Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis reflect respectively two different approaches to the philosophy of science. To understand the differences between these two approaches, we must first consider their philosophical background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aune, B. Rationalism, empiricism, and pragmatism. New York: Random House, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., and Bonett, D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C. [An introduction to the study of experimental medicine.](H. C. Green, trans.). New York: Dover Publications, 1957. (First published in France in 1865 and first issued in an English translation in 1927.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. A realist theory of science. Leeds, U.K.: Leeds Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, E. B., and Brody, N. Intelligence: Nature, determinants, and consequences. New York: Academic Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. Causality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. Physics and reality. In E. A. MacKinnon (Ed.), The problem of scientific realism. New York: Appleton—Century—Crofts, 1972. (Originally published in Dialectica: Revue Internationale de Philosophie de la connaissance,1966, 20,174–195.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. Factor analysis. New York: Harper Brothers, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., Raymond B. Cattell. In G. Lindzey (Ed.) A history of psychology in autobiography. Vol. VI. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974, pp. 59–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaddock, R. E. Principles and methods of statistics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. Essentials of psychological testing ( 3rd ed. ). New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, G. H. American science in the age of Jackson. New York: Columbia University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. J. Mathematics and the moral sciences: The rise and fall of the probability of judgments, 1785–1840. In H. N. Jahnke and M. Otte (Eds.), Epistemological and social problems of the sciences in the early nineteenth century. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. The quest for certainty. New York: Paragon Books, 1979. (Originally published in 1929.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K. Problems of empiricism. In R. G. Colodny, (Ed.), Beyond the edge of certainty. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K. Classical empiricism. In R. E. Butts and J. W. Davis (Eds.), The methodological heritage of Newton. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaton, F. Inquiries into human faculty and its development. New York: AMS Press, 1973. (Reprint of 1908 edition.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. The structure of the intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53, 267–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 1959, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw—Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. Multiple group methods for common-factor analysis: Their basis, computation, and interpretation. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. The determining of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common-factor theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955, 8, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. A. structural theory for intergroup beliefs and attitudes. American Sociological Review, 1959, 24, 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. A faceted definition of intelligence. In R. Eiferman (Ed.), Studies in psychology, Scripta Hierosolymitana. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, K. J. A simple method of factor-analysis. Psychometrika, 1944, 9, 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965. (Originally published in 1888 based on original three-volume edition published in 1739.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., and Gerbing, D. W. Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis and causal models. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Vol. IV. Greenwich, Conn.: Jai Press, 1982, pp. 267–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingmire, A. E., Taylor, C. W., Darragh, R., Geitgey, D., Gross, Y., Orwig, B. I. Popiel, E., Smith, F. L., Smith, H. H., Van Sant, G. E., and Mulaik, S. A. The effectiveness of a leadership program in nursing. Boulder, Co.: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., and Brett, J. M. Causal analysis: Assumptions, models and data. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika, 1970, 57, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology. Vol. II. San Francisco: Freeman, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. Structural equation models in the social sciences: specification, estimation, and testing. In J. Magidson (Ed.) Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. Boston: Abt Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Goldberger, A. S. A factor analysis by generalized least squares. Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. LISREL IV users guide. Chicago: National Educational Resources, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. Research Report 81–8, Department of Statistics, University of Uppsala, Sweden, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, Ind.: Scientific Software Inc., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L., and Kluegel, J. R. Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix: Some limitations and an alternative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, W. On hypotheses and hypotheticism. In J. Agassi, and R. S. Cohen (Eds.), Scientific philosophy today. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. The sources of modern methodology. In R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (Eds.), Historical and philosophical dimensions of logic, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, Holland: Ridel, 1977, pp. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. Why was the logic of discovery abandoned? In T. Nickles (Ed.) Scientific discovery, logic and rationality. (Boston studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 56 ). Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel, 1980, pp. 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. Science and hypothesis. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, V. F. Causality in natural science. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losee, J. A historical introduction to the philosophy of science ( 2nd ed. ). London: Oxford University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1978, 31, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures: Some remarks on applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1980, 33, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., and Mulaik, S. A. Determinacy of common factors: A nontechnical review. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manicas, P. T., and Secord, P. F. Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 1983, 38, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellenbergh, G. J., Kelderman, H., Stijlen, J. G., and Zondag, E. Linear models for the analysis and construction of instruments in a facet design. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 766–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. A system of logic. New York: Longmans, Green, 1891. (First published in 1843.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. D. Logic of causal analysis: From experimental to nonexperimental designs. In H. M. Blalock (Ed.), Causal models in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine–Atherton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw–Hill, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. Confirmatory factor analysis. In D. J. Amick and H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Introductory multivariate analysis. Berkeley: McCutchan, 1975, pp. 170–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. A critical history of the origins of exploratory statistics in 19th century British empiricism. Paper presented to the Society for Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Fort Worth, Texas, November 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. How should we overidentify structural equation models? Paper read at the annual meeting of the Society for Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Atlanta, Georgia, November 4–6, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. Exploratory statistics and empiricism. Philosophy of Science, 1985, 52, 410–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. Toward a conception of causality applicable to experimentation and causal modeling. Child Development, 1987a, 58, 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. A brief history of the philosophical foundations of exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1987b, 22, 267–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A., and McDonald, R. P. The effect of additional variables on factor indeterminacy. Psychometrika, 1978, 43, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. The grammar of science. (Part I—Physical.) London: Adam & Charles Black, 1911. (Original edition 1892.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Science editions, 1959. (First published in 1934 and translated by the author.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Quetelet, M. A. [Letters addressed to H. R. H. the Grand Duke of Saxe Coburg and Gotha, on the theory of probability as applied to the moral and political sciences.](O. G. Downes, trans.). London: Charles & Edwin Layton, 1849. (Originally published as Lettres… sur la theorie des probabilities. Brussels, 1846.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. On the reasons for indeterminacy of translation. The Journal of Philosophy, 1970, 67, 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P. H., and Steiger, J. H. Regression component analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1976, 29, 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shye, S. On the search for laws in the behavioral sciences. In S. Shye (Ed.), Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass, 1978, pp. 2–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., and Schönemann, P. H. A history of factor indeterminacy. In S. Shye (Ed.), Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioural sciences. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass, 1978, pp. 136–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. Note about the multiple group method. Psychometrika, 1949, 14, 43–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, R. C. Cluster analysis. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Edwards, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F., Peacock, A. C., and Jackson, D. N. A comparison of component and factor patterns: A Monte Carlo approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1982, 17, 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. C. A history of the association psychology. New York: Scribner’s, 1921.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W. The philosophy of the inductive sciences founded upon their history (2nd ed.). 2 volumes. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1967. (Originally published in 1847.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, U. The applications of the method of correlation to social and economic studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1909, 72, 721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule, U. An introduction to the theory of statistics. London: Griffin, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mulaik, S.A. (1988). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In: Nesselroade, J.R., Cattell, R.B. (eds) Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8232-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0893-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics