Skip to main content

Metacognition in Nonhumans: Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Uncertainty Monitoring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Abstract

Is metacognition a uniquely human trait? Comparative studies suggest that the answer is no. To test metacognitive abilities in non-human animals, researchers have used a variety of methods. In the retrospective confidence judgment paradigm, animals have to provide a low or high confidence response following a first-order task. In the “search for information” behavioral paradigm, animals sometimes need to look for missing information in order to complete a task. In the uncertainty responding paradigm, animals can choose to perform trials varying difficulty, or they can choose to avoid a particular trial and move to a new one. Studies of metacognition in non-humans based on these paradigms show that animals can evaluate their meta-perceptual uncertainty. However, several methodological and theoretical objections have been raised against the possibility for non-speaking animals to be attributed metacognitive abilities. Animal subjects might be using associative mechanisms between exteroceptive stimuli rather than basing their judgments on evaluations of their own uncertainty. We address this criticism by summarizing recent studies in our laboratory using the uncertainty response method in which associative cues are minimized by making stimuli unpredictable, by dissociating specific responses from external feedback cues, and by using transfer tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metacognitive index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., & Washburn, D. A. (2006). Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) monitor uncertainty during numerosity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Carpenter, M. (2001). Do apes and children know what they have seen? Animal Cognition, 4, 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P. (2008). Meta-cognition in animals: A skeptical look. Mind and Language, 23, 58–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, J. & Foote, A., (2009). Metacognition in animals. Comparative Cognition and Behavioral Reviews, 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote, A., & Crystal, J. (2007). Metacognition in the rat. Current Biology, 17, 551–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G. (1982). Self-awareness and the emergence of mind in primates. American Journal of Primatology, 2, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G., Povinelli, D. J., & Suarez, S. D. (1995). Further reflections on self-recognition in primates. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1525–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, R. R. (2001). Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(9), 5359–5362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, R. R. (2009). Multiple demonstrations of metacognition in nonhumans: Converging evidence or multiple mechanisms? Comparative Cognition and Behavioral Reviews, 4, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, R. R., Zivin, A., & Murray, E. A. (2004). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting. Animal Cognition, 7, 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of intellect. In P. P. G. Bateson & R. A. Hinde (Eds.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 303–317). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, A., & Shettleworth, S. J. (1999). Detecting metamemory in nonverbal subjects: A test with pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jozefowiez, J., Staddon, J. E. R., & Cerutti, D. (2009). Metacognition in animals: How do we know that they know? Comparative Cognition and Behavioral Reviews, 4, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (2008). Subjective confidence in one’s answers: The consensuality principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 945–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornell, N., Son, L., & Terrace, H. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Kober, H. (2005). Self-reflective consciousness and the projectable self. In H. S. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-­reflective consciousness (pp. 57–83). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. L. (1906). An introduction to comparative psychology. London: Walter Scott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. (Ed.). (1992). Metacognition: Core readings. Toronto, Canada: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson. T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. T., Mitchell, R. W., & Boccia, M. L. (1994). Self-awareness in animals and humans: Developmental perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paukner, A., Anderson, J. R., & Fujita, K. (2006). Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): A failure of metacognition? Animal Cognition, 9, 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust, J. (2007). Metacognition and metarepresentation: Is a self-directed theory of mind a precondition for metacognition? Synthese, 2, 271–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2005). Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1258–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, W. E., Smith, J. D., & Washburn, D. A. (1997). Uncertain responses by humans and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a psychophysical same-different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, W. E., Smith, J. D., Guttmannova, K., & Washburn, D. A. (2005). Confidence judgments by humans and rhesus monkeys. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Beran, M. J., Couchman, J. C., Coutinho, M. V. C., & Boomer, J. (2009). Animal metacognition: Problems and prospects. Comparative Cognition and Behavioral Reviews, 4, 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Beran, M. J., Couchman, J. C., & Coutinho, M. V. C. (2008). The comparative study of metacognition: Sharper paradigms, safer inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 679–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Beran, M. J., Redford, J. S., & Washburn, D. A. (2006). Dissociating uncertainty states and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 282–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Schull, J., Strote, J., McGee, K., Egnor, R., & Erb, L. (1995). The uncertain response in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., Allendoerfer, K. R., & Washburn, D. A. (1998). Memory monitoring by animals and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., Schull, J., & Washburn, D. A. (1997). The uncertain response in humans and animals. Cognition, 62, 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Shields, W. E., & Washburn, D. A. (2003). The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 317–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, L. K., & Kornell, N. (2005). Metaconfidence judgments in rhesus macaques: Explicit versus implicit mechanisms. In H. S. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness (pp. 296–320). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R., Jozefowiez, J., & Cerutti, D. (April 13, 2007). Metacognition: A problem not a process. PsyCrit, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suda, C., & Call, J. (2006). What does an intermediate success rate mean? An analysis of a Piagetian liquid conservation task in the great apes. Cognition, 99, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suda-King, C. (2008). Do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) know when they do not remember? Animal Cognition, 7, 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. E., & Shettleworth, S. J. (2008). Memory without awareness: Pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching-to-sample. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1994). Preface. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 6–8). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. A., Smith, J. D., & Shields, W. E. (2006). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) immediately generalize the uncertain response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many people have contributed to this research program, and we offer special thanks to David Washburn, Wendy Shields, Joshua Redford, Barbara Church, John Gulledge, Ted Evans, and Mary Beran. This research is supported by Grant BCS-0634662 from the National Science Foundation and Grants HD-38051 and HD 061455 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Correspondence can be sent to the first author at mjberan@yahoo.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Beran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beran, M.J., Couchman, J.J., Coutinho, M.V.C., Boomer, J., Smith, J.D. (2010). Metacognition in Nonhumans: Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Uncertainty Monitoring. In: Efklides, A., Misailidi, P. (eds) Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics