Skip to main content

Structuralist Theories in Environment — Behavior — Design Research

Applications For Analyses of People and the Built Environment

  • Chapter
Advance in Environment, Behavior, and Design

Part of the book series: Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design ((AEBD,volume 2))

Abstract

Structuralist theories and methods have gained momentum since the late 19th century, largely owing to the exchange theory of the French anthropologist Marcel Mauss, the linguistic theories of Roman Jakobson at the Prague school of structural linguistics, and the contribution of Ferdinand de Saussure. Nonetheless, structural explanation became an integral part of analytical approaches in the social sciences only in the second half of this century, largely as a result of the contributions of the French anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss, the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, and the Marxism of Louis Althusser. Today, there are published studies in fields including archaeology (Clarke, 1977; Hodder, 1982), architecture (Eco, 1972, 1973, 1976; Glassie, 1975; LÜchinger, 1981), linguistics (Macksey & Donato, 1972; Sturrock, 1979), social anthropology (Leach, 1976; Lévi-Strauss, 1968), and urban sociology (Castells, 1977, 1978). This complex range of contributions cannot be considered a unified set that suggests a shared perspective and a linear development of structure theory and method. For example, although the interpretation of Lévi-Strauss owes much to Mauss and Jakobson (Badcock, 1975; Chiari, 1975), the advocates of structural Marxism reject the overriding importance which his cognitive structuralism attributes to symbolic dimensions and a synchronic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, C. (1980). The language analogy. Architectural Association Quarterly, 12(3), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badcock, C. (1975). Lévi-Strauss: Structuralism and sociological theory. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of semiology. London: Jonathan Cape. (Translated from Eléments de sémiologie by A. Lavers & C. Smith. Paris: Éditions Gonthier, 1965.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontà, J. (1979). Architecture and its interpretation. London: Lund Humphries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1971). The uses of structuralism. London: Heinemann. (Translated from A quoi sert la notion de structure by M. Vaughan. Paris: Gallimard, 1968.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Translated from Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique by R. Nice. Genève: Libraire Droz, 1977.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, G. (1980). Architectural objects and their design as a subject for semiotic studies. Design Studies, 1(4), 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, G., Bunt, R., & Jencks, C. (Eds.) (1980a). Signs, symbols and architecture. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, G., Bunt, R., & Llorens, T. (Eds.). (1980b). Meaning and behaviour in the built environment. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1977). The urban question: A marxist approach. London: Edward Arnold. (Translated from La question urbaineby A. Sheridan. Paris: Maspero, 1972.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1978). City, class and power. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiari, J. (1975). Twentieth-century French thought: From Bergson to Lévi-Strauss. London: Paul Elek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (Ed.) (1977). Spatial archaeology. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, A. (1981). Essays in architectural criticism: Modern architecture and historical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. (1973). The linguistic basis of structuralism. In D. Robey (Ed.), Structuralism: An introduction. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxtater, D. (1984). Spadai opposition in non-discursive expression: architecture as ritual process. Canadian Journal of Anthropology, 4(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1972). The componential analysis of the architectural sign/column. Semiotica,5(2), 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1973). Function and sign: Semiotics of architecture. In J. Bryan & R. Sauer (Eds.), Structures implicit and explicit. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, U. (1981). The secret of the case Giuliani Frigerio. Environment and Planing B, 8(1), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1976). New rules for sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassie, H. (1975). Folk housing in middle Virginia. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. (1978). Ideology, science and human geography. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D., & Urry, J. (Eds.). (1985). Social relations and spatial structures. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groat, L. (1981). Meaning in architecture: New directions and sources. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1(1), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groat, L. (1987). Recent developments in architectural theory: Implications for empirical research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7(1), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, R. (Ed.). (1972). People and buildings. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harloe, M. (Ed.). (1976). Captive cities. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, G. (1976). Enlightenment and despair: A history of sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., & Leaman, A. (1973). The man-environment paradigm and its paradoxes. Architectural Design, 63(8), 507–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Leaman, A. Stanstall, P., & Bedford, M. (1976). Space syntax. Environment and Planning B, 3(2), 147–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B., & Hirst, P. (1975). Pre-capitalist modes of production. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B., & Hirst, P. (1977). Mode of production and social formation. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (Ed.). (1982). Symbolic and structural anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P., & Smith, S. (1984). Exploring social geography. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Baird, G. (Eds.). (1969). Meaning in architecture. London: Barrie & Rockcliff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, P. (1984). Symbolism, styles, and settings: The built environment and the imperatives of urbanized capitalism. Architecture and Behaviour, 2(2), 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, M. (1979). Meaning in the urban environment. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. (Ed.). (1970). Structuralism: A reader. London: Jonathon Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, M. (1981). Boundaries in the built environment: Concepts and examples. Man-Environment Systems, 11(5/6), 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. (1982). Domestic space and society: A cross-cultural study. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 24(1), 104–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. (1986). Le seuil franchi: Logement populaire et vie quotidienne en Suisse romande, 1860–1960. Geneva: Georg Editeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. (1987). Housing, dwellings and homes: Design theory, research, and practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. (1970). Lévi-Strauss. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. (1976). Culture and communication: The logic by which symbols are connected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. (1978). Does space syntax really "constitute the sodar’? In D. Green, C. Haselgrove, & M. Spriggs (Eds.), Social organisation and settlement: Contributions from anthropology, archaeology and geography. Oxford: BAR International Series (Supplementary No. 47).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebas, E. (1982). Urban and regional sociology in advanced industrial societies: A decade of Marxist and critical perspectives. Current Sociology, 30 (Whole No. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1972). La pensée marxiste et la ville. Paris: Casterman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1968). Structural anthropology. London: Allen Lane. (Translated from Anthropologie structurale by C. Jacobsen and B. Schoepf. Paris: Plön, 1958.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüchinger, A. (1981). Structuralism in architecture and urban planning.Stuttgart: Karl Krämer Verlag. (Three-langauge edition.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1973). Structuralism and linguistics. In D. Robey (Ed.), Structuralism: An introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macksey, R., & Donato, E. (Eds.). (1972). The structuralist controversy: The languages of criticism and the sciences of man. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1929). The sexual life of savages in northwestern Melanesia: An ethnographic account of courtship, marriage, and family life among the natives of the Trobriand Islands, British New Guinea. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, T. (1987). Buildings as classifying devices. Environment and Planning B, 14(4), 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Necipoglu, G. (1981). Book review of G. Broadbent et al. Signs, symbols and architecture. (Chichester: Wiley, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Necipoglu, G. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 40(3), 259–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1971). Structuralism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Translated from Le Structuralisme by C. Maschler. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1968.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Preziosi, D. (1979). The semiotics of the built environment: An introduction to architectonic analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: Towards a man-environment approach to urban form and design. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. (Ed.). (1973). Structuralism: An introduction. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D. (1986). Behavioral conventions and archaeology: Methods for the analysis of ancient architecture. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de (1974). Course in general linguistics. Glasgow: William Collins. (Translated from Cours de linguistique générale by W. Baskin. Lausanne: Payot, 1916.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1980).The socio-spatial dialectic Annals of the Association of American Geographers’, 70(2), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1985). The spatiality of social life: Towards a transformative retheorisation. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G., & Mitchell, W. (1978a). Counting Palladian plans. Environment and Planning B, 5(2), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G., & Mitchell, W. (1978b). The Palladian grammar. Environment and Planning B, 5(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturrock, J. (Ed.). (1979). Structuralism and since: From Lévi-Strauss to Derrida. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (1982). Social formation, social structures and social change. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawrence, R.J. (1989). Structuralist Theories in Environment — Behavior — Design Research. In: Zube, E.H., Moore, G.T. (eds) Advance in Environment, Behavior, and Design. Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0717-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0717-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8047-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0717-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics