Abstract
There is much we agree with and appreciate in Paul Wachtel’s presentation, as readers of our chapter will readily discern. In that chapter we asserted that some psychoanalytic and behavior therapists may be prepared to effect an integration of the kind Wachtel proposes because of their willingness to compromise on the perspectives, visions, and values that are inherent in their preferred approaches. Others, we said, will not be so inclined. Wachtel points the way to integration by emphasizing certain aspects of psychoanalytic (or psychodynamic) theory and practice while deemphasizing others. Although we agree with his choice of elements for inclusion in a definition of the psychodynamic approach, we feel that he has excluded elements quite as central that we cannot readily forego. By focusing on our objections, we hope to clarify what makes integration difficult for many psychoanalytic therapists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Messer, S.B., Winokur, M. (1984). Psychoanalytic Therapy versus Psychodynamic Therapy. In: Arkowitz, H., Messer, S.B. (eds) Psychoanalytic Therapy and Behavior Therapy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2733-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2733-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9694-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2733-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive