Abstract
Findings of empirical researches in reference to several models of conflict resolution constructed by Western psychologists were reviewed to demonstrate the limitation of imposed etic approach, some indigenous models were also criticized for their emic approach of naïve positivism. Based on the premise of methodological relationalism, it argued that a theoretical framework for managing conflicts with vertical in-group, horizontal out-group, or horizontal in-group people should consider the following aspects: (1) harmony maintenance, (2) personal goal attainment, (3) coordination strategies, and (4) dominant responses.
When a subordinate is in conflict with his/her superior in a vertical relationship, s/he has to protect his/her superior’s face for the sake of maintaining interpersonal harmony. In this case, the dominant response may be endurance. If s/he wants to express his/her opinion, s/he usually uses the strategy of indirect communication. If s/he intends to pursue his/her personal goal, s/he may do so privately.
The conflict management strategies one may utilize in a horizontal relationship depend on whether the other party is an in-group or out-group member. When an actor is in conflict with an in-group member, they may communicate directly. In order to maintain a harmonious relationship, they may “give face” to each other and reach a compromise. When one of them insists on attaining his/her personal goal in spite of the other’s feelings, they may struggle amid confrontations until the issue is resolved. On the other hand, if both of them insist on attaining their personal goals, they may treat each other as out-group members and confront each other. Meanwhile, they may disregard interpersonal harmony and strive to protect their own face. In order to resolve the conflict, a third party may be invited to serve as a mediator, and the relationship may be severed as a consequence of their conflict.
When a superior insists on the attainment of his/her personal goal disregarding feelings of his/her subordinate in a vertical relationship, the subordinate may also oppose him/her in reaction, leading to the severance of their relationship.
Findings of empirical researches were cited to elaborate the major propositions of the aforementioned framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Double Day.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Bond, M. H., & Wang, S. H. (1981). Aggressive behavior in Chinese society: The problem of maintaining order and harmony. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23, 57–73.
Brew, F. P., & Cairns, D. R. (2004). Styles of managing interpersonal workplace conflict in relation to status and face concerns: A study with Anglos and Chinese. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 27–56.
Brown, B. R. (1977). Face-saving and face-restoration in negotiation. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social-psychological perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Chan, D. K. S., & Goto, S. G. (2003). Conflict resolution in the culturally diverse workplace: Some data from Hong Kong employees. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 441–460.
Che, S. H. (1997). Wondering in and out: The power relationship between the bride and her mother-in-law (in Chinese). Unpublished Master thesis, Taipei: Soochow University.
Chen, R. J. C. (1992). The nature, process, and influence of marriage violence in Taiwan (in Chinese). Journal of Female and Sex, 3, 117–147.
Chen, S. W. (1994). Social relationships and the choices of conflict resolution procedures: In a perspective of patterns of the properties of relationships (in Chinese). Unpublished Master thesis, National Taiwan University.
Chen, J., Chen, L., & Zhang, J. (2006). A research on the styles of handling superior-subordinate conflicts: Its questionnaire and analysis. Psychological Science (China), 29, 926–928.
Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Co-operative conflict management: An approach to strengthen relationships between foreign managers and Chinese employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45, 271–294.
Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D., & Fang, S. S. (2005). Working with foreign managers: Conflict management for effective leader relationships in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 265–286.
Chiao, J. (1981). A preliminary research of stratagems in Chinese culture (in Chinese). In Y. Y. Li & J. Chiao (Eds.), Chinese people, society and culture. Taipei: Shihuo Press.
Chiao, J. (1985). A preliminary model of Chinese strategic behaviors (in Chinese). In K. S. Yang (Ed.), Chinese psychology. Taipei: Laureate Book Co.
Chiu, R. K., & Kosinski, F. A. (1994). Is Chinese conflict-handling behavior influenced by Chinese values? Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 81–90.
Cohen, J. A. (1967). Chinese mediation on the eve of modernization. In D. C. Buxbaum (Ed.), Traditional and modern legal institutions in Asia and Africa. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Fu, C. W. H. (1986). Critical succession and creative development. Taipei, Taiwan: Dong-Da Publishing co.
Fu, H., Watkins, D., & Hui, E. K. P. (2004). Personality correlates of the disposition towards interpersonal forgiveness: A Chinese perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 305–316.
Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
Hall, J. (1969). Conflict management survey. Rochester, NY: Technometrics.
Holmes, J. G., & Miller, D. T. (1976). Interpersonal conflict. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 265–308). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Holt, J. L., & DeVore, C. J. (2005). Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 165–196.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychological homeostasis and jen: Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23–44.
Huang, L. L. (1996). The harmony and conflict in Chinese social relationships: Theory and empirical analysis (in Chinese). Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, National Taiwan University.
Hwang, K. K. (1995). The contemporary transformation of Confucian values: Theoretical values and empirical research (in Chinese). Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 3, 276–338.
Hwang, K. K. (1997a). The whirlpool of power (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Business Weekly.
Hwang, K. K. (1997b). Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7, 17–37.
Hwang, K. K. (2005). Concepts of face in Chinese Society. In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, & C. F. Yang (Eds.), Indigenous psychological research (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Lanreate Book Co.
King, A. Y. C. (1988). “Face”, “shame” and an analysis of Chinese behavior (in Chinese). In K. S. Yang (Ed.), Chinese psychology. Taipei, Taiwan: Laureate Book Co.
Kirkbride, P. S., Tang, S. F., & Westwood, R. I. (1991). Chinese conflict preferences and negotiation behavior: Cultural and psychological influences. Organization Studies, 12, 365–386.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuo, S.-H. (1994). Argumentative strategies in Chinese political talks. Proceedings of the National Science Council, ROC Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 88–105.
LaBarre, W. (1945). Some observations on character structure in the Orient. Psychiatry, 8, 319–342.
Laudan, L. (1977/1992). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Lee, M. L. (1994). The Chinese concept of Ren (forbearance): Theory and empirical analysis (in Chinese). Unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan University.
Lee, S. Y. (2003). The effect of culture and self-construal on face-concerns and mediation techniques of an informal third-party intermediary in intercultural/ interpersonal conflict. Dissertations Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 63, 3790.
Leung, K. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 898–908.
Leung, K. (1988). Some determinants of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 125–136.
Leung, K., & Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134–1140.
Li, Y. Y. (1988). Ancestor workshop and the psychological stability of family members in Taiwan. In K. Yoshimatsu & W. S. Tseng (Eds.), Asian family mental health (pp. 26–33). Tokyo: Psychiatric Research Institute of Tokyo.
Li, Y. Y. (1992). In search of equilibrium and harmony: On the basic value orientation of traditional Chinese peasants. In C. Nakane & C. Chiao (Eds.), Home bound: Studies in East Asian society (pp. 127–148). Hong Kong: The Center for East Asian Cultural Studies.
Li, T. S. (1995). The interaction process of couples: A preliminary investigation on young couples in Taipei (in Chinese). Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 4, 260–321.
Li, M. C. (1997). The properties and functions of Chinese important social relationship: Parents and Children (in Chinese). Paper presented at the Vocational Class of Indigenous Psychology, National Taiwan University.
Lin, Z. J., & Lin, H. Y. (1999). The process of coping with the conflicts between parents and children among junior high school students. Indigenous Psychological Research, 12, 47–101.
Lin, W. Y., & Wang, C. W. (1995). Chinese parents’ views about child-rearing: Discipling or beating (in Chinese)? Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 3, 2–92.
Liu, H. Q. (1999). A dialectic perspective on the process of conflicts between husband and wife. Indigenous Psychological Research, 11, 153–202.
Lung, A. Y. (2000). Parent-adolescent conflict and resolution in Chinese American and causation families (cross cultural, intergenerational conflict). Dissertations Abstracts International Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 60, 3571.
Ma, R. (1992). The role of unofficial intermediaries in interpersonal conflicts in the Chinese culture. Communication Quarterly, 40, 267–278.
Ma, Z. Z. (2007). Chinese conflict management styles and negotiation behaviors: An empirical test. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7, 101–119.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Niber, R., & Harris, K. L. (2003). The effect of culture and cohesiveness on intragroup conflict and effectiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 143(5), 613–631.
Niem, C. T. I., & Collard, R. R. (1972). Parental discipline of aggressive behaviors in four-year-old Chinese and American children. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7, 95–96.
Oetzel, J., Ting-Toomey, S., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X. H., Takai, J., et al. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 68, 235–258.
Ogawa, N. (1999). The concept of facework: Its functions in the Hawaii model of mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 17, 5–20.
Rahim, M. A. (1986). Managing conflict in organizations. New York: Praeger.
Ryback, D., Sanders, A. L., Lorentz, J., & Koestenblatt, M. (1980). Child-rearing practices reported by students in six cultures. Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 153–162.
Sampson, E. E. (1985). The decentralization of identity: Toward a revised concept of personal and social order. American Psychologist, 36, 730–743.
Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43, 15–22.
Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sollenberger, R. T. (1968). Chinese-American child-rearing practices and juvenile delinquency. Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 13–23.
Solomon, R. H. (1971). Mao’s revolution and the Chinese political culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sterba, R. L. (1978). Clandestine management in the imperial Chinese bureaucracy. Academy of Management Review, 3, 69–78.
Stover, L. E. (1974). The cultural ecology of Chinese civilization. New York: PICA Press.
Sweeney, B., & Carrutbers, W. L. (1996). Conflict resolution: History, philosophy, theory, and educational applications. School Counselor, 43, 326–344.
Tang, S. F., & Kirkbride, P. S. (1986). Developing conflict management skills in Hong Kong: An analysis of some cross-cultural implications. Management Education and Development, 17, 287–301.
Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1985). Toward a theory of conflict and culture. In W. Gudykunst, L. Stewart, & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Communication, culture, and organizational processes (pp. 71–86). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, S. (Ed.). (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. New York: State University of New York-Albany Press.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Oetzel, J. G. (2001). Managing intercultural conflict effectively. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tinsley, C. H., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Managing workplace conflict in the United States and Hong Kong. Behaviors and Human Decision Process, 85, 360–381.
Tinsley, C. H., & Weldon, E. (2003). Response to a normative conflict among American and Chinese managers. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3, 183–194.
Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (2001). Constructive conflict in China: Cooperative conflict as a bridge between East and West. Journal of World Business, 36, 166–183.
Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Sun, H. F. (2004). Can Chinese discuss conflict openly? Field and experimental studies of face dynamics in China. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 351–373.
Tjosvold, D., Leung, K., & Johnson, D. W. (2006). Co-operative and competitive conflict in China. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: The theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 671–692). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Tjosvold, D., Nibler, R., & Wan, P. (2001). Motivation for conflict among Chinese university students: Effects of others’ expertise and one’s own confidence on engaging in conflict. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 353–363.
Tjosvold, D., Poon, M., & Yu, Z. Y. (2005). Team effectiveness in China: Co-operative conflict for relationship building. Human Relations, 58, 341–367.
Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. (2001). Effects of influence tactics and social contexts in conflict: An experiment on relationships in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 239–258.
Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. (2002). Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivations, actions and consequences. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 142–164.
Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. (2003). Openness among Chinese in conflict: Effects of direct discussion and warmth on integrative decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1878–1897.
Walder, A. G. (1983). Organized dependency and cultures of authority in Chinese industry. Journal of Asian Studies, 43, 51–76.
Wall, J. A., & Blum, M. (1991). Community mediation in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 3–20.
Wallner, F. (1994). Constructive realism: Aspects of new epistemological movement. Vienna: W. BraumŸller.
Wang, R. H. (1996). The logic of using stratagems by traditional Chinese (in Chinese). Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, National Taiwan University.
Ward, B. E. (1965). Varieties of the conscious model: The fisherman of South China. In M. Bauton (Ed.), The relevance of models for social anthropology. London: Travistock.
Westwood, R. I., Tang, S. F., & Kirkbride, P. S. (1992). Chinese conflict behavior: Antecedents and behavioral consequence. Organization Development Journal, 10, 13–19.
Wolf, M. (1970). Child training and the Chinese family. In M. Freedman (Ed.), Family and kinship in Chinese society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Wong, C. L., Tjosvold, D., & Lee, F. (1992). Managing conflict in a diverse work force: A Chinese perspective in North America. Small Group Research, 23, 302–321.
Xu, X. Y. (1994). People’s conciliation: A model of conflict management of civil disputes in China. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5, 326–342.
Yan, J., & Sorenson, R. L. (2004). The influence of Confucian ideology on conflict in Chinese family business. Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4, 5–17.
Yang, C. F. (1988). Familism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China Mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In D. Sinha & H. S. R. Kao (Eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives. New Delhi: Sage.
Yeh, K. H. (1995). Solution types in filial dilemmas and their various correlates. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica, 79, 87–118.
Yeh, K. H., & Bedford, O. (2004). Filial belief and parent-child. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 132–144.
Zai, S. W. (1995). Chinese views of Lian and Mian. Taipei: Laureate Book Co.
Zhang, Y. B. (2004). Initiating factors of Chinese intergenerational conflict: Young adults’ written accounts. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 19, 299–319.
Zhang, V. B., Harwood, J., & Hummert, M. L. (2005). Perceptions of conflict management styles in Chinese intergenerational dyads. Communication Monographs, 72, 71–91.
Zou, T. H. (1995). The reasons of obeying publicly and defying privately: A preliminary research of the action logic in traditional Chinese society (in Chinese). Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, National Taiwan University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hwang, KK. (2012). Chinese Models of Conflict Resolution. In: Foundations of Chinese Psychology. International and Cultural Psychology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1438-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1439-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)