Skip to main content

Learning from Other Countries: Comparing Experiences and Drawing Lessons for the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Are there any medical sociologists who believe in the notion of American “exceptionalism” and resist considering US healthcare policy in comparative perspective? Alternatively, are there any who question whether comparisons of seemingly vastly different settings can yield fruitful lessons for the US? This paper seeks to convince the dubious in the worlds of both academia and healthcare policymaking that a comparative lens best illuminates the successes and failures of American health care and the unique framework within which it operates. We have much to learn from the experiences of other countries, not only about healthcare policy but also about the political and social parameters and the norms and values that shape it and its outcomes. Moreover, despite apparent differences, there are important similarities between our struggles and those of other countries. Understanding how and why their efforts have succeeded or failed can inform a more fruitful direction for American endeavors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Saltman’s assertion ought not to be taken too far. European countries have contained costs better than the US, but they continue to be concerned about high health care expenditures and continue to search for methods of control.

  2. 2.

    Examples here will be drawn from the experiences of Canada, Britain, and Germany.

  3. 3.

    In explaining President Bush’s threatened veto of an expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, a former advisor said the President’s objections are “philosophical and ideological. [An expansion] would move the nation toward a single payer system with rationing and price controls” (Pear 2007).

  4. 4.

    In 2007 the Census Bureau revised the figure downward by two million. The data do not distinguish insured and under-insured.

  5. 5.

    Also, polls conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation find that Americans rank health care second only to Iraq as the issue they most want presidential candidates to talk about, and coverage for the uninsured ranks higher than costs as an issue they would like to see more focus on (http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/7655.pdf).

  6. 6.

    The proportion of salary that workers in the US contribute to private insurance varies from a low of about 2% to well over 7%. Note too that under the new individual mandate in Massachusetts, some previously uninsured individuals who do not qualify for state assistance will have to pay more than 7% of their income for private coverage.

  7. 7.

    It took several decades for the government to fold into the system unemployed people, students, and others who were not members of employment-based sickness funds.

  8. 8.

    Both Canada and Germany have for-profit insurers but regulations in both are much tighter than in the US.

  9. 9.

    Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) now control 80% of NHS expenditures. They contract with General Practitioners and hospitals to meet the needs of their constituents.

  10. 10.

    Most hospitals responded to the DRGs by reducing lengths of hospital stays and by various forms of cost shifting, including the development of more outpatient services and day surgeries.

  11. 11.

    Each of these three main forms of compensation also contain perverse incentives – fee for service may reward the provision of inappropriate services, capitation may reward the denial of appropriate services, and salary may undermine productivity (Robinson 2001).

  12. 12.

     The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have developed comparable measures for hospitals, home health agencies, end-stage renal dialysis centers, and Medicare Advantage Plans, which are provided by managed care organizations.

Bibliography

  • Allen D, Pilnick A (2006) The social organisation of healthcare work. Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres CG, Griffith HM (2007) Perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of priority clinical preventive services guidelines. Am J Manag Care 13(3):150–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Budrys G (2003) Unequal health: how inequality contributes to health or illness. Roman and Littlefield Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy M (2005) 2004 Presidential Address: For Public Sociology. Am J Soc 70(1):4–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DM (2004) Your money or your life. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K et al (2006) Mirror, mirror on the wall: an update on the quality of American Health Care through the patient’s lens. The Commonwealth Fund. http://www.cmwf.org/usr_doc/Davis_mirrormirror_915.pdf

  • Davis K et al (2007) Mirror, mirror on the wall: an international update on the comparative performance of American Health Care. The Commonwealth Fund. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr_doc/1027_Davis_mirror_mirror_international_update_final.pdf?section=4039

  • Gilbert N (2002) Transformation of the welfare state: the silent surrender of public responsibility. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand JL (2006) Debate: choice and competition in the British National Health Service. Eurohealth 12(1):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray BH, O’Leary J (2000) The evolving relationship between medical sociology and health policy. In: Bird CE, Conrad P, Fremont AM (eds) The handbook of medical sociology. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 258–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker JS (2004) Review article: dismantling the health care state? Political institutions, public policies and the comparative politics of health reform. Br J Polit Sci 34:693–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage J, Maynard DW (2006) Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interaction: 30 years of research. Annu Rev Sociol 32:351–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (1990) Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Laditka JN, Laditka SB (2006) Race, ethnicity, and hospitalization for six chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the US. Ethn Health 11(3):247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light DW (2000) The medical profession and organizational change: from professional dominance to countervailing power. In: Bird CE, Conrad P, Fremont AM (eds) The handbook of medical sociology. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 201–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TH (1949) Citizenship and social class. In: Marshall TH (ed) Class, citizenship, and social development. Doubleday, New York, pp 65–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattke S et al (2006) Health care quality indicators project: initial indicators report. OECD health working papers, No. 22. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon LF Jr, Hofer TP, Hayward RA (2007) Physician-level P4P –DOA? Can quality-based payment be resuscitated? Am J Manag Care 13(5):233–236

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams JM et al (2007) Use of health services by previously uninsured Medicare Beneficiaries. N Engl J Med 357(2):143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic D (2004) The rise and fall of managed care. J Health Soc Behav 45:76–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgate K, Cheng SB (2006) Pay-for-performance: the MedPAC perspective. Health Aff 25(2):413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullahy J, Roberts S, Wolfe B (2004) Health, income, and inequality. In: Kathryn Neckerman (ed) Social inequality. Russell Sage, New York, pp 523–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerk J, Reick K, Meenga L (2006) Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management. J Adv Nurs 54(2):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley AS, Pham HH, Reschovsky JD (2007) Predictors of the growing influence of clinical practice guidelines. J Gen Intern Med 22:742–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberlander J (2007) Health reform interrupted: The unraveling of the Oregon Health Plan. Health Aff 26(1):96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M (2006) The tax subsidy to employment-based health insurance and the distribution of well being. Law Contemp Probl 69:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Pear R (2007) A battle over expansion of children’s insurance. The New York Times. <http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/09/washington/09child.html?ex=1189310400&en=65b8426fe2c28fe8&ei=5070>

  • Pearson SD, Rawlins MD (2005) Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British health service. J Am Med Assoc 294(20):2618–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 94:251–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quadagno J, Street D (2006) Recent trends in US social welfare policy. Res Aging 28(3):303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranade W (ed) (1998) Markets and health care. Addison Wesley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins MD (2004) NICE work – Providing guidance to the British National Health Service. N Engl J Med 351(14):1383–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond P, Solomon J (2007) Can incentives for healthy behavior improve health and hold down Medicaid costs? Center on budget and policy priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/6-1-07health.pdf

  • Reschovsky JD, Hadley J, Landon BE (2006) Effects of compensation methods and physician group structure on physicians’ perceived incentives to alter services to patients. Health Serv Res 41(4):1200–1220

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JC (2001) Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Q 79(2):149–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman RL et al (2006) Labor characteristics and program costs of a successful diabetes disease management program. Am J Manag Care 12(5):277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie M (1996) Realignments in the welfare state: health policy in the United States, Britain, and Canada. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltman RB (2002) The Western European experience with health care reform. http://www.euro.who.int/observatory/Studies/20021223_2

  • Schoen C, Doty MM (2004) Inequities in access to medical care in five countries: Findings from the 2001 Commonwealth fund international health policy survey. Health Policy 67:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden T, Gray BM (2006) Tax subsidies for employment-related health insurance: Estimates for 2006. Health Aff 25(6):1568–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers RM et al (2006) Racial identity matters: the relationship between racial discrimination and psychological functioning in African American adolescents. J Res Adolesc 16(2):187–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR (2003) Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J (2005) Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 83(3):457–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toner R, Elder J (2007) Most support U.S. guarantee of health care. The New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9E06E7D71631F931A35750C0A9619C8B63

  • van Doorslaer E, Masseria C, Koolman X (2006) Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. Can Med Assoc J 174(2):177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Canada Wait List Project (2005) Moving forward: final report. http://www.wcwl.org/media/pdf/news/moving_forward/report.pdf.

  • Wynia MK et al (2003) Do physicians not offer useful services because of coverage restrictions? Health Affairs 22(4):190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Ruggie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruggie, M. (2011). Learning from Other Countries: Comparing Experiences and Drawing Lessons for the United States. In: Pescosolido, B., Martin, J., McLeod, J., Rogers, A. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7261-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics