Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender and Personality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology

Abstract

Personality is the study of individual differences and thus holds promise for a better understanding of how our gendered society shapes and reinforces differences in women’s and men’s attitudes, emotions, and behaviors. Two strengths of present-day personality research are particularly relevant for the study of gender. First, personality researchers gather data from large samples of normally functioning individuals and emphasize the importance of accurate generalizations of their findings to other normal samples. This methodology allows for the veridical assessment of similarity and difference trends in women’s and men’s personality characteristics. Second, is the attention personality researchers typically give to the careful measurement of constructs through adequate sampling of concept domains, empirical validation, and reliability checks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allgood-Merton, B., & Stockard, J. (1991). Sex role identity and self-esteem: A comparison of children and adolescents. Sex Roles, 25, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2004). Interpersonal perceptions of the five factor model of personality: An examination using the structural summary method for circumplex data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 167–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (2006). NEO-FFI scores in college men and women: A view from McDonald’s unified treatment of test theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 911–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, T. J. (2004). Genetic influence on human psychological traits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozionelos, N., & Bozionelos, G. (2003). Instrumental and expressive traits: Their relationship and their association with biological sex. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. A. (2002). The relevance of mitigated and unmitigated agency and communion for depression vulnerabilities and dysphoria. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummett, B. H., Babyak, M. A., Williams, R. B., Barefoot, J. C., Costa, P. T., & Siegler, I. C. (2006). NEO personality domains and gender predict levels and trends in body mass index over 14 years during midlife. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R., & Gilstrap, C. M. (2002). Explaining sex differences in interaction goals in support situations: Some mediating effects of expressivity and instrumentality. Communication Reports, 15, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity–femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Unger, R. (2004). Women and gender: A feminist psychology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinda, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, J. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldt, T., Metsapelto, R., Kinnunen, U., & Pulkkinen, L. (2007). Sense of coherence and five-factor approach to personality: Conceptual relationships. European Psychologist, 12, 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fertman, C. I., & Chubb, N. H. (1992). The effects of a psychoeducational program on adolescents’ activity involvement, self-esteem, and locus of control. Adolescence, 27, 517–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, G. O. (2005). Mind, brain, and personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 648–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gard, D. E., Gard, M. G., Kring, A. M., & John, O. P. (2006). Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1086–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2005). Compassion and cruelty: A biopsychosocial approach. In P. Gilbert (Ed.), Compassion: Conceptualisations, research, and use in psychotherapy (pp. 9–74). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1993). Causes and consequences of low self-esteem in children and adolescents. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 87–116). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N. (1997). Evidence that male sexual orientation is a matter of degree. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 862–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D., Watson, D., Komar, J., Min, J., & Perunovic, W. Q. E. (2007). Contextualized personality: Traditional and new assessment procedures. Journal of Personality, 75, 1229–1253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helwig-Larson, M., Cunningham, S. J., Carrico, A., & Pergram, A. M. (2004). To nod or not to nod: An observational study of nonverbal communication and status in female and male college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 358–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, K. S., & Betz, N. E. (2006). Path models of the relationship of instrumentality and expressiveness, social self-efficacy, and self-esteem to depressive symptoms in college students. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 1086–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L., Powlishta, K. K., & White, K. J. (2004). An examination of gender differences in adolescent adjustment: The effect of competence on gender role differences in symptoms of psychopathology. Sex Roles, 50, 795–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. G. (1993). Expressiveness does predict well-being. Sex Roles, 29, 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, R. F., & Cooper, M. L. (1994). Gender roles as mediators of sex differences in expression of pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. H., Chernovetz, M. E., & Hansson, R. O. (1978). The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, P. L., Shafer, M. E., Neumann, C. S., & Ramos, V. (2005). Self-concept in Mexican American girls and boys: Validating the Self-Description Questionnaire I. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 11, 321–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, M., Hecht, M., & Paluck, E. L. (2003). Contingent smile: Meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 305–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lengua, L. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2000). Gender, gender roles, and personality: Gender differences in the prediction of coping and psychological symptoms. Sex Roles, 43, 787–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (2001). On deconstructing and reconstructing masculinity–femininity. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 168–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2005). Sexual orientation and personality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 119–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lodhi, P. H., Deo, S., & Belhekar, V. M. (2002). The five-factor model of personality: Measurement and correlates in the Indian context. In R. R. McCrae, & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 227–248). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., & Martin, T. (1997). Gender differences in extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism in 37 countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 369–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Barr, L., Zubek, J., & Babey, S. H. (1999). Gender and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. In W. B. Swann, J. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 223–253). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstead, A. (1992). Gender differences in emotion. In A. Gale, & M. W. Eysenck (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences: Biological perspectives (pp. 355–387). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1988). Self-Description Questionnaire II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1992a). Self-Description Questionnaire II: Manual. Macarthur, Australia: Publication Unit, Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1992b). Self-Description Questionnaire III: Manual. Macarthur, Australia: Publication Unit, Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 687–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Parada, R. H., & Ayotte, V. (2004). A multidimensional perspective of relations between self-concept (Self-Description Questionnaire II) and adolescent mental health (Youth Self-Report). Psychological Assessment, 16, 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. A., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., & Senin, I. G. (2000, July). Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R. Paper presented at the International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: Exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69, 819–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Yik, M. S. M. (1996). Universal aspects of Chinese personality structure. In M. H. Bond (Ed.)? The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 189–207). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. J. (2001). Gender differences in illusion response: The influence of spatial strategy and sex ratio. Sex Roles, 44, 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, D. S, Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L., & Rude, S. S. (2007). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillard, R. C. (1991). Masculinity and femininity in homosexuality: “Inversion” revisited. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy (pp. 32–43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Ballentine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W. (2007). Contextualizing personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 75, 1071–1082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, G., & Strul, S. (2006). The five factor model (FFM) among four groups of male and female professionals. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 931–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., Di Dio, L., & Aube, J. (1997). Agency, communion, and well-being: Extending Helgeson’s (1994) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the big five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, J. G., Mehl, M. R., & Josephs, R. A. (2006). Hormones and personality: Testosterone as a marker of individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapka, J. D., & Keating, D. P. (2005). Structure and change in self-concept during adolescence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, M. J., Heppner, P. P., & Dixon, W. A. (1995). Gender role conflict, instrumentality, expressiveness, and well-being in adult men. Sex Roles, 33, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers in sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E. (1992). Gender differences and similarities in self-concept within everyday life contexts. Psychological of Women Quarterly, 16, 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E. (1994). Development and validation of the Six-Factor Self-Concept Scale for Adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and instrumentality in real-life settings: A new perspective on the benefits of androgyny. Sex Roles, 37, 541–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E. (2000). When situations call for instrumentality and expressiveness: Resource appraisal, coping strategy choice, and adjustment. Sex Roles, 42, 865–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E., Zand, D., & Smalley, R. (1996). The relation of instrumentality and expressiveness to self-concept and adjustment: A social context perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. A., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1992). The effect of agency and communality on self-esteem: Gender differences in longitudinal data. Sex Roles, 26, 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2007). Identity theory and personality theory: Mutual relevance. Journal of Personality, 75, 1083–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Chang-Schneider, C., & McClarty, K. L. (2007). Do people’s self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist, 62, 84–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. J. O., (2003). Mind reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1079–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilgenbusch, T., & Merrell, K. W. (1999). Gender differences in self-concept among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of multidimensional studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the personality and role identity structural model (PRISM). Journal of Personality, 74, 779–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhill, B. M., & Samuels, C. A. (2003). Positive and negative androgyny and their relationship with psychological health and well-being. Sex Roles, 48, 555–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self-concept (Vol. 1). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (2006). A taxonomy of situations from Chinese idioms. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 750–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanico, B. J., & Lu, T. G. C. (2000). A psychometric evaluation of the Six-Factor Self-Concept Scale in a sample of racial/ethnic minority women. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D. (2003). Women and gender: Transforming psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Jayne E. Stake & Heather Eisele

Authors
  1. Jayne E. Stake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather Eisele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Connecticut College, Mohegan Avenue 270, New London, 06320, U.S.A.

    Joan C. Chrisler

  2. Elm Street 38, Toronto, M5G 2K5, Canada

    Donald R. McCreary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stake, J.E., Eisele, H. (2010). Gender and Personality. In: Chrisler, J., McCreary, D. (eds) Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation