Labeling theory provides a distinctively sociological approach that focuses on the role of social labeling in the development of crime and deviance. The theory assumes that although deviant behavior can initially stem from various causes and conditions, once individuals have been labeled or defined as deviants, they often face new problems that stem from the reactions of self and others to negative stereotypes (stigma) that are attached to the deviant label (Becker, 1963; Lemert, 1967). These problems in turn can increase the likelihood of deviant and criminal behavior becoming stable and chronic. In the words of Lemert (1967), deviant behavior can become “means of defense, attack, or adaptation” (p. 17) to the problems created by deviant labeling. Thus, being labeled or defined by others as a criminal offender may trigger processes that tend to reinforce or stabilize involvement in crime and deviance, net of the behavioral pattern and the social and psychological conditions that existed prior to labeling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The current chapter focuses on the effect of labeling and stigma on the development of criminal or deviant behavior and thus does not provide a comprehensive overview of the various dimensions of labeling theory, including its implications for social construction and conflict theory (see Becker, 1963; Melossi, 1985; Paternoster & Iovanni, 1989).
- 2.
Relatedly, conflict theory argues that racial minorities and the impoverished have restricted access to law-making and criminal justice policy, and hence their interests are often not represented in the laws, policies, and organizations that determine the criminalization (labeling) process (Reiman, 1995). Accordingly, deviance associated with the powerless tends to be labeled as criminal, whereas deviance associated with the powerful often escapes criminalization and stigma.
- 3.
Klein (1986) reports that the treatment condition had no effect on self-reported delinquency in a follow-up survey that was conducted about 9 months later on a subsample of the initial sample of offenders. However, the subsample consisted of only those subjects that participated in the follow-up survey, about 60% of the initial sample. These findings are suspect. The null findings may be due to sampling bias in which the more serious offenders tend not to be included in the follow-up survey.
References
Adams, M. S. & Evans, T. D. (1996). Teacher disapproval, delinquent peers, and self-reported delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. The Urban Review, 28, 199–211.
Adams, M. S., Johnson, J. D., & Evans, T. D. (1998). Racial differences in informal labeling effects. Deviant Behavior, 19, 157–171.
Ageton, S., & Elliott, D. (1974). The effect of legal processing on delinquent orientations. Social Problems, 22, 87–100.
Albonetti, C. A., & Hepburn, J. R. (1996). Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: The effects of defendant’s ascribed and achieved status characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 63–81.
Barrick, K. (2007). Being labeled a felon and its consequences for recidivism: An examination of contingent effects. Ph.D. Dissertation, College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, The Florida State University.
Bartusch, D. J., and Matsueda, R. L. (1996). Gender, reflected appraisals, and labeling: A cross-group test of an interactionist theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 75, 145–177.
Baumer, E. P., Wright, R., Kristinsdottir, K, & Gunnlaugsson, H. (2002). Crime, shame, and recidivism: The case of Iceland. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 40–59.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57, 698–708.
Bernburg, J. G. (2003). State reaction, life-outcomes, and structural disadvantage: A panel study of the impact of formal criminal labeling on the transition to adulthood. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University at Albany.
Bernburg, J. G. (2006). Experiencing criminal stigma: Offenders’ perceived reactions of community and self to deviant labeling. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems in Montreal, Canada.
Bernburg, J. G., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41, 1287–1318.
Bernburg, J. G., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 67–88.
Bowditch, C. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems, 40, 493–509.
Bontrager, S., Bales, W., & Chiricos, T. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589–622.
Boshier, R., & Johnson, D. (1974). Does conviction affect employment opportunities? British Journal of Criminology, 14, 264–268.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Buikuisen, W., & Dijksterhuis, F. P. H. (1971). Delinquency and stigmatization. British Journal of Criminology, 11, 185–187.
Chiricos, T., Barrick, K., Bales, W., & Bontrager, S. (2007). The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology, 45, 547–581.
Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Covington, J. (1984). Insulation from labeling. Criminology, 22, 619–643.
Davies, S., & Tanner, J. (2003). The long arm of the law: Effects of labeling on employment. Sociological Quarterly, 44, 385–404.
Davis, F. (1961). Deviance disavowal: The management of strained interaction by the visibly handicapped. Social Problems, 9, 120–132.
De Li, S. (1999). Legal sanctions and youths’ status achievement: A longitudinal study. Justice Quarterly, 16, 377–401.
Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. NY, London, and Sidney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Farrington, D. P. (1977). The effects of public labelling. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 112–125.
Farrington, D. P., Osborn, S. G., & West, D. J. (1978). The persistence of labelling effects. British Journal of Criminology, 18, 277–284.
Freeman, R. (1991). Crime and employment of disadvantaged youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Garfinkel, H. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420–424.
Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. New York: Elsmere.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Goode, E. (1975). On behalf of labeling theory. Social Problems, 22, 570–583.
Hagan, J., & Palloni, A. (1990). The social reproduction of a criminal class in working-class London, 1950–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 265–299.
Harris, A. R. (1976). Race, commitment to deviance, and spoiled identity. American Sociological Review, 41, 432–442.
Harris, P. M., & Keller, K. S. (2005). Ex-offenders need not apply: The criminal background check in hiring decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 6–30.
Hay, C. (2001). An exploratory test of Braithwaite’s reintegrative shaming theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 132–153.
Heimer, K., & Matsueda, R. L. (1994). Role-taking, role commitment, and delinquency: A theory of differential social control. American Sociological Review, 59, 365–390.
Hepburn, J. R. (1977). The impact of police intervention upon juvenile delinquents. Criminology, 15, 235–262.
Hirschi, T. (1980). Labelling theory and juvenile delinquency: An assessment of the evidence. In W. Gove (Ed.), The labelling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (pp. 271–302). 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Hjalmarsson, R. (2008). Criminal justice involvement and high school completion. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 613–630.
Horowitz, A., & Wasserman, M. (1979). The effect of social control on delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test. Sociological Focus, 12, 53–70.
Huizinga, D., & Henry, K. L. (2008). The effect of arrest and justice system sanctions on subsequent behavior: Findings from longitudinal and other studies. In A. M. Liberman (Ed.), The Long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 220–254). New York: Springer.
Irwing, J. (2005). The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class. Los Angeles: Roxbury Press.
Jensen, G. F. (1980). Labeling and identity. Criminology, 18, 121–129.
Johnson, L. M., Simons, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (2004). Criminal justice system involvement and continuity of youth crime. Youth & Society, 36, 3–29.
Kaplan, H. B., & Johnson, R. J. (1991). Negative social sanctions and juvenile delinquency: Effects of labeling in a model of deviant behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 72, 98–122.
Kaufman, J. M., & Johnson, C. (2004). Stigmatized individuals and the process of identity. The Sociological Quarterly, 45, 807–833.
Klein, M. W. (1986). Labeling theory and delinquency policy: An experimental test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 47–79.
Lanctot, N., Cernkovich, S. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). Delinquent behavior, official delinquency, and gender: Consequences for adulthood functioning and well-being. Criminology, 45, 131–157.
Lemert, E. (1967). Human deviance, social problems and social control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Link, B. G. (1982). Mental patient status, work, and income: An examination of the effects of a psychiatric label. American Sociological Review, 47, 202–215.
Link, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Struening, E., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1989). A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment. American Sociological Review, 54, 400–423.
Link, B. G, & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.
Mankoff, M. (1971). Societal reaction and career deviance: A critical analysis. The Sociological Quarterly, 12, 204–217.
Markowitz, F. E. (1998). The effects of stigma on the psychological well-being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 335–347.
Matsueda, R. L. (1992). Reflected appraisal, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1577–1611.
Melossi, D. (1985). Overcoming the crisis in critical criminology: Toward a grounded labeling theory. Criminology, 23, 193–208.
Orcutt, J. D. (1973). Societal reaction and the response to deviation in small groups. Social Forces, 52, 259–67.
Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.
Palarma, F., Cullen, F. T., & Gersten, J. C. (1986). The effect of police and mental health intervention on juvenile deviance: Specifying contingencies in the impact of formal reaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 90–105.
Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6, 359–94.
Quillian, L., & Pager, D. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767.
Ray, M. C., & Downs, W. (1986). An empirical test of labeling theory using longitudinal data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 169–94.
Reiman, J. H. (1995). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class, and criminal justice. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 133–161). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Scheff, T. H. (1966). Becoming mentally ill. Chicago: Aldine.
Schur, E. M. (1971). Labeling deviant behavior: Its sociological implications. New York: Harper and Row.
Schur, E. M. (1980). The politics of deviance: Stigma contests and the uses of power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Schwartz, R. D., & Skolnick, J. H. (1962). Two studies of legal stigma. Social Problems, 10, 133–143.
Sherman, L. W., & Smith, D. A. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680–690.
Simmons, J. L. (1965–6). Public stereotypes of deviants. Social Problems, 13, 223–232.
Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1990). Formal processing and future delinquency: Deviance amplification as selection artifact. Law and Society Review, 24, 1109–1131.
Smith, D. A., Visher, C. A., & Davidson, L. (1984). Equity and discretionary justice: The influence of race on police arrest decisions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 234–249.
Steffensmeyer, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–799.
Stewart, E. A., Simons, R. L., Conger, R. D., & Scaramella, L. V. (2002). Beyond the interactional relationship between delinquency and parenting practices: The contribution of legal sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 36–59.
Sweeten, G. (2006). Who will graduate? Disruptions of high school education by arrest and court involvement. Justice Quarterly, 23, 462–480.
Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and community. Boston: Ginn.
Thomas, C. W., & Bishop, D. M. (1984). The effect of formal and informal sanctions on delinquency: A longitudinal comparison of labeling and deterrence theories. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 75, 1222–1245.
Tittle, C. (1980). Labeling and crime: An empirical evaluation. In W. Gove (Ed.), The labelling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (pp. 241–263). 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Travis, J. (2002). Invisible punishment: An instrument of social exclusion. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 15–36). New York: The New Press.
Triplett, R. A., & Jarjoura, G. R. (1994). Theoretical and empirical specification of a model of informal labeling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 241–276.
Warren, P., Tomaskovic-Devey, T., Smith, W., Zingraff, M., & Mason, M. (2006). Driving while black: Bias processes and racial disparity in police stops. Criminology, 44, 709–738.
Wellford, C. (1975). Labelling theory and criminology: An assessment. Social Problems, 22, 332–345.
Western, B., & Beckett, K. (1999). How unregulated is the U.S. labor market? The penal system as a labor market institution. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1030–60.
Winnick, T. A., & Bodkin, M. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled ‘ex-con’. Deviant Behavior, 29, 295–333.
Worden, R., & Shepard, R. (1996). Demeanor, crime, and police behavior: A reexamination of the police services study data. Criminology, 34, 83–106.
Zhang, L. (1994). Peers rejection as a possible consequence of official reaction to delinquency in Chinese society. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 387–402.
Zhang, L. (1997). Informal reactions and delinquency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 129–150.
Zhang, L. (2003). Official offense status and self-esteem among Chinese youths. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 99–105.
Zhang, L., & Messner, S. F. (1994). The severity of official punishment for delinquency and change in interpersonal relations in Chinese society. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 416–433.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bernburg, J.G. (2009). Labeling Theory. In: Krohn, M., Lizotte, A., Hall, G. (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0245-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0245-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0244-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0245-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)