Abstract
There are three sources for response effects in surveys: the survey task (mode of administration), the interviewer, and the respondent. Although most research has focused on response differences due to characteristics of the interviewer, and the respondent, research suggests that differences in the mode of administration are the major source of response effects (Bradburn, 1983). However, relatively little is known about the conditions under which response differences can be expected. The literature is mixed with respect to the extent of response differences between mail and telephone survey methods. The general consensus among survey researchers has been that mode of administration has only a modest effect on most survey responses (Singer & Presser, 1989, p. 187), although this view may be changing (Schwarz, Strack, Hippler, & Bishop, in press). Our purpose in this chapter is to present data testing whether some response differences between telephone and mail surveys are attributable to differences in the effect of the context established by the mode of administration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tarnai, J., Dillman, D.A. (1992). Questionnaire Context as a Source of Response Differences in Mail and Telephone Surveys. In: Schwarz, N., Sudman, S. (eds) Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7695-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2848-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive