Skip to main content

Bidirectional Effects of Imitation and Repetition in Conversation: A Synthesis Within a Cognitive Model

  • Chapter
The Many Faces of Imitation in Language Learning

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Language and Communication ((SSLAN,volume 24))

Abstract

Despite a colorful and controversial history, imitation has been prematurely rejected as an explanatory mechanism in language acquisition. During the 1950s, behaviorists asserted that simple or exact imitation was the primary means of language learning (e.g., Skinner, 1957). Critics later argued that imitation could not logically account for the rich, generative language behavior of children (see Chomsky, 1959, 1979, 1980). For example, Brown and Bellugi (1964) argued that, because children’s overregularizations (taked, swimmed) were not and could not be imitative in nature, then neither could other acquisition phenomena be imitative. What seemed particularly damaging was the observation that children’s imitative speech was no more sophisticated than their spontaneous utterances (Ervin, 1964 Slobin, 1967). What followed in the 1970s was a bifurcation of the field; researchers with more applied interests continued to work in imitation, while a few mainstream developmental psycholinguists relegated imitation to debates over appropriate definitions (e.g., McTear, 1978; Moerk, 1977; Snow, 1979, 198lb; Whitehurst & Vasta, 1975). Unfortunately, this division has widened the conceptual distance between current theory and applications such that modern thinkers (e.g., Pinker, 1984; Wexler & Cullicover, 1980) virtually ignore imitation data from clinical or applied sources. In fact, neither Pinker’s (1984) nor Wexler and Cullicover’s (1980) books on language learnability theory mention the term imitation at all, nor do they cite data on imitation or other phenomena reported in the applied journals of the American Speech and Hearing Association. Not surprisingly, clinicians may well despair of using modern theories in practice, as they appear to be too abstract for application or simply irrelevant for clinical populations. Thus, each “camp” proceeds for the most part, independently, focusing on different facets of the problem of language acquisition, with neither trying to account for the other’s data. The aim of this chapter is to bridge this crevasse and reintegrate imitation into explanatory models of language acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N., & Nelson, K. (1984). Recasting and related conversational techniques for triggering syntactic advances by young children. First Language, 5, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., Beeghly-Smith, M., Bretherton, I., & McNew, S. (1982). Social basis of language development: A reassessment. In H. Reese & L. Lipsett (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 8–75). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173–218). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. (1974). Talking, understanding and thinking. In R. Schiefelbusch & R. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspective: Acquisition,retardation, and intervention (pp. 285–312). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L., Hood, R, & Lightbown, P. (1974). Imitation in language development: If when and why? Cognitive Psychology, 6, 380–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L., Rocissano, L., & Hood, L. (1976). Adult-child discourse: Developmental interaction between information processing and linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 521–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K. (in press). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J. (1975). The relationship between syntax discrimination and sentence imitation in children. Child Development, 46, 444–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J. (1976). Normal and scrambled grammar in discrimination, imitation, and comprehension. Child Development, 47, 669–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1984). Do children say as they are told? A new perspective on motherese. In Feagans, L., Garvey, C., & Gol inkoff, R. (Eds.), The origins and growth of communication (pp. 176–195). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J., & Marquis, A.L. (1977). Children’s control of adult speech. Child Development, 48, 1002–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J., & Stanowicz, L. (1988). Adult response to children’s language errors: The issue of negative evidence. Developmental Psychology, 24, 684–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J., Stanowicz, L., Ness, J., & Warren-Leubecker, A. (1986, April). Errors in sentence production: Evidence from a limited information processor. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Development, Nashville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J., Stine, E.L., & Ritzenberg, D. (1982). Motherese: The effects of feedback and experience. The Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J., & Warren-Leubecker, A. (1985). Theoretical approaches to language acquisition. In J.B. Gleason (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 173–226). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J., & Warren-Leubecker, A. (1988). Recent developments in child directed speech: You’ve come a long way, baby-talk. Language Science 10(1), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvillian, J., Nelson, K.E., & Charrow, V. (1976). Languages and language-related skills in deaf and hearing children. Sign Language Studies, 12, 211–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braine, M. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Language, 39, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Bellugi, U. (1964). Three processes in the child’s acquisition of syntax. Harvard Education Review, 34, 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and the order of acquisition in child speech. In J.R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 454–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T., & Evans, M. (1984). The ontogeny of description. In L. Feagans, C. Garvey, & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), The origins and growth of communication (pp. 297–316). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W. (1977). Creativity in verbalizations and its implications for the nature of stored knowledge. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (Vol. 1). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, K., Leonard, L., & Mervis, C. (1986). The effects of feedback on young children’s inappropriate word usage. Journal of Child Languages, 13, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R., & Miller, J. (1975). Word order in early two and three word utterances: Does production precede comprehension? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Verbal Behavior by B.F. Skinner. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1979). Human language and other semiotic systems. Semiotica, 25, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980). On binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1977). What’s the use of imitation? Journal of Child Language, 4, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., Hutcheson, S., & Van Buren, R. (1974). Comprehension and production in language acquisition. Journal of Linguistics, 10, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, T.G. (1977). Mother’s speech adjustments: Contributions of selected child listener variables. In C. Snow & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 151–188). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetras, M., Post, K., & Snow, C. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13, 275–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B., & Coleman, L. (1986). Talking to children, foreigners, and retarded adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 945–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, J. (1980). The processing of rule learning in child speech: A new look. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s Language (Vol. 2, pp. 1–44). New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, P., & de Villiers, J. (1972). Early judgements of semantic and syntactic acceptability by children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, S. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children’s language. In E. Lenneberg (Ed.), New directions in the study of language (pp. 163–189). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin Tripp, S. (1971). An overview of theories of grammatical development. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, M. (1987, April). Adult recasts as conditions for imitation in children. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, C. (1972). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 606–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. (1973). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. In C. Ferguson & D. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 465–485). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, C. (1977). The contingent query: A dependent act in conversation. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.), Interaction, conversation, and the development of language. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, C. (1978). Contingent queries and their relations in discourse. In E.O. Keenan (Ed.), Studies in linguistic pragmatics. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, B., & Tomasello, M. (1984). The effect of variation in sentence length on young children’s attention and comprehension. First Language, 5, 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L., & Landau, B. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L., Newport, E., & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of the motherese hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 11, 43–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L., & Wanner, E. (1984). Current issues in language learning. In M. Bornstein & M. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, S., & Stone, G. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning, and resonance. Psychological Review, 93, 46–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, H., & Crain, S. (1984). Acquisition of cognitive compiling. Cognition, 17, 85–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Hassemer, W. (1972). Some factors affecting the complexity of children’s sentences: The effects of modeling, age, sex, and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh-Pasek, K., Treiman, R., & Schneiderman, M. (1984). Brown and Hanlon revisited: Mother’s sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language, 11, 81–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff-Ginsburg, E., & Shatz, M. (1982). Linguistic input and the child’s acquisition of language. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. (1977). Making it last: repetition in children’s discourse. In S. Ervin Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child discourse (pp. 125–138). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, T., & Wolfe, J. (1972). The acquisition of agreement in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 698–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, H. (1984). Topic as a starting point for syntax. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 49(Serial No. 5).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, L., Chapman, K., Rowan, L., & Weiss, A. (1983). Three hypotheses concerning young children’s imitation of lexical items. Developmental Psychology, 19, 591–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, K., & Dixon, E. (1967). The growth of the control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model of language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maratsos, M., & Chalkey, M. (1980). The internal language of children’s syntax: The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In K.E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language (Vol. 2, pp. 127–214). New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J., & Valian, V. (1977, October). When do children imitate? When imitate? When necessary. Paper presented at the annual Boston University Conference on Language Acquisition, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: An account of the basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J., Yerchuk, C., & Holdgrafer, G. (1986). Comprehension and production of word order by two year old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDade, H., Simpson, M., & Lamb, D. (1982). The use of elicited imitation as a measure of expressive grammar: A question of validity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 19–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McTear, M.F. (1978). Repetition in child language: Imitation or creation. In R. Campbell & P. Smith (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language (pp. 293–312). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., & Schwaneveldt, R. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Psychological Review, 90, 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. (1975). Verbal interactions between children and their mothers during the preschool years. Developmental Psychology, 11, 788–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. (1977). Processes and products of imitation: Additional evidence that imitation is progressive. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6, 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. (1983). The mother of Eve as a first language teacher. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. (1985). A differential interactive analysis of language teaching and learning. Discourse Processes, 8, 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, M., & Crain, S. (1985, October). Performance factors in children’s spontaneous sentence production. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(Serial No. 1–2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E. (1977). Facilitating children’s syntax acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 13, 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E. (1981). Toward a rare-event cognitive comparison theory of syntax acquisition. In R. Dale & D. Ingram (Eds.), Child language: An international perspective. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E. (1987). Some observations from the perspective of the rare event cognitive comparison theory of language acquisition. In K.E. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (Eds.), Children’s Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E. (1988). Strategies for first language teaching. In R. Schiefelbusch & M. Rice (Eds.), Teachability of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E., Denninger, M., Bonvillian, J., Kaplan, B., & Baker, N. (1983). Maternal input adjustments and non-adjustments as related to children’s linguistic advances and the language acquisition theories. In A. Pelligrini & T. Yawkey (Eds.), The development of oral and written languages: Readings in developmental and applied linguistics. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, E., Gleitman, L., & Gleitman, H. (1977). Mother I’d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of motherese. In C. Snow & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, P. (Ed.), (1978). Memory development in children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C., Cosgrove, J., & O’Brien, R. (1980). Nonverbal indicants of comprehension and noncomprehension in children. Developmental Psychology, 16, 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, S. (1987). Parental responses to grammatical and ungrammatical child utterances. Child Development, 58, 376–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7, 217–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1987). The bootstrapping problem in language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 399–442). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodd, L., & Braine, M. (1970). Children’s imitations of syntactic construction as a measure of linguistic competence. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. (1975). Within word structure in the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 392–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruder, K., Hermann, P., & Schiefelbusch, R. (1977). Effects of verbal imitation and comprehension training on verbal production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (1973). Interpretation and imitation in early language development. In R. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Constraints on learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., & Johnson, M. (1972, July). Language development in a hearing child of deaf parents. Paper presented at the International Symposium on First Language Acquisition, Florence, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, E., Smith, C., & Gleitman, L. (1969). A study of the acquisition of language: Free responses to commands. Language, 8, 322–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D.I. (1967). Imitation and grammatical development in children. In N. Endler, S. Boulter, & H. Osser (Eds.), Contemporary issues in developmental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E. (1972). Mothers’ speech to language learning children. Child Development, 43,549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E. (1979). The role of social interaction in language acquisition. In A. Collins (Ed.), Children’s language and communication: 12th Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E. (1981a). Social interaction and language acquisition. In P. Dale and D. Ingram (Eds.), Child language: An international perspective. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E. (1981b). The uses of imitation. Journal of Child Language, 8, 205–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E., & Ferguson, C.A. (Eds.), (1977). Talking to children: Language input and acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stine, E.L., & Bohannon, J. (1983). Imitations, interactions and language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 10, 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1988). The role of joint attentional processes in early language development. Language Sciences, 7, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallan, V. (1986, October). A problem about positive and negative evidence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Leubecker, A., & Bohannon, J. (1982). The effects of expectation and feedback on speech to foreigners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Leubecker, A., & Bohannon, J. (1983). The effects of verbal feedback and listener type on the speech of preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 540–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Leubecker, A., & Bohannon, J. (1984). Intonation patterns in child-directed speech: Mother-father differences. Child Development, 55, 1541–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Leubecker, A., & Bohannon, J. (1985). Language in society: Variation and adaptation. In J. Berko-Gleason (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 331–367). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Leubecker, A., & Tate, C. (1986, October). Is preschoolers’ speech egocentric? Evidence of pragmatic errors and routines in telephone conversations. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K. (1982). A principle theory for language acquisition. In E. Wanner & L. Gleit-man (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 288–318). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K., & Cullicover, P. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. (1977). Imitation, response novelty, and language acquisition. In B.C. Etzel, J.M. LeBlanc, & D.M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method and application. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G., Ironsmith, M., & Goldfein, M. (1974). Selective imitation of the passive construction through modeling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 17, 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G., & Vasta, R. (1975). Is language acquired through imitation? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bohannon, J.N., Stanowicz, L. (1989). Bidirectional Effects of Imitation and Repetition in Conversation: A Synthesis Within a Cognitive Model. In: Speidel, G.E., Nelson, K.E. (eds) The Many Faces of Imitation in Language Learning. Springer Series in Language and Communication, vol 24. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1011-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1011-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6983-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1011-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics