Skip to main content

Assessment of Bayesian Item Response Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bayesian Item Response Modeling

Part of the book series: Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences ((SSBS))

  • 3851 Accesses

Abstract

The underlying assumptions of Bayesian item response models have to be examined to ensure their credibility and that meaningful inferences can be made. A set of tools will be discussed for testing model assumptions and hypotheses. This set of tools includes methods based on Bayesian residuals and predictive diagnostic checks. It will be shown that related computations can be done during an MCMC estimation procedure or afterwards using MCMC output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fox, JP. (2010). Assessment of Bayesian Item Response Models. In: Bayesian Item Response Modeling. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0742-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics