Abstract
The multivariate nature of architectural psychology makes it an appropriate field for the application of facet theory and its associated analysis methods. The area of postoccupancy user evaluations of buildings (henceforth called “evaluations”) has, over the last 4 years, derived considerable benefit from the application of facet theory. In this chapter the development of a “general mapping sentence for purposive evaluation of places” (Canter, 1983) will be considered. The model has been applied in a number of settings and has revealed a consistent empirical structure for evaluations. The model has not yet reached a terminal state of research and development; however, by using the facet approach it is possible to address some remaining problems and ambiguities. Here we will consider the model as applied to three settings: hospital wards (Kenny & Canter, 1981; Canter & Kenny, 1982); housing (Canter & Rees, 1982); and an as-yet-unpublished study of offices (Donald, 1983). As the application of facet theory to evaluation has proved to be fruitful in advancing the field of evaluation in ways in which previous “conventional” approaches have failed, it is worth considering the major criticisms of the field so as to reveal how facet theory has proved to be beneficial.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allport, G. W. (1955).Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven: Yale University.
American Society of Landscape Architects. (February, 1974). Priorities for ASLA.ASLA Bulletin.
Argyle, M., Furnham, A., & Graham, J. A. (1981).Social situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Armistead, N. (Ed.). (1974).Restructuring social psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Backman, C. W. (1979). Epilogue: A New Paradigm? In G. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), Emerging strategies in social psychological research.New York: Wiley.
Becker, F. D. (1981).Workspace: Creating environments in organisations. New York: Praeger.
Bruner, J. (1976).Psychological theories and the image of man. Herbert Spencer Lectures, University of Oxford.
Building Performance Research Unit. (1972).Building performance. London: Applied Science.
Canter, D. (1977).The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.
Canter, D. (1983). The purposive evaluation of places: A facet approach.Environment & Behavior, 75, (6), 659 – 698.
Canter, D. (1984). Putting situations in their place. In A. Furnham (Ed.),Social behaviour in context. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Canter, D. & Kenny, C. (1978).U.S.E.P.l. The need for systematic user evaluation in health buildings and the development of the user survey evaluation package. Hospital Evaluation Research Unit, University of Surrey.
Canter, D., & Kenny, C. (1981). The multivariate structure of design evaluation: A cylindrex of nurses’conceptualisations.Multivariate Behavioural Research,16, 215 – 235.
Canter, D., & Kenny, C. (1982). Approaches to environmental evaluation.International Review of Applied Psychology,31, 145 – 151.
Canter, D., & Rees, C. (1982). A multivariate model of housing satisfaction.International Review of Applied Psychology,31, 185 – 208.
Craik, K. H., & Zube, E. (Eds.). (1976).Perceiving environmental quality: Research and applications. London: Plenum.
Donald, I. J. (1983).The multivariate structure of office evaluation. Unpublished Master’s dissertation, University of Surrey.
Duffy, F. (1974). Office design and organizations: 2. The testing of a hypothetical model.Environment and Planning B, 7, 217 – 235.
Feyerabend, P. (1978).Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: Verso.
Forgras, J. P. (1979). Multidimensional scaling: A discovery method in social psychology. In: G. P. Ginsburg (Ed.),Emerging strategies in social psychological research. New York: Wiley.
Friedman, A., Zimring, C., & Zube, E. (Eds.) (1978).Environmental design evaluation. New York: Plenum.
Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,26, 309 – 326.
Ginsburg, G. P. (1979). Introduction and overview. In G. P. Ginsburg(Ed.), Emerging strategies in social psychological research. New York: Wiley.
Girogi, A. (1970). Toward phenomenologically based research in psychology.Journal of Phenomenological Psychology,1, 75 – 98.
Gould, C. C. (1983). Beyond causality in the social sciences: Reciprocity as a model of non-exploitative social relations. In R. S. Cohen & M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.),Epistemology, methodology, and the social sciences. Boston: Reidel.
Guttman, L. (1977). What is not what in theory construction. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Meeting of the Israel Sociological Association, Feb. 14–15, Haifa.
Harre, R, & Secord, P. F. (1972).The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.
Israel, J., & Tajfel, M. (Eds.). (1972).The context of social psychology: A critical assessment. London: Academic.
Kelly, G. A. (1955).The psychology of personal constructs, 1. New York: Norton.
Kenny, C. (1983).A multivariate model of hospital ward evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey.
Kenny, C., & Canter, D. (1981). A facet structure for nurses’ evaluations of ward designs.Journal of Occupational Psychology,54, 93 – 108.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edition). Chicago: Chicago University.
Levine, M. (1974). Scientific method and the adversary model.American Psychologist,29, 661 – 677.
Levy, S. (1981). Lawful roles of facets in social theories. In I. Borg (Ed.),Multidimensional data representations: When and why. Ann Arbor: Mathesis.
Levy-Leboyer, C. (1978).Etude psychologique due cadre de vie. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Reserche Scientiflque.
Lingoes, J. (Ed.). (1978).Geometric representations of relational data. Ann Arbor: Mathesis.
McGuire, W. S. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,26, 446 – 456.
Marans, R. W., & Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1982). Evaluating open and conventional office design.Environment & Behaviour,14, 333 – 351.
Peterson, G. (1976). Perceived quality of scienic and recreational envornments research needs and priorities, In K. Craik & E. Zube (Eds.), Perceiving environmental quality: Research and applications. London: Plenum.
Pile, J. (1976).Interiors 3rd Book of Offices. New York: Watson-Guptill.
Porter, L., Lawler, E., & Hackman, J. R. (1975).Behavior in Organisations. California: McGraw-Hill.
Rapoport, A. (1977).Human aspects of urban form. Oxford: Pergamon.
Russell, J. A., & Ward, L. M. (1982). Environmental psychology.Annual Review of Psychology,33, 651 – 688.
Schein, E. H. (1980).Organisational psychology (3rd edition). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Sharma, R. A. (1982).Organisational theory and behaviour. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
Shepard, R. N. (1974). Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects.Psychometrika,39, 373 – 421.
Shye, S. (1978). On the search for laws in the behavioral sciences. In S. Shye (Ed.),Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioural sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Simon, H. A. (1969).The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MIT Press.
Stokols, D. (1978) Environmental psychology.Annual Review of Psychology,29, 253 – 295.
Wicker, A. W. (1979).An introduction to ecological psychology. Monterey: Brooks/ Cole.
Wineman, J. D. (1982). Office design and evaluation: An overview.Environment & Behavior,14, 271 – 298.
Wohlwill, J. F. (1976). Environmental aesthetics: The environment as a source of affect. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.),Human Behavior. Theory and Research I. New York: Plenum.
Zimring, C., & Reizenstein, S. (1980). Post occupancy evaluation: An overview.Environment & Behavior,12, 429 – 450.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donald, I. (1985). The Cylindrex of Place Evaluation. In: Canter, D. (eds) Facet Theory. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5042-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5042-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9537-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5042-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive