Abstract
Doctors and journalists traditionally regard one another with mutual distrust. In my experience as a physician covering medicine for the Washington Post, and more recently as the author of a health column for Cosmopolitan Magazine, I have been amply exposed to the grudges and prejudices each profession holds toward the other. Physicians frequently get the chance to observe the spats and reconciliations in this rocky relationship, when members of one camp or the other hold forth on the editorial pages of medical journals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson JE, Morrell DC, Avery AJ, Watkins CJ. Evaluation of a patient education manual. Br Med J 1980;281:924–6.
Bander MS. The physician and the press. N Engl J Med 1975;293:402–3.
Barclay WR. Science reporting to alarm the public. J Am Med Assoc 1979; 242:754.
Cassileth BR, et al. Informed consent—why are its goals imperfectly realized? N Engl J Med 1980;302:896–900.
Davis JP, Vergeront JM. The effect of publicity on the reporting of toxic-shock syndrome in Wisconsin. J Inf Dis 1982;145:449–57.
Dakey L, Dakey S. Journal editors and the press: cooperation not conflict (letter). J Am Med Assoc 1981;245:2296–7.
Freimuth VS. Assessing the readability of health education messages. Public Health Rep 1979;94:568–70.
Grace J. Bridging the gap between medicine and the media. Can Med Assoc J 1980;122:450–2.
Gray JAM. Preparing a leaflet for patient education. Br Med J 1982;284:1171–2.
Greenberg DS. The press and health care. N Engl J Med 1977;297:231–2.
Houston TP. Alternatives in patient education: using the commercial media (letter). N Engl J Med 1982;306:998.
Laher M, et al. Educational value of printed information for patients with hypertension. Br Med J 1981;282:1360–1.
Manning D. Writing readable health messages. Public Health Rep 1981;96:464–5.
Morrow GR. How readable are subject consent forms? J Am Med Assoc 1980;244:56–8.
Okie S. A second opinion on children’s ear surgery. Washington Post 1981 May 27:C1.
Okie S. Dangerous formula. Washington Post 1979 Oct. 10:A1.
Okie S. Mystery disease in women tied to tampon use. Washington Post 1980 June 28:A1.
Okie S. ‘Runaway’ TB in District: a public health failure. Washington Post 1979 Nov. 24:A1.
Okie S. Surgeon rebuilds a face—and a life. Washington Post 1980 Aug. 31:Al.
Proudfoot AD, Proudfoot J. Medical reporting in the lay press. Med J Australia 1981;1:8–9.
Rourk MH, Hock RA, Pursell JS, Jones D, Spöck A. The news media and the doctor- patient relationship. N Engl J Med 1981;305:1278–80.
Soffer A. Patient education versus irresponsible journalism. Heart Lung 1978; 7:245–6.
Spadaro DC, Robinson LA, Smith LT. Assessing readability of patient information materials. Am J Hosp Pharm 1980;37:215–21.
Strunk WS, White EB. The elements of style. New York: Macmillan, 1959.
Thomas L. The long habit. N Engl J Med 1972; 286:825–6.
Webb RA (ed.) The Washington Post deskbook on style. New York: Mraw-Hill, 1978.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okie, S. (1984). Writing for Communication with the Public. In: Taylor, R.B., Munning, K.A. (eds) Written Communication in Family Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5248-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5248-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90979-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5248-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive