Skip to main content

The Need to Integrate Theory, Research, and Application Efforts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Families with Adolescents

Part of the book series: Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development ((ARAD))

  • 7814 Accesses

Abstract

The knowledge base created about families with adolescents over the past 15 years has been organized in the present book as three separate parts according to work done on theory, research, and application topics, respectively. At the same time, the natural overlap of these theoretical, empirical, and application literatures was discussed wherever possible. The present chapter makes the case for more systematic attempts to highlight the interconnectedness of these oft-separated scholarly works. Harkening back over 3 decades ago in the family literature, David Olson’s “triple threat” model for bridging theory, research, and application efforts is brought forward for consideration by scholars who think about, observe, and work with families with adolescents. This chapter begins by briefly reviewing some of the key points made in this earlier work, and is followed by a discussion of some of the key factors that have served as barriers to the unification of these academic activities. This is followed by some concluding thoughts as to why the “triple threat” model is both applicable and advantageous to those scholars who study families with adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Crane, D. R., Wampler, K. S., Sprenkle, D. H., Sandberg, J. G., & Hovestadt, A. J. (2002). The scientist-practitioner model in marriage and family therapy programs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 75–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demo, D. H. (2008). From the editor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, D. R., & Gonzalez, C. (2005). Publication patterns of faculty in commission on accreditation for marriage and family therapy education programs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 89–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karem, E. A., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2010). The research-informed clinician: A guide to training the next-generation MFT. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36, 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavee, Y., & Dollahite, D. C. (1991). The linkage between theory and research in family science. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. E., & Nichols, W. C. (2010). The doctoral education of professional marriage and family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36, 259–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. L. (1998). Using the US land-grant system as a model to attack this nation’s crime problem. The Criminologist, 23, 1–4. Accessed July 12, 2010, from http://www.asc41.com/March-April%201998.htm

  • McWey, L. M., West, S. H., Ruble, N., Handy, A. K., Handy, D. G., Koshy, M., et al. (2002). The practice of clinical research in accredited marriage and family therapy programs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. L. (1976). Bridging research, theory, and application: The triple threat in science. In D. H. L. Olson (Ed.), Treating relationships (pp. 565–579). Lake Mills, IA: Graphic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W. M., & Wynne, L. C. (2000). Toward progress research: Closing the gap between family therapy practice and research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. G., Johnson, L. N., Robila, M., & Miller, R. B. (2002). Clinician identified barriers to clinical research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 61–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmied, V., & Walsh, P. (2010a). Effective casework practice with adolescents: perspectives of statutory child protection practitioners. Child and Family Social Work, 15, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmied, V., & Walsh, P. (2010b). Effective casework practice with adolescents. Perspectives of statutory child protection practitioners. Child and Family Social Work, 15, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H. (1976). In my opinion: The need for integration among theory, research, and practice in the family field. The Family Coordinator, 25, 261–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk, R. J. (1989). The need for integration among theory, research, and application in family science: An update. Family Relations, 38, 220–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M. Gavazzi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gavazzi, S.M. (2011). The Need to Integrate Theory, Research, and Application Efforts. In: Families with Adolescents. Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8246-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics