance and affect. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüler, J. (2010). Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauer, J. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1999). Winning isn’t everything: Competition, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 209–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A., & Duval, T. S. (1971). Opinion change and performance facilitation as a result of objective self-awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany

    Johannes Keller & Anne Landhäußer

Authors
  1. Johannes Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Landhäußer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Keller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Fachbereich I - Psychologie, Universität Trier, Trier, 54286, Germany

    Stefan Engeser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keller, J., Landhäußer, A. (2012). The Flow Model Revisited. In: Engeser, S. (eds) Advances in Flow Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation