Skip to main content

Metacognition in Young Children: Current Methodological and Theoretical Developments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Abstract

The established orthodoxy within metacognition research has been that metacognitive skills emerge around the age of 8–10 years. However, this position has been challenged by recent research at both the methodological and theoretical levels. Methodologically, it is now recognised that research relying on self-report or verbally-based methodologies may significantly underestimate the metacognitive performance of young children. Recent studies have used observations of children’s behaviours in naturalistic settings and found evidence of metacognitive and self-regulatory behaviours in much younger children. This methodological advance is closely tied to the development of theoretical models of the emergence of metacognition and its relation to other early cognitive developments. This chapter reviews current research using observational methods, and tasks which reduce the dependence on young children’s verbal abilities, which has explored metacognitive development in typically developing young children, and in young children with learning and motor difficulties. Within the typically developing group, studies are reported which have explored the relation between early metacognition and inhibition, theory of mind and conceptual development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Inter-relationship of knowledge, interest and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeqdad, Q. (2008a). Self-explanation and explanation in children with learning difficulties. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeqdad, Q. (2008b). Self-explanation in children with learning difficulties: differences in age, ability and academic achievement. Paper presented at 3rd Biennial Meeting of EARLI Special Interest Group 16: Metacognition, Ioannina, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annevirta, T., & Vauras, M. (2006). Developmental changes of metacognitive skill in elementary school children. Journal of Experimental Education, 74(3) 197–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, K., & Estes, D. (1996). Individual differences in children’s developing theory of mind and implications for metacognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C., Zelazo, P. D., & Greenberg, M. T. (Eds.). (2005). Measurement of executive function in early childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(2), 561–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blöte, A. W., Resing, W. C., Mazer, P., & Van Noort, D. A. (1999). Young children’s organizational strategies on a same-different task: A microgenetic study and a training study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning: Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 417–450). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bright-Paul, A., Jarrold, C., & Wright, D. B. (2008). Theory-of-mind development influences suggestibility and source monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1055–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson, M. B. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65–116). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 4, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, D. (2007). Investigating the relationship between metacognitive skill and executive functions: A pilot study to assess developmental changes in four to eight-year-olds. Unpublished MPhil thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, D., & Whitebread, D. (2008). Investigating the relationship between metacognitive skills and executive functions. Paper presented at 3rd Biennial Meeting of EARLI Special Interest Group 16: Metacognition, Ioannina, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, R. J., & Reynolds, A. R. (Eds.) (1999). Psychology in education port-folio: Learning style and metacognition. Berkshire, UK: NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. M., Wong, A., Lemke, M., & Cosser, C. (2005). Gesture as a window on children’s beginning understanding of false belief. Child Development, 76, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 161–238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., & Florian, L. (2004). Teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs: A scoping study (Research Report No 516). London, UK: Department for Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deak, G. O., & Narasimham, G. (2003). Is perseveration caused by inhibition failure? Evidence from preschool children’s inferences about word meanings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86(3), 194–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloache, J. S., Sugarman, S., & Brown, A. L. (1985). The development of error correction strategies in young children’s manipulative play. Child Development, 56, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, D. (2009). Inter-relationships in children’s socio-cognitive development: The case of false belief understanding. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, D., & Whitebread, D. (2008). Theory of mind and metacognitive knowing: Have we been investigating similar constructs without realising it? Paper presented at 3rd Biennial Meeting of EARLI Special Interest Group 16: Metacognition, Ioannina, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermitzaki, I., Leondari, A., & Goudas, M. (2009). Relations between young children’s strategic behaviours, domain-specific self-concept, and performance in a problem-solving situation. Learning and Instruction, 19, 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, C. L., & Berk, L. E. (2002). Self-regulation in young children: Is there a role for sociodramatic play? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(2), 216–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, M. (1996). Observing the observer: Self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skills. Developmental Review, 16, 203–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, G. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Automatic self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and applications (pp. 151–170). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R., & Chinsky, J. M. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a function of age. Child Development, 37, 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florian, L. (Ed.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of special education. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, E., O’ Malley, C., & Wood, D. (2004). A longitudinal, microgenetic study of the emergence of false belief understanding and inhibition skills. Developmental Science, 7(1), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Baker, S., Pugach, M., with Scanlon, D., & Chard, D. (2001). Contemporary research on special education teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 695–748). Washington, DC: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Constructing communication by hand. Cognitive Development, 17, 1385–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., & Graf, P. (1988). Knowing how you know: Young children’s ability to identify and remember the sources of their beliefs. Child Development, 59, 1366–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau Cárdenas, V. (2008a). In the cross-roads of self-regulated learning (SRL) and conceptual understanding: To what extent does it explain individual differences in learning and development? Paper presented at 3rd Biennial Meeting of EARLI Special Interest Group 16: Metacognition, Ioannina, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau Cárdenas, V. (2008b). Self-regulated learning and conceptual development in biology: A naturalistic study with primary school children. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happe, F., Booth, R., Charlton, R., & Hughes, C. (2006). Executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Examining profiles across domains and ages. Brain and Cognition, 61, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, L., & Gelman, S. (1994). Toward a topography of mind: An introduction to domain specificity. In L. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 3–35). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially shared metacognition in peer-learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 147–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children’s naïve thinking about the biological world. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istomina, Z. M. (1975). The development of voluntary memory in preschool age children. Soviet Psychology, 13, 5–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Problem-solving processes in children’s construction and representations of closed railway circuits. Archives de Psychologie, 17, 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpov, Y. V. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K. (2007). Quantitative research synthesis: Meta-analysis of research on meeting special educational needs. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (pp. 207–221). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbaum, D. S. (1984). Self-regulation of sport psychology: Nurturing an emerging symbiosis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(2), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, S. C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 301–326). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, C.S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. A. Ageyev, & S. A. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 99–116). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Limón, M. (2003). The role of domain-specific knowledge in intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 133–170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, S. E., & Bowler, D. M. (2009). Recognition memory, self-other source memory, and theory-of-mind in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders [On-line]. Available: http://www.springerlink.com/content/m5558v5x1n337617/

  • Lloyd, M., Ried, G., & Bouffard, M. (2006). Self-regulation of sport specific and educational problem-solving tasks by boys with and without DCD. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 23(4), 370–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2007). Knowledge about the mind: Links between theory of mind and later metamemory. Child Development, 78(1), 148–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk Self-regluated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed., pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, T., & Ulich, M. (2009). Social-emotional well-being and resilience of children in early childhood settings – PERIK: An empirically based observation scale for practitioners. Early Years, 29(1), 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naito, M. (2003). The relationship between theory of mind and episodic memory: Evidence for the development of autonoetic consciousness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 312–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–141). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., & Lang, B. (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, N. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1977). The crasp of consciousness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, K. J., Lufkin, N., & Messer, D. (2004). More gestures than answers: Children learning about balance. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1059–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino Pasternak, D., Whitebread, D., & Tolmie, A. (2010). A multi-dimensional analysis of parent-child interactions during academic tasks and their impact on children’s self-regulated learning. Cognition and Instruction, 28(3), 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polatajko, H. J., & Mandich, A. (2004). Enabling occupation in children: The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponitz, C. E. C., McClelland, M. M., Jewkes, A. M., Connor, C. M., Farris C. L., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Touch your toes! Developing a direct measure of behavioural regulation in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 141–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, L. M. (Ed.). (1996). Implicit memory and metacognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K. L., & Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of temperament at 3–7 years: The Children’s Behaviour Questionnaire. Child Development, 72(5), 1394–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffman, T., Garnham, W., Import, A., & Connolly, D. (2001). Does eye gaze indicate implicit knowledge of false belief? Charting transitions in knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, D. (2004). Dynamic Master Mind: Interactive use of a game for testing metacognition. School Psychology International, 25, 422–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction – What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation of learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangster, C. A. (2009a). The role of self-regulation in motor learning: Studying the differences between children with and without motor learning difficulties. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangster, C. A. (2009b, August). The role of self-regulatory and metacognitive skill in motor learning: exploring responses to intervention amongst children with and without motor difficulties. Paper presented to the 13th EARLI Biennial Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangster, C. A., Beninger, C., Polatajko, H. J., & Mandich, A. (2005). Cognitive strategy generation in children with developmental coordination disorder. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1985). Developmental trends in the metamemory-memory behaviour relationship: An intergrative review. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. McKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance: Vol. 1 Theoretical perspectives (pp. 57–109). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1998). Memory. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2, Cognition, perception and language (5th ed., pp. 467–521). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The processes of change in children’s thinking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition process in development and learning (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I. & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension, Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, D., & Chambers, M. (2005). Models of intervention: Towards an eco-developmental approach. In D. Sugden & M. Chambers (Eds.), Children with developmental coordination disorder (pp. 189–211). London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., Esbensen, B. M., & Bennett, R. T. (1994). Children’s understanding of knowledge acquisition: The tendency for children to report that they have always known what they have just learnt. Child Development, 65, 1581–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2000). Asessing active self-directed learning. In R. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 83–101). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75–97). Berlin: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition & Learning, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M. (1985). The origins of metacognition. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. McKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance: Vol. 1. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–31). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory of mind tasks. Child Development, 75, 523–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread, D. (1999). Interactions between children’s metacognitive processes, working memory, choice of strategies and performance during problem-solving, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(4), 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread, D., Anderson, H., Coltman, P., Page, C., Pino Pasternak, D., & Mehta, S. (2005). Developing independent learning in the early years. Education 3–13, 33, 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V., Pino Pasternak, D., & Sangster, C. (2007). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: The role of collaborative and peer-assisted learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 433–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pino Pasternak, D., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread, D., & Pino Pasternak, D. (2010). Metacognition, Self-Regulation & Meta-Knowing. In Littleton, K., Wood, C. & Kleine Staarman, J. (eds) International Handbook of Psychology in Education (pp. 673–711). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd Ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Whitebread .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitebread, D., Almeqdad, Q., Bryce, D., Demetriou, D., Grau, V., Sangster, C. (2010). Metacognition in Young Children: Current Methodological and Theoretical Developments. In: Efklides, A., Misailidi, P. (eds) Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics