Skip to main content

Biosocial Criminology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Crime and Deviance

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Biosocial criminology is a perspective that takes seriously the fact that any meaningful human action is always the result of individual propensities interacting with environmental instigation. Moir and Jessel (1995, p. 10) have asserted that “the evidence that biology is a central factor in crime, interacting with cultural, social, and economic factors, is so strong…that to ignore it is perverse.” Yet it is ignored more often than not, and few criminologists consider themselves “perverse” for doing so. Biosocial criminologists know how difficult it will be to convince their mostly sociologically trained colleagues (Walsh & Ellis, 2004) that the biosocial perspective has much to offer, for it has been said that sociologists are not simply oblivious to biology, but “militantly and proudly ignorant” (van den Berghe, 1990, p. 177).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. Los Angeles: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J. (2005). Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amateau, S., & McCarthy, M. (2004). Induction of PGE2 by estradiol mediates developmental masculinization of sex behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1994). The code of the streets. The Atlantic Monthly, 5, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W., & Summers, C. (2007). Neuroendocrine mechanisms, stress coping strategies, and social dominance: Comparative lessons about leadership potential. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 614, 102–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An analysis of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badcock, C. (2000). Evolutionary psychology: A critical introduction. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L., Bezdjian, S., & Raine, A. (2006). Behavior genetics: The science of antisocial behavior. Law and Contemporary Problems, 69, 7–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, J. (1989). Darwin, sex and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, J. (1997). Happiness in evolutionary perspective. In N. Segal, G. Weisfeld, & C. Weisfeld (Eds.), Uniting psychology and biology (pp. 397–418). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R., Smart, L., & Boden, J. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, K., Wright, J., DeLisi, M., Walsh, A., Vaughn, M., Boisvert, D., et al. (2007). A gene X gene interaction between DRD2 and DRD4 in the etiology of conduct disorder and antisocial behavior. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 30, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, K., Wright, J., & Walsh, A. (2008). A gene-based evolutionary explanation for the association between criminal involvement and number of sex partners. Social Biology, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A., Lesch, K., Heills, A., Long, J., Lorenz, J., Shoaf, S., et al. (2002). Early experience and serotonin transporter gene variation interact to influence primate CNS functioning. Molecular Psychiatry, 7, 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, R., & Saunders, P. (1999). Routes of success: Influences on the occupational attainment of young British males. British Journal of Sociology, 50, 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., Granger, D., Mazur, A., & Kivligan, K. (2006). Testosterone and social behavior. Social Forces, 85, 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Bzostek, S. (2003, August). Violence in the lives of children. Child Trend Data Bank Cross Currents. http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org.

  • Butcher, L., Meaburn, E., Liu, L., Fernandes, C., Hill, L., Al-Chalabi, A., et al. (2004). Genotyping pooled DNA on microarrays: A systematic genome screen of thousands of SNPs in large sample to detect QTLs for complex traits. Behavior Genetics, 34, 549–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, L., Ucapher, M., Kilpatrick, L., Alkire, M., & Turner, J. (2004). Sex-related hemispheric lateralization of amygdala function and emotionally influenced memory: An fMRI investigation. Learning and Memory, 11, 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2009). Gender and crime: An evolutionary perspective. In A. Walsh & K. M. Beaver (Eds.), Biosocial criminology (pp. 113–136). New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, X., Rothhammer, P., Moraga, M., Henríquez, H., Chakraborty, R., Aboitiz, F., et al. (2006). Genotypic interaction between DRD4 and DAT1 loci is a high risk factor for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Chilean families. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 141B, 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2005). Intellectual competence. The Psychologist, 18, 352–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, H., Wiebe, R., van den Oord, E., & Rowe, D. (2000). Behavior problems among children from different family structures: The influence of genetic self-selection. Child Development, 71, 733–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2004). Onset and desistence in criminal careers: Neurobiology and the age-crime relationship. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, E. (2004). The concept of epigenetics and its role in the development of cardiovascular disease. Biological Research for Nurses, 6, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depue, R., & Collins, P. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLisi, M. (2005). Career criminals in society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiRago, A., & Vaillant, G. (2007). Resilience in inner city youth: Childhood predictors of occupational status across the lifespan. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 36, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (2003). Genes, criminality, and the evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory. In A. Walsh & L. Ellis (Eds.). Biosocial criminology: Challenging environmentalism’s supremacy (pp. 13–34). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., & Walsh, A. (2000). Criminology: A global perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, M., & Ember, C. (1998). Facts of violence. Anthropology Newsletter, October, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (2007). Crime in the United States: 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R., & Haynie, D. (2002). Pubertal development, social factors, and delinquency among adolescent boys. Criminology, 40, 967–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, D. (1992). The psychobiology of female aggression. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 9–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (1998). Testosterone is not alone: Internal secretions and external behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 375–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S., & McBurney, D. (2001). Psychology: An evolutionary approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giedd, J. (2004). Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. New York: Commonwealth Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, E. (2001). The executive brain: Frontal lobes and the civilized mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnar, M., & Quevedo, K. (2007). The neurobiology of stress and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpending, H., & Draper, P. (1988). Antisocial behavior and the other side of cultural evolution. In T. Moffitt & S. Mednick (Eds.), Biological contributions to crime causation (pp. 293–307). Dordrecht: Martinus Nyhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, S., Moffitt, T., Caspi, A., & Taylor, A. (2003). Life with (or without) father: The benefits of living with two biological parents depend on the father’s antisocial behavior. Child Development, 74, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T., Higgins, C., Thoresen, C., & Barrick, M. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the lifespan. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., & Snidman, N. (2007). Temperament and biology. In D. Coch, K. Fischer, & G. Dawson (Eds.), Human behavior, learning, and the developing brain: Typical development (pp. 219–246). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa, S. (2003). A general evolutionary psychological theory of criminality and related male-typical behavior. In A. Walsh & L. Ellis (Eds.), Biosocial criminology: Challenging environmentalism’s supremacy (pp. 37–60). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Williams, B., Newcombe, R., Craig, I., et al. (2006). MAOA, maltreatment, and gene-environment interaction predicting children’s mental health: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 903–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American, 267, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyl-Heku, L., & Buss, D. (1996). Tactics as units of analysis in personality psychology: An illustration using tactics of hierarchy negotiation. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 497–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemery, K., & Goldsmith, H. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on preschool sibling cooperation and conflict: Associations with difficult temperament and parenting style. Marriage and Family Review, 33, 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, J., Cullen, F., & Ball, R. (2007). Criminological theory: Context and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analytic analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Rangel, E., & Lewis, M. (2006). Loud and clear evidence for gene silencing by epigenetic mechanisms in autism spectrum and related neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical Genetics, 69, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopreato, J., & Crippen, T. (1999). Crisis in sociology: The need for Darwin. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. (1997). Incorporating intelligence into epidemiology and the social sciences. Intelligence, 24, 159–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (1990). Testosterone and gonadotropin levels and r/K reproductive strategies. Psychological Reports, 67, 1203–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (1996). Dysgenics: Genetic deterioration in modern populations. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (2005). Biosociology of dominance and deference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Litterfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (2009). Testosterone and violence among young men. In A. Walsh & K. M. Beaver (Eds.), Biosocial criminology (pp. 190–204). New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P., & Josephs, R. (2006). Testosterone change after losing predicts the decision to compete again. Hormones and Behavior, 50, 684–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S., & Mihalic, S. (2001). The tripartite conceptual framework in adolescence in adolescence and adulthood: Evidence from a national sample. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 905–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, D., & Carey, G. (1997). Genetic and environmental architecture of human aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffit, T., & the E-Risk Study Team. (2002). Teen-aged mothers in contemporary Britain. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moir, A., & Jessel, D. (1995). A mind to crime. London: Michael Joseph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (1997). IQ and economic success. Public Interest, 128, 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K., & White, J. (2002). Androgen receptor CAG repeats and prostate cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 883–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2003). Intelligence and class mobility in the British population. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 551–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, D. (2003). A vicious circle: The neurobiological foundations of violent behavior. Modern Psychoanalysis, 28, 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, F. (2006). Achievement and ascription in educational attainment: Genetic and environmental influences on adolescent schooling. Social Forces, 85, 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyborg, H. (2004). Multivariate modeling of testosterone-dominance associations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osofsky, J. (1995). The effects of exposure to violence on young children. American Psychologist, 50, 782–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. (2002). Childhood experience and the expression of genetic potential: What childhood neglect tells us about nature and nurture. Brain and Mind, 3, 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. & Pollard, R. (1998). Homeostasis, stress, trauma, and adaptation: A neurodevelopmental view of childhood trauma. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of America, 7, 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petronis, A., & Gottesman, I. (2000). Psychiatric epigenetics: A new focus for the new century. Molecular Psychiatry, 5, 342–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., & Asbury, K. (2005). Nature and nurture: Genetic and environmental influences on behavior. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600, 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, K. (2006). How does the teenage brain work? Nature, 442, 865–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. (2002). Evolutionary theory and criminal behavior. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restak, R. (2001). The secret life of the brain. New York: Co-published by Dana Press and Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, S., & Waldman, I. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 490–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (2003). Nature via nurture: Genes, experience and what makes us human. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (2004). Why crime? An integrated systems theory of antisocial behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romaine, C., & Reynolds, C. (2005). A model of the development of frontal lobe functioning: Findings from a meta-analysis. Applied Neuropsychology, 12, 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper v. Simons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. (1996). An adaptive strategy theory of crime and delinquency. In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 268–314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D., Jacobson, K., & Van den Oord, E. (1999). Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary IQ: Parents education level as moderator. Child Development, 70, 1151–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (2007). Gene-environment interdependence. Developmental Science, 10, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F., & Hunter, K. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, R., & Silven, M. (2007). Natural parenting—back to basics in infant care. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 102–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, Y., & Rattner, A. (1988). Age, crime, and the early lifecourse. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 1457–1470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1972). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, R. (1997). Rethinking the brain: New insights into early development. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J., Campione-Barr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 255–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, E., Thompson, P., & Toga, A. (2004). Mapping changes in the human cortex throughout the span of life. Neuroscientist, 10, 372–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, M., Corely, R., Dennhey, B., Hewwitt, J., Krauter, K., Lessem, J., et al. (2005). A genome-wide search for quantitative trait loci that influence antisocial drug dependence in adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 1042–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (2003). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berghe, P. (1990). Why most sociologists don’t (and won’t) think evolutionarily. Sociological Forum, 5, 173–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Goozen, S., Fairchild, G., Snoek, H., Harold, G. (2007). The evidence for a neurobiological model of childhood antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 149–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vila, B. (1994). A general paradigm for understanding criminal behavior: Extending evolutionary ecological theory. Criminology, 32, 311–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volavka, J. (2002). Neurobiology of violence (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E. (2002). Adolescent neurodevelopment and psychopathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (1997). Methodological individualism and vertical integration in the social sciences. Behavior and Philosophy, 25, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (2000). Behavior genetics and anomie/strain theory. Criminology, 38, 1075–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (2002). Biosocial criminology: Introduction and integration. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (2006). Evolutionary psychology and criminal behavior. In J. Barkow (Ed.), Missing the revolution: Darwinism for social scientists (pp. 225–268). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (2009). Crazy by design: A biosocial approach to the age-crime curve. In A. Walsh & K. M. Beaver (Eds.), Biosocial criminology (pp. 154–175). New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., & Ellis, L. (2004). Ideology: Criminology’s Achilles’ heel? Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 27, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., & Hemmens, C. (2008). Law, justice and society: A sociolegal approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, E. (2006, November). DNA is not destiny. Discover: Science, technology and the future, 75, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, I., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F., D’Alessio, A., Sharma, S., Seckl, J., et al. (2004). Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior, Nature Neuroscience, 7, 847–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhold, B. (2006). Epigenetics: The science of change. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. (2004). Substance use and the adolescent brain: An overview with the focus on alcohol. Durham, NC: Duke University Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M., & Ferracutti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence: Towards an integrated theory in criminology. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., & Beaver, K. (2005). Do parents matter in creating self-control in their children? A genetically informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory of low self-control. Criminology, 43, 1169–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., Boisvert, D. Dietrich, K., & Ris, D. (2009). The ghost in the machine and criminal behavior: Criminology for the 21st century. In A. Walsh & K. M. Beaver (Eds.), Contemporary biosocial criminology (pp. 73–89). New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walsh, A., Beaver, K.M. (2009). Biosocial Criminology. In: Krohn, M., Lizotte, A., Hall, G. (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0245-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics