Skip to main content

Juvenile Assault Arrestees and Their Incidents: Same and Opposite Gender Relationships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Delinquent Girls

Abstract

Although boys still account for the lion’s share of juvenile arrests, the increase in girls’ arrests for assault is receiving considerable attention from policy makers and practitioners (see Chap. 11). At issue in this debate is whether the gender crime gap is changing, and particularly whether females are becoming more violent. Some attribute the trend of increases in female arrests to a combination of re-labeling family conflicts as violent offenses and changes in police practices when responding to domestic incidents (Chesney-Lind 2002; Chesney-Lind and Pasko 2004; Feld 2009). Others argue that economic marginalization and males’ greater engagement in familiar roles have narrowed the gender crime gap for violent offenses (Heimer 2000; Messer and Rosenfeld 2007; Lauritsen et al. 2009). Others assert that the arrest trends actually reflect police behavior, a “widening of the net” and/or “charging up” of less serious offenses (Steffensmeier and Schwartz 2003; see Chap. 1 for a detailed discussion of all of these issues). Research consistently shows that since changes in domestic violence mandatory arrest laws were enacted, the female share of arrests for violent crime has increased (Buzawa and Hotaling 2006; Hirschel et al. 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Intimidation is a form of domestic violence wherein a person controls their partner’s actions, relationships, and activities through the use of gestures, looks, and actions.

References

  • Binder, A., & Meeker, J. (1988). Experiments as reforms. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E. (1982). Police officer response to domestic violence legislation in Michigan. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10, 415–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (1985). Legislative trends in the criminal justice response to domestic violence. In A. Lincoln & M. Straus (Eds.), Crime and the family. New York: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E., & Gerald, H. (2000). The police response to domestic violence calls for assistance in three Massachusetts towns: Final report. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E. S., & Hotaling, G. T. (2006). The impact of relationship status, gender, and minor status in the police response to domestic assault. Victims and Offenders, 1(4), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). Out of sight, out of mind: girls in the juvenile justice system. In C. Renzetti & L. Goodstein (Eds.), Women, crime, and criminal justice. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest policies for girls and women. Criminology and Public Policy, 1(2), 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2004). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (2009). Violent girls or relabeled status offenders? An alternative interpretation of the data. Crime and Delinquency, 55(2), 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, K. (2000). Changes in the gender gap in crime and women’s economic marginalization. Criminal Justice, 1, 427–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschel, D., Buzawa, E., Pattavina, A., & Faggiani, D. (2007). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: to what extent do they influence police arrest decisions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98, 255–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, J. K., Heimer, J., & Lynch, J. (2009). Trends in the gender gap in violent offending: New evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminology, 47, 261–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messer, S., & Rosenfeld, R. (2007). Crime and the American Dream (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence. Violence & Victims, 7, 1339–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffit, T., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior: conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin longitudinal study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. S., Leana, A. B., Joel, G., & Lauara, H. (2006). The influence of legal reform on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Justice Quarterly, 23, 297–316.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. (2001). Women, danger and criminology. In C. Renzetti & L. Goodstein (Eds.), Women, crime and criminal justice. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing, 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. (1993). National trends in female arrests, 1960–1990: Assessment and recommendations for research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 413–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., & Allan, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., & Schwartz, J. (2003). Contemporary explanations of women’s crime. In B. R. Price & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women. New York: McGraw-Hill, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., Schwartz, J., Zhong, S. H., & Ackerman, J. (2005). An assessment of recent trends in girls’ violence using diverse longitudinal sources: Is the gender gap closing? Criminology, 43, 355–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families; risk factors and adaptions to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1990). How violent are American families: Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies. In M. A. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families; risk factors and adaptions to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne L. Stahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stahl, A.L., Coontz, P. (2012). Juvenile Assault Arrestees and Their Incidents: Same and Opposite Gender Relationships. In: Miller, S., Leve, L., Kerig, P. (eds) Delinquent Girls. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0415-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics