Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contributions of Cross-National Research to Criminology at the Beginning of the 21st Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Crime and Deviance

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Although the study of crime did not originate in the United States, for much of the 20th century the discipline had a distinctively American flavor. Describing the state of criminology at the beginning of the 21st century, one scholar declared that “the American criminological enterprise is the largest in the world. Measured by the number of people who focus on the study of crime, law and social control, the number of university courses, the number of scholarly and professional publications and books, the number of research projects and the amount of funding, there is no question that the US takes the cake” (Marshall, 2008, p. 50). American criminologists have been responsible for developing many popular criminological theories, fostering methodological advancements for studying crime, and institutionalizing the discipline within academia. It is not surprising, then, that “for most American scholars, criminology is American criminology” (Marshall, 2008, p. 49, original emphasis).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aas, K. F. (2007). Analysing a world in motion: Global flows meet “criminology of the other”. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces, 75(4), 1149–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, F. (1983). Nations not obsessed with crime. Littleton, CO: Fred B. Rothman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agozino, B. (2004). Imperialism, crime and criminology: Towards the decolonisation of criminology. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 41, 343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvazzi del Frate, A. (2004). The international crime business survey: Findings from nine Central-Eastern European cities. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 10(2–3), 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonaccio, O., & Tittle, C. R. (2007). A cross-national test of Bonger’s theory of criminality and economic conditions. Criminology, 45(4), 925–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. A. (1991). Development and crime in Africa: A test of modernization theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(6), 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. A., & Marenin, O. (1995). Explaining crime in developing countries: The need for a case study approach. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 23, 191–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (Ed.). (2000). Crime and crime control: A global view. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (2001). Crime and crime control in an age of globalization: A theoretical discussion. Critical Criminology, 10(1), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberet, R. (2006). Preface. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22(2), 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (2007). From statistical nuisances to serious modeling: Changing how we think about the analysis of time-series-cross-section data. Political Analysis, 15, 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., & Lynch, J. (1990). Does a difference make a difference? Comparing cross-national crime indicators. Criminology, 38(1), 153–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (1991). Routine activities: A cross-national assessment of a criminological perspective. Social Forces, 70(1), 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2004). Comparative criminology and criminal justice research: The state of our knowledge. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierne, P. (1983). Generalization and its discontents: The comparative study of crime. In E. H. Johnson & I. L. Barak-Glantz (Eds.), Comparative criminology (pp. 19–38). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., & Wallman, J. (Eds.). (2000). The crime drop in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonger, W. A. (1916). Criminality and economic conditions. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botchkovar, E. V., & Tittle, C. R. (2005). Crime, shame, and reintegration in Russia. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 401–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V. (2007). Crime dynamics at Lithuanian borders. European Journal of Criminology, 4(2), 131–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (2006). Economic inequality, legitimacy, and cross-national homicide rates. Homicide Studies, 10(4), 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamlin M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (2007). An evaluation of the assumptions that underlie institutional anomie theory. Theoretical Criminology, 11(1), 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, M. B., & Abbott, D. J. (1973). Crime in developing countries: A comparative perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1982). Western crime control models in the third world: Benign or malignant? Research in Law, Deviance, and Social Control, 4, 85–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dammer, H. R., Reichel, P., & He, N. (2005). Comparing crime and justice. In P. Reichel (Ed.), Handbook of transnational crime and justice (pp. 20–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1933). Division of labor in society. New York: The Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1982). The civilizing process, Vol. 2: Power and incivility. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D., LaGrange, R. L., & Willis, C. L. (1996). Theoretical development of comparative criminology: Rekindling an interest. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 20(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loaza, N. (2002). Crime and violence in Latin America. In D. Levinson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of crime and punishment (pp. 1001–1008). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behavior from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36(6), 929–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (2000). Explaining and preventing crime: The globalization of knowledge – The American Society of Criminology 1999 presidential address. Criminology, 38(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friday, P. C., Ren, X., Weitekamp, E., Kerner, H. -J., & Taylor, T. (2005). A Chinese birth cohort: Theoretical implications. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(2), 123–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: A temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55(1), 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R. (1995). Methodological issues in cross-cultural large-survey research on violence. In R. B. Ruback & N. A. Weiner (Eds.), Interpersonal violent behaviors: Social and cultural aspects (pp. 7–24). New York: Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R., & Parker, R. N. (1990). Cross-national evidence on homicide and the age structure of the population. Social Forces, 69(2), 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, A. R. (1989). Crime and state surveillance in 19th century France. American Journal of Sociology, 95(2), 307–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, S. (1964 [1961]). Wanted: A comparative criminology. In S. Glueck & E. Glueck (Eds.), Ventures in criminology (pp. 306–322). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, M., Smith, T., & Howard, G. J. (2006). Explaining differences in comparative criminological research: An empirical exhibition. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 30(2), 209–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1977). Crime trends in modern democracies since 1945. International Annals of Criminology, 16, 41–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajjar, L. (2004). Religion, state, power, and domestic violence in Muslim societies: A framework for comparative analysis. Law and Social Inquiry, 29(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie-Bick, J., Sheptycki, J., & Wardak, A. (2005). Introduction: Transnational and comparative criminology in a global perspective. In J. Sheptycki & A. Wardak (Eds.), Transnational and comparative criminology (pp. 1–16). London: Glasshouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiland, H., & Shelley, L. I. (1992). Civilization, modernization, and the development of crime and control. In H. Heiland, L. I. Shelley, & H. Katoh (Eds.), Crime and control in comparative perspectives (pp. 1–20). New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippchen, L. (1977). The teaching of comparative and world criminology in graduate schools of sociology and criminal justice. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 1, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, G. J., Newman, G., & Pridemore, W. A. (2000). Theory, method, and data in comparative criminology. In Criminal justice 2000, volume 4: Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 139–211). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. S. W., & Wellford, C. F. (1989). Assessing indicators of crime among international crime data sources. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3(1), 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. H., & Barak-Glantz, I. L. (1983). Introduction. In E. H. Johnson & I. L. Barak-Glantz (Eds.), Comparative criminology (pp. 7–18). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H., Ollus, N., & Nevala, S. (2007). Violence against women: An international perspective. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, G. J., & Klein, M. W. (Eds.). (1994). Delinquent behavior among young people in the Western world: First results of the International Self-Report Delinquency Study. New York: Kluger Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, S. (2001). Comparing cultures, comparing crime: Challenges, prospects and problems for a global criminology. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 36(3), 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, S. (2003). Legacies of a culture of inequality: The Janus face of crime in post-communist countries. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 40, 295–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, S. (2006). Democracy, values, and violence: Paradoxes, tensions, and comparative advantages of liberal inclusion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 50–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, S., & Farrall, S. (2006). The moral economy of everyday crime: Markets, consumers and citizens. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 1011–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, S., & LaFree, G. (2006). Democracy, crime, and justice. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killias, M., & Aebi, M. F. (2000). Crime trends in Europe from 1990 to 1996: How Europe illustrates the limits of the American experience. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(1), 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killias, M., & Rau, W. (2000). The European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics: A new tool in assessing crime and policy issues. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. -W., & Pridemore, W. A. (2005). Social change, institutional anomie, and serious property crime in transitional Russia. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. (1999). A summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 125–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. (2005). Evidence for elite convergence in cross-national homicide victimization trends, 1956 to 2000. Sociological Quarterly, 46(1), 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. (2007). Expanding criminology’s domain: The American Society of Criminology 2006 presidential address. Criminology, 45(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. D., & Drass, K. A. (2002). Counting crime booms among nations: Evidence for homicide victimization rates, 1956 to 1998. Criminology, 40(4), 769–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. D., & Tseloni, A. (2006). Democracy and crime: A multilevel analysis of homicide trends in 44 countries, 1950–2000. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 26–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B., & Lu, H. (2006). Conducting fieldwork in China: Observations on collecting primary data regarding crime, law, and the criminal justice system. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22(2), 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2006). Modernization and crime patterns in China. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(2), 118–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, H. (1965). Comparative criminology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, I. H. (2008). The criminological enterprise in Europe and the United States: A contextual exploration. In N. Larsen & R. Smandych (Eds.), Global criminology and criminal justice: Current issues and perspectives (pp. 47–66). Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, I. H., & Block, R. (2004). Maximizing the availability of cross-national data on homicide. Homicide Studies, 8(3), 267–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976 [1867]). Capital: A critique of political economy. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (1992). Exploring the consequences of erratic data: Reporting for cross-national research on homicide. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 8(2), 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., Raffalovich, L. E., & Shrock, P. (2002). Reassessing the cross-national relationship between income inequality and homicide rates: Implications of data quality control in the measurement of income distribution. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(4), 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. R. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional anomie theory. Social Forces, 75(4), 1393–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. R. (2007). Crime and the American dream. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miethe, T. D., Hart, T. C., & Regoeczi, W. C. (2008). The conjunctive analysis of case configurations: An exploratory method for discrete multivariate analyses of crime data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., van de Bunt, G. G., & de Bruijn, J. (2006). Comparative research: Persistent problems and promising solutions. International Sociology, 21, 619–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mjoset, L., & Clausen, T. H. (Eds.). (2007). Capitalisms compared (Vol. 24). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff, J. D. (1997). Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition: Chicago, 1970–1990. Social Forces, 76(1), 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neapolitan, J. (1995). Differing theoretical perspectives and cross-national variation in thefts in less-developed nations. International Criminal Justice Review, 5, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neapolitan, J. (1997). Cross-national crime: A research review and sourcebook. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevares, D., Wolfgang, M. E., & Tracy, P. E. (1990). Delinquency in Puerto Rico: The 1970 birth cohort study. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, N. L., & Piquero, A. R. (2006). Democracy and intellectual property: Examining trajectories of software piracy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 104–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41(3), 611–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridemore, W. A. (2008). A methodological addition to the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: A first test of the poverty-homicide thesis. Criminology, 46(1), 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, R. (1977). Class, state, and crime. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quraishi, M. (2005). Muslims and crime: A comparative study. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. (2006). The significance of language, culture, and communication in researching post-Soviet crime and policing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22(2), 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J., Bennett, R. R., & Danner, M. (2008). Economic assistance and crime: A cross-national investigation. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38(4), 1021–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalev, M. (2007). Limits and alternatives to multiple regression in comparative research. In L. Mjoset & T. H. Clausen (Eds.), Capitalisms compared (pp. 261–308). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, L. I. (1981). Crime and modernization: The impact of industrialization and urbanization on crime. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprott, J. B., & Cesaroni, C. (2002). Similarities in homicide trends in the United States and Canada. Homicide Studies, 6(4), 348–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S., Cao, L., & Adamczyk, A. (2007). Crime volume and law and order culture. Justice Quarterly, 24(2), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatel, J. P. (2006). Incorporating socio-historical context into quantitative cross-national criminology. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 30(2), 177–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatel, J. P. (2008a). Regime change and property crime variation in post-communist Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatel, J. P. (2008b). Using mortality data to refine our understanding of homicide patterns in select post-communist countries. Homicide Studies, 12(1), 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatel, J. P. (2009). Correlates of national-level homicide variation in post-communist East-Central Europe. Social Forces, 87(3), 1423–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatel, J. P. (forthcoming). Special issue: New methodological directions for international and comparative criminology. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H. -E. (2004a). Democracy and political corruption: A cross-national comparison. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 41(2), 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H. E. (2004b). State failure, economic failure, and predatory organized crime: A comparative analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(2), 111–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1984). Big structure, large processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R., & Botchkovar, E. V. (2005). Self-control, criminal motivation and deterrence: An investigation using Russian respondents. Criminology, 43(2), 307–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (2005, July). Why are Europe’s crime rates falling? Criminology in Europe: Newsletter of the European Society of Criminology, 4(1), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vagg, J. (1993). Context and linkage: Reflections on comparative research and ‘internationalism’ in criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 33(4), 541–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J. (2008). The world of crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J., & Mayhew, P. (1993). Criminal victimisation in the industrialised world: Key findings of the 1989 and 1992 international crime surveys. In A. A. del Frate, U. Zvekic, & J. van Dijk (Eds.), Understanding crime: Experiences of crime and crime control (pp. 1–50). Rome: UNICRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1983). Historical capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., & Lum, C. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonders, N. A., & Michalowski, R. (2008). Bodies, borders, and sex tourism in a globalized world: A tale of two cities – Amsterdam and Havana. In N. Larsen & R. Smandych (Eds.), Global criminology and criminal justice. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacoubian, G. (2003). Disentangling the definitional confusion between comparative and international criminology. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 3(2), 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E. (2006). The necessity and value of transnational comparative study: Some preaching from a recent convert. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(4), 615–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E. (2007). The great American crime decline. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, USA

    Janet P. Stamatel

Authors
  1. Janet P. Stamatel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany, Washington Ave. 1400, Albany, 12222, USA

    Marvin D. Krohn

  2. School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany, Washington Ave. 1400, Albany, 12222, U.S.A.

    Alan J. Lizotte

  3. School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany, Washington Ave. 1400, Albany, 12222, U.S.A.

    Gina Penly Hall

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stamatel, J.P. (2009). Contributions of Cross-National Research to Criminology at the Beginning of the 21st Century. In: Krohn, M., Lizotte, A., Hall, G. (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0245-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation