Skip to main content

Harmonising Data in Official Statistics

Development, Procedures, and Data Quality

  • Chapter
Advances in Cross-National Comparison

Abstract

Statisticians understand the term ‘harmonisation’ to mean the creation of a desired degree of comparability between statistics of different countries. Comparability is a quality criterion, meaning that it is one of many product properties striven for in drawing up statistics. Comparability may refer both to comparing statistics at different times, as well as to spatial comparison between sets of statistics across a number of regions, nations, etc.

This article is based on results of CHINTEX research project: “The change from input harmonisation to ex-post harmonisation in national samples of the European Community Household Panel — implications of data quality” (CHINTEX) is a shared-cost research project funded by the European Commission’s Fifth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. Information on the project can be found on the web page : http ://www.destatis.de/chintex/index.htm. I wish to thank Dr. Stefan Linz for his helpful contribution to an earlier draft of this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arondel, P., and R. Depoutot. 1998. International Comparability and Quality of Statistics. Eurostat Working Paper 9:A/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, H., and G. Fürst. 1966. “Über die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des internationalen Vergleichs von Wirtschaftsstatistiken.” Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 50:138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtold, S. et al. 1998. “Konvertierung von Daten des Sozioökonomischen Panels für das Europäische Haushaltspanel.” Wirtschaft und Statistik 1998/11:882–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtold, S. and K. Blanke. 1993. “Piloterhebung zum EG-Haushaltspanel.” Wirtschaft und Statistik 1993/5:326–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkmann, A. 1982. “Schwerpunkte der Zusammenarbeit des Statistischen Bundesamtes mit internationalen Organisationen 1976 to 1981.” Wirtschaft und Statistik 1982/4:259–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgin, G. and W. Moore. 1994. “Leitlinien und Koordinierung der supra-and internationalen Statistik.” Pp. 25–44 in Statistik 2000 — Zukunftsaufgaben der Amtlichen Statistik, edited by H.G. Merk, G. Bürgin et al. Stuttgart: Metzler and Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defays, D. 1995. Is Harmonisation Possible? Paper presented at the Conference on Methodological issues in Official Statistics, Stockholm 12-13 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depoutot, R. 2001. Modelling of Comparability and Coherence of International Statistics. Paper presented at the international Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Stockholm 14-15 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. 1999. “Measurement and its Uses: Harmonization and Quality in Social Statistics.” Pp. 115–126 in The future of European social statistics, Harmonisation of social statistics and quality, The fourth Mondorf Seminar 26 and 27 March 1998, edited by Eurostat. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehling, M. 1996. “Historische Statistik — Probleme und Perspektiven der internationalen Zusammenarbeit.” Wirtschaft und Statistik 1996/7:413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichmann, W. 1985. “Bruttoinlandsprodukt im internationalen Vergleich.” Wirtschaft und Statistik 1985/7:519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (Ed.). 1999. The future of European social statistics, Harmonisation of social statistics and quality, The fourth Mondorf Seminar 26 and 27 March 1998. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grais, B. 1999. “Statistical harmonisation and quality: The case of social statistics” Pp. 51–114 in The future of European social statistics, Harmonisation of social statistics and quality, The fourth Mondorf Seminar 26 and 27 March 1998, edited by Eurostat. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, G. et al. 1977. “Revision der Volkswirtschaftlichen Gesamtrechnungen 1960 bis 1976.” Wirtschaft und Statistik 1977/4:215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, G. 1953. “Die statistische Arbeit the Vereinten Nationen.” Wirtschaft und Statistik 1953/5:191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merk, G. 1994. “Wie kann ein Statistisches Amt in Zeiten haushaltsmä ßiger Restriktionen die Anforderungen Eurostats erfüllen?” Wirtschaft und Statistik 1994/5:323–328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ehling, M. (2003). Harmonising Data in Official Statistics. In: Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P., Wolf, C. (eds) Advances in Cross-National Comparison. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4828-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9186-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics