Skip to main content

Labeling Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Crime and Deviance

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Labeling theory provides a distinctively sociological approach that focuses on the role of social labeling in the development of crime and deviance. The theory assumes that although deviant behavior can initially stem from various causes and conditions, once individuals have been labeled or defined as deviants, they often face new problems that stem from the reactions of self and others to negative stereotypes (stigma) that are attached to the deviant label (Becker, 1963; Lemert, 1967). These problems in turn can increase the likelihood of deviant and criminal behavior becoming stable and chronic. In the words of Lemert (1967), deviant behavior can become “means of defense, attack, or adaptation” (p. 17) to the problems created by deviant labeling. Thus, being labeled or defined by others as a criminal offender may trigger processes that tend to reinforce or stabilize involvement in crime and deviance, net of the behavioral pattern and the social and psychological conditions that existed prior to labeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The current chapter focuses on the effect of labeling and stigma on the development of criminal or deviant behavior and thus does not provide a comprehensive overview of the various dimensions of labeling theory, including its implications for social construction and conflict theory (see Becker, 1963; Melossi, 1985; Paternoster & Iovanni, 1989).

  2. 2.

    Relatedly, conflict theory argues that racial minorities and the impoverished have restricted access to law-making and criminal justice policy, and hence their interests are often not represented in the laws, policies, and organizations that determine the criminalization (labeling) process (Reiman, 1995). Accordingly, deviance associated with the powerless tends to be labeled as criminal, whereas deviance associated with the powerful often escapes criminalization and stigma.

  3. 3.

    Klein (1986) reports that the treatment condition had no effect on self-reported delinquency in a follow-up survey that was conducted about 9 months later on a subsample of the initial sample of offenders. However, the subsample consisted of only those subjects that participated in the follow-up survey, about 60% of the initial sample. These findings are suspect. The null findings may be due to sampling bias in which the more serious offenders tend not to be included in the follow-up survey.

References

  • Adams, M. S. & Evans, T. D. (1996). Teacher disapproval, delinquent peers, and self-reported delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. The Urban Review, 28, 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M. S., Johnson, J. D., & Evans, T. D. (1998). Racial differences in informal labeling effects. Deviant Behavior, 19, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ageton, S., & Elliott, D. (1974). The effect of legal processing on delinquent orientations. Social Problems, 22, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albonetti, C. A., & Hepburn, J. R. (1996). Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: The effects of defendant’s ascribed and achieved status characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, K. (2007). Being labeled a felon and its consequences for recidivism: An examination of contingent effects. Ph.D. Dissertation, College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, The Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartusch, D. J., and Matsueda, R. L. (1996). Gender, reflected appraisals, and labeling: A cross-group test of an interactionist theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 75, 145–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, E. P., Wright, R., Kristinsdottir, K, & Gunnlaugsson, H. (2002). Crime, shame, and recidivism: The case of Iceland. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57, 698–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernburg, J. G. (2003). State reaction, life-outcomes, and structural disadvantage: A panel study of the impact of formal criminal labeling on the transition to adulthood. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University at Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernburg, J. G. (2006). Experiencing criminal stigma: Offenders’ perceived reactions of community and self to deviant labeling. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems in Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernburg, J. G., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41, 1287–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernburg, J. G., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowditch, C. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems, 40, 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontrager, S., Bales, W., & Chiricos, T. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshier, R., & Johnson, D. (1974). Does conviction affect employment opportunities? British Journal of Criminology, 14, 264–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikuisen, W., & Dijksterhuis, F. P. H. (1971). Delinquency and stigmatization. British Journal of Criminology, 11, 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiricos, T., Barrick, K., Bales, W., & Bontrager, S. (2007). The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology, 45, 547–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, J. (1984). Insulation from labeling. Criminology, 22, 619–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., & Tanner, J. (2003). The long arm of the law: Effects of labeling on employment. Sociological Quarterly, 44, 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1961). Deviance disavowal: The management of strained interaction by the visibly handicapped. Social Problems, 9, 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Li, S. (1999). Legal sanctions and youths’ status achievement: A longitudinal study. Justice Quarterly, 16, 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. NY, London, and Sidney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1977). The effects of public labelling. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 112–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Osborn, S. G., & West, D. J. (1978). The persistence of labelling effects. British Journal of Criminology, 18, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (1991). Crime and employment of disadvantaged youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. New York: Elsmere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E. (1975). On behalf of labeling theory. Social Problems, 22, 570–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., & Palloni, A. (1990). The social reproduction of a criminal class in working-class London, 1950–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 265–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. R. (1976). Race, commitment to deviance, and spoiled identity. American Sociological Review, 41, 432–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. M., & Keller, K. S. (2005). Ex-offenders need not apply: The criminal background check in hiring decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2001). An exploratory test of Braithwaite’s reintegrative shaming theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, K., & Matsueda, R. L. (1994). Role-taking, role commitment, and delinquency: A theory of differential social control. American Sociological Review, 59, 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, J. R. (1977). The impact of police intervention upon juvenile delinquents. Criminology, 15, 235–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1980). Labelling theory and juvenile delinquency: An assessment of the evidence. In W. Gove (Ed.), The labelling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (pp. 271–302). 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarsson, R. (2008). Criminal justice involvement and high school completion. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 613–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A., & Wasserman, M. (1979). The effect of social control on delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test. Sociological Focus, 12, 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., & Henry, K. L. (2008). The effect of arrest and justice system sanctions on subsequent behavior: Findings from longitudinal and other studies. In A. M. Liberman (Ed.), The Long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 220–254). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Irwing, J. (2005). The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class. Los Angeles: Roxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. F. (1980). Labeling and identity. Criminology, 18, 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. M., Simons, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (2004). Criminal justice system involvement and continuity of youth crime. Youth & Society, 36, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. B., & Johnson, R. J. (1991). Negative social sanctions and juvenile delinquency: Effects of labeling in a model of deviant behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 72, 98–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. M., & Johnson, C. (2004). Stigmatized individuals and the process of identity. The Sociological Quarterly, 45, 807–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. W. (1986). Labeling theory and delinquency policy: An experimental test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 47–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanctot, N., Cernkovich, S. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). Delinquent behavior, official delinquency, and gender: Consequences for adulthood functioning and well-being. Criminology, 45, 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, E. (1967). Human deviance, social problems and social control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G. (1982). Mental patient status, work, and income: An examination of the effects of a psychiatric label. American Sociological Review, 47, 202–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Struening, E., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1989). A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment. American Sociological Review, 54, 400–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G, & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff, M. (1971). Societal reaction and career deviance: A critical analysis. The Sociological Quarterly, 12, 204–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, F. E. (1998). The effects of stigma on the psychological well-being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L. (1992). Reflected appraisal, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1577–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melossi, D. (1985). Overcoming the crisis in critical criminology: Toward a grounded labeling theory. Criminology, 23, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orcutt, J. D. (1973). Societal reaction and the response to deviation in small groups. Social Forces, 52, 259–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palarma, F., Cullen, F. T., & Gersten, J. C. (1986). The effect of police and mental health intervention on juvenile deviance: Specifying contingencies in the impact of formal reaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, 6, 359–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, L., & Pager, D. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, M. C., & Downs, W. (1986). An empirical test of labeling theory using longitudinal data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 169–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, J. H. (1995). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class, and criminal justice. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 133–161). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. H. (1966). Becoming mentally ill. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. M. (1971). Labeling deviant behavior: Its sociological implications. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. M. (1980). The politics of deviance: Stigma contests and the uses of power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. D., & Skolnick, J. H. (1962). Two studies of legal stigma. Social Problems, 10, 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., & Smith, D. A. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J. L. (1965–6). Public stereotypes of deviants. Social Problems, 13, 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1990). Formal processing and future delinquency: Deviance amplification as selection artifact. Law and Society Review, 24, 1109–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., Visher, C. A., & Davidson, L. (1984). Equity and discretionary justice: The influence of race on police arrest decisions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeyer, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A., Simons, R. L., Conger, R. D., & Scaramella, L. V. (2002). Beyond the interactional relationship between delinquency and parenting practices: The contribution of legal sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeten, G. (2006). Who will graduate? Disruptions of high school education by arrest and court involvement. Justice Quarterly, 23, 462–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and community. Boston: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. W., & Bishop, D. M. (1984). The effect of formal and informal sanctions on delinquency: A longitudinal comparison of labeling and deterrence theories. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 75, 1222–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. (1980). Labeling and crime: An empirical evaluation. In W. Gove (Ed.), The labelling of deviance: Evaluating a perspective (pp. 241–263). 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J. (2002). Invisible punishment: An instrument of social exclusion. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 15–36). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triplett, R. A., & Jarjoura, G. R. (1994). Theoretical and empirical specification of a model of informal labeling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 241–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P., Tomaskovic-Devey, T., Smith, W., Zingraff, M., & Mason, M. (2006). Driving while black: Bias processes and racial disparity in police stops. Criminology, 44, 709–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellford, C. (1975). Labelling theory and criminology: An assessment. Social Problems, 22, 332–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, B., & Beckett, K. (1999). How unregulated is the U.S. labor market? The penal system as a labor market institution. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1030–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winnick, T. A., & Bodkin, M. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled ‘ex-con’. Deviant Behavior, 29, 295–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden, R., & Shepard, R. (1996). Demeanor, crime, and police behavior: A reexamination of the police services study data. Criminology, 34, 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (1994). Peers rejection as a possible consequence of official reaction to delinquency in Chinese society. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (1997). Informal reactions and delinquency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2003). Official offense status and self-esteem among Chinese youths. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & Messner, S. F. (1994). The severity of official punishment for delinquency and change in interpersonal relations in Chinese society. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 416–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernburg, J.G. (2009). Labeling Theory. In: Krohn, M., Lizotte, A., Hall, G. (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0245-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics