Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Is Who Violating? A Reconsideration of Linguistic Violations in Light of Event-Related Brain Potentials

  • Chapter
Cognitive Electrophysiology

Abstract

It is often a worthwhile exercise to step back from one’s field of endeavor and to think in broad terms about what its proper goals are, or perhaps what they should be. It seems to us that the proper goals of event-related brain potential (ERP) research into language comprehension should at minimum include enquiries into the following questions:

  1. 1.

    How many independent factors contribute to our understanding of natural language?

  2. 2.

    What function relates all these factors to comprehension?

  3. 3.

    Are these factors specific to language, or do they cut across cognitive domains?

  4. 4.

    Which consequences of these factors can be consciously modified (e.g., stopped or gated), and which are not under conscious control?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ardal S, Donald MW, Meuter R, Muldrew S, Luce M (1990): Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals. Brain Lang 39:187–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin S, Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1993): Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. Psychophysiology 30(2): 161–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Besson M, Macar F (1987): An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. Psychophysiology 24:14–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Besson M, Kutas M, Van Petten C (1992): An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effects in sentences. J Cognit Neurosci 4(2): 132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter PA, Just MA (1992): A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychol Rev 99(1): 122–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1973): Conditions on transformations. In: A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Anderson S, Kiparsky P, eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1977): On wh-movement. In: Formal Syntax, Culicover P, Akmajian A, Wasow T, eds. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1981): Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1986a): Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1986b): Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly JF, Stewart SH, Phillips NA (1990): The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences. Brain Lang 39:302–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischler I (1990): Comprehending language with event-related potentials. In: Event-Related Brain Potentials: Issues and Applications, Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson RE, Jr., eds. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor JA (1983): The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor JD (1978): Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguist Inquiry 9:427–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster KI (1981): Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Q J Exp Psychol 33A:465–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey SM, Tanenhaus MK, Chapman RM (1989): Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. J Psycholinguist Res 18:51–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett M (1978): Word and sentence perception. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology 8, Perception, Held R, Leibowitz HW, Teuber HL, eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D (1981): Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognit Brain Theory 4:161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter TC, Jackson JL, Mulder G (1992): An electrophysiological study of semantic processing in young and middle aged academics. Psychophysiology 29(1): 38–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halgren E (1990): Insights from evoked potentials into the neuropsychological mechanisms of reading. In: Neurobiology of Higher Cognitive Function, Scheibel AB, Wechsler AF, eds. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger M J, Friedman D (1989): Age-related changes in semantic activation: Evidence from event-related potentials. Proc EPIC IX, Noordwijk, The Netherlands III:38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbin TJ, Marsh GR, Harvey MT (1984): Differences in the late components of the event-related potential due to age and to semantic and nonsemantic tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 59:489–496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herning RI, Jones RT, Hunt JS (1987): Speech event-related potentials reflect linguistic content and processing level. Brain Lang 30:116–129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb PJ (1986): ERP correlates of semantic facilitation. In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement 38, Cerebral Psychophysiology: Studies in Event-Related Potentials, McCallum WC, Zappoli R, Denoth F, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb PJ, Neville HJ (1990): Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision—a comparison using event-related brain potentials. Lang Cognit Processes 5:281–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CTJ (1982): Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King J, Just MA (1991): Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. J Mem Lang 30:580–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J, Just MA: Individual differences in working memory and the use of contextual information during parsing (in manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluender R (1991): Cognitive Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluender R (1992): Deriving island constraints from principles of predication. In: Island Constraints: Theory, Acquisition, and Processing. Goodluck H, Rochemont M, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluender R, Kutas M (1993): Bridging the gap—Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. J Cognit Neurosci 5:196–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama S, Nageishi Y, Shimokochi M, Hokama M, Miyazato Y, Miyatani M, Ogura C (1991): The N400 component of event-related potentials in schizophrenic patients: A preliminary study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78:124–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M (1987): Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited during rapid serial visual presentation of congruous and incongruous sentences. In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement 40, Current Trends in Event-Related Brain Potential Research, Johnson R, Jr., Parasuraman R, Rohrbaugh JW, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1980): Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207:203–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1983): Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Mem Cognit 11:539–550.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1984): Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature (London): 307:161–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Van Petten C (1988): Event-related brain potential studies of language. In: Advances in Psychophysiology 3, Ackles PK, Jennings JR, Coles MGH, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Van Petten C (1990): Electrophysiological perspectives on comprehending written language. In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement 41, New Trends and Advanced Techniques in Clinical Neurophysiology, Rossini PM, Mauguiere F, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Lindamood T, Hillyard SA (1984): Word expectancy and event-related brain potentials during sentence processing. In: Preparatory States and Processes, Kornblum S, Requin J, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Mitchiner M, Iragui V (1992) (in manuscript): Effects of aging on the N400 component of the ERP in a semantic categorization task. Psychophysiology 29:547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Neville HJ, Holcomb PJ (1987): A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening, and signing. In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement 39, The London Symposia, Ellingson RJ, Murray NMF, Halliday AM, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Van Petten C, Besson M (1988): Event-related potential asymmetries during the reading of sentences. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69:218–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Bates E, Kluender R, Van Petten C, Clark V, Blesch F: What’s critical about the critical period? Effects of early experience in the language processing of bilinguals (in manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson WD (1987): Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25:71–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson WD, Tyler LK (1980): The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8:1–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson WD, Tyler LK (1987): Against modularity. In: Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding, Garfield JL, ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum WC, Farmer SF, Pocock PK (1984): The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 59:477–488.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neville H J (1985): Biological constraints on semantic processing: A comparison of spoken and signed language (abstract). Psychophysiology 22:576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville HJ, Nicol JL, Barss A, Forster KI, Garrett MF (1991): Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Cognit Neurosci 3:151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigam A, Hoffman JE, Simons RF (1992): N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words. J Cognit Neurosci 4:15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre AC, McCarthy G (1987): Visual selective attention to meaningful text. An analysis of event-related potentials. Soc Neurosci Abstr 13:852.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran JP, Isenhart R, Sandman CA, Larkey LS (1988): Brain responses to semantic anomaly in natural, continuous speech. Int J Psychophysiol 6:243–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout L (1990): Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited During Sentence Comprehension. Doctoral Dissertation, Tufts University, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten LJ, Rugg MD, Doyle MC: Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: The role of selective attention (in manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugg MD (1990): Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Mem Cognit 18:367–379.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler LK, Marslen-Wilson WD (1977): The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 16:645–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler LK, Wessels J (1983): Quantifying contextual contributions to word recognition processes. Percept Psychophys 34:409–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten C (1989): Context Effects in Word Recognition: Studies with Event-Related Brain Potentials. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten C, Kutas M (1987): Ambiguous words in context: and event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning course of meaning activation. J Mem Lang 26:188–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten C, Kutas M (1991a): Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Mem Cognit 18:380–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten C, Kutas M (1991b): Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open and closed class words. Mem Cognit 19:95–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten C, Kutas M (1991c): Electrophysiological evidence for the flexibility of lexical processing. In: Word and Sentence, Simpson G, ed. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten C, Kutas M, Kluender R, Mitchiner M, McIssac H (1991): Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials. J Cognit Neurosci 3:131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Marta Kutas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Kluender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Neurologische Klinik, Konstanty-Gutschow-Straße 8, D-3000, Hannover 61, Germany

    H.-J. Heinze

  2. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Neurologische Klinik, D-3000, Hannover 61, Germany

    T. F. Münte

  3. Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA

    George R. Mangun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kutas, M., Kluender, R. (1994). What Is Who Violating? A Reconsideration of Linguistic Violations in Light of Event-Related Brain Potentials. In: Heinze, HJ., Münte, T.F., Mangun, G.R. (eds) Cognitive Electrophysiology. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0283-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0283-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6693-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0283-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation