Summary
One source of (dis)unity in psychology is often ignored, namely differences among psychologists in the way they relate theories and data to the world. Personal differences between interpretation styles contribute to disunity and discontinuity within psychology. The same data as well as the same concepts and theories may be interpreted in different ways, thereby adding fuel to misunderstanding, apparent ‘incommensurability’, etc. In this paper two opposite styles of interpretation are introduced. The works of Hermann von Helmholtz and Ernst Mach serve as examples. The paper concludes by noting the consequences of different interpretation styles in contemporary psychology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blackmore, J. T. (1972). Ernst Mach. His work, life, and influence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blackmore, J. T. (1983). Philosophy as part of internal history of science. Philosophy of Social Sciences, 13, 17–45.
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of ‘Verbal behavior’ (1957). Language, 35, 26–58.
Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind. London: Macmillan.
Fodor, J. A. (1986). Information and association. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 27. (pages not numbered).
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). How direct is visual perception? Cognition, 9, 139–196.
Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
Gholson, B., & Barker, P. (1985). Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan. Applications in the history of physics and psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 755–769.
Goldstein, E. B. (1984). Sensation and perception (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
Hamilton, W. (1852). Of presentative and representative knowledge. In W. Hamilton (Ed.), The works of Thomas Reid. (pp 804–815). Edinburgh: Blackwood
Helmholtz, H. von (1865/1871/1876). Populäre wissenschafliche Vorträge (Popular Scientific Lectures, 3 Vols.) Braunschweig: Vieweg.
Helmholtz, H. von (1962). Treatise on physiological optics. In J. Southall (Ed.), Helmholtz’ Treatise on physiological optics. (2 vols.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1856, 1860, 1867).
Hezewijk, R. van (1987). Modularity, mental models, and tertiary qualities. In Wm J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, H. van Rappard, A. W. Staats (Eds.), Current issues in theoretical psychology. (pp 115–133). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Koenigsberger, L. (1902/1903/1903). Hermann von Helmholtz. (3 vols.). Braunschweig: Vieweg.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Mach, E. (1865). On the effect of the spatial distribution of the light stimulus. In F. Ratliff (Ed.), (1965), Mach bands. (pp 253–271). San Francisco: Holden Day.
Mach, E. (1868). On the dependence of retinal points on one another. In F. Ratliff (Ed.), Mach bands. (pp 307–320). San Francisco: Holden Day.
Mach, E. (1959). The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical. (C. M. Williams, Transi.). New York: Dover. (Original work 1st ed. 1885 as Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen).
Mach, E. (1976). Knowledge and error. (B. McGuinness, Transl.). Dordrecht: Reidel. (Original work published 1905 as Erkenntnis und Irrtum).
Meijering, Th. C. (1981). Naturalistic epistemology. Helmholtz and the rise of a cognitive theory of perception (2 vols.). (Ph.D. thesis, University of California)
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Popper, K. R. (1983). Realism and the aim of science. London: Hutchinson.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: analog media versus tacit knowledge. In N. Block (Ed.), Imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quine, W. V. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In W. V. Quine (Ed.), From a logical point of view. (pp 20–36). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ratliff, F. (1965). Mach bands. Quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina. San Francisco: Holden Day.
Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation. Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417–447.
Shepard, R. N., & L. A. Cooper (Eds.). (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1985). Cognitive science and behaviorism. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 291–301.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Staats, A. W. (1983). Psychology’s crisis of disunity. New York: Praeger.
Vroon, P. A. (1987). Man-machine analogs and theoretical mainstreams in psychology. In Wm J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, H. van Rappard, & A. W. Staats (Eds.), Current issues in theoretical psychology. (pp. 393–415). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Warren, R. M., & Warren, R. P. (1968). Helmholtz on perception. Its physiology and development. London: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
van Hezewijk, R. (1988). Interpretation Styles of Psychologists and Their Consequences for Psychology. In: Baker, W.J., Mos, L.P., Rappard, H.V., Stam, H.J. (eds) Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3902-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3902-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96757-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3902-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive