Skip to main content

Essential Tensions Surrounding the Concept of Giftedness

  • Chapter
International Handbook on Giftedness

Abstract

The concept of giftedness has a unique history and its meanings need to be deciphered in a proper cultural context. In this chapter, I first discuss “giftedness” as used in natural language as well as scientific discourse. I then provide an overview of the intellectual history of the concept in terms of construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction of “giftedness,” a change from what can be called essentialism to developmentalism. I argue that there are some essential tensions surrounding the concept of giftedness; they involve competing arguments and perspectives on the genesis and development of gifted behaviors and superior achievements. I then elaborate on these tensions and discuss possible ways of resolving and easing these tensions. I end the chapter by suggesting a dialogue between people of differing convictions that would allow us to delve deeper into the intricacies of the issues involved, and reach some degree of consensus as to the conceptual and empirical challenges we are facing.

Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold…

(Borland, 2003, p. 105, quoting Yeats)

Within the group, some individuals may be more traditionalistic, others more iconoclastic, and their contributions may differ accordingly.

(Kuhn, 1977, pp. 227–228)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AAMR (American Association on Mental Retardation) (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1999). Traits and knowledge as determinants of learning and individual differences: Putting it all together. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, traits, and content determinants (pp. 437–460). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Patterns and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2000). World-view entrapment: Moral-ethical implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2003). Barriers to aspiration development and self-fulfillment: Interdisciplinary insights for talent discovery. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2005). Interdisciplinary expansion of conceptual foundations: Insights from beyond our field. Roeper Review, 27, 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angoff, W. H. (1988). The nature-nurture debate, aptitudes, and group differences. American Psychologist, 43, 713–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B. (1998). testing the limits of the ontogenetic sources of talent and excellence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 407–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, J. (1986). Cognitive issues in the development of musically gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 388–413). Cambridge. England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). smart people or smart context? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, R. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attach on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, L. E., & Rosner, R. (1995). Introduction to psychological assessment. In L. E. Beutler & R. Rosner (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (pp. 1–24). New York: The Guilford press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidell, T. R., & Fischer, K. W. (1997). Between nature and nurture: The role human agency in the epigenesis of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 193–242). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. J., & Dworkin, G. (1976). The IQ controversy. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsangue, M. V., & Drew, D. E. (1995). Increasing minority students’ success in calculus. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 11, 501–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H. (1997). The construct of giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3 & 4), 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105–124). New York: Teachers College press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 1–19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, N. (2000). History of theories and measurements of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 16–33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bio-ecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, C. M., & Miller, E. M. (2005). A child-responsive model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 38–51). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “Having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1999). Sources of conceptual change. In E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. Gelman, A. & P. H. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget’s legacy (pp. 293–326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T., Crowe, E., Earle, J., Orland, M., Moon, J., Ross, P., et al. (in press). Identifying and developing exceptional talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Developing a national strategic agenda. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1992). The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development (2 ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. (2003). Cast in six ponds and you’ll reel in something: Looking back on 25 years of research. American Psychologist, 58, 855–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. (1986). A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52, 1051–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colangelom, N., & Davis, G. A. (Eds.) (1997). Handbook of gifted education (2 ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, J. E. (1995). Nature’s imagination: The frontiers of scientific vision. Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two discipline of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, T. L. (2003). Rethinking gifted education: A phenomenological critique of the politics and assumptions of the empirical-analytic mode of inquiry. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 72–79). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenager. New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time, and the development of talent. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 264–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y. (2004). Why the transformation metaphor doesn’t work well: A comment on Gagne’s DMGT model. High Ability Studies, 15, 157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y. (2005). Reductionism versus emergentism: A framework for understanding conceptions of giftedness. Roeper Review, 144–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y., & Coleman, L. J. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on nature, nurture, and development of exceptional competence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 254–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, R. S. (2008). Snowflakes, Living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 114–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Beyond cognitivism: Toward an integrated understanding of intellectual functioning and development. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHaan, R. G., & Havighurst, R. J. (1957). Educating the gifted. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delisle, J. (2003). To be or to do: Is a gifted child born or developed? Roeper Review, 26, 12–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (Eds.) (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education (Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M. (1995). Memory and the individual soul: Against silly reductionism. In J. Cornwell (Ed.), Nature’s imagination: The frontiers of scientific vision (pp. 200–206). Oxford, England: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–703). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2005). Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 287–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1992). TIDE: Talent identification and development in education. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F. (2003). Lewis M. Terman: A pioneer in the development of ability tests. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 155–169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1992). Has there been a paradigm shift in gifted education: Some thoughts on a changing national scene. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline & D. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from 1991 Henry and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 89–94). Uninville, NY: Trillium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1994). Beyond universals in cognitive development (second ed.). Norwood, Nj: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (2003). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 9–33). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W., & Yan, Z. (2002). Darwin’s construction of the theory of evolution: Microdevelopment of explanations of variation and change in species. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Trnasition processes in development and learning (pp. 294–318). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2005). Permission to be gifted: How conceptions of giftedness can change lives. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 80–97). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When it is worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (1985). Gifted and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (1999). My convictions about the nature of abilities, gifts, and talents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 109–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2005a). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 98–119). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2005b). From noncompetence to exceptional talent: Exploring the range of academic achievement within and between grade levels. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts: Education of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J., & Courtright, R. D. (1986). The educational definition of giftedness and its policy implications. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 93–111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds: Portraits of 4 exceptional individuals and an examination of our extraordinariness. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geake, J. (in press). Neuropsychological characteristics of academic and creative giftedness. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition. American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gershwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanism, associations, and pathology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Editorial: Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (2004). Toward the development of a conceptualization of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Cook, C. R., & Morris, P. E. (2005). Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal investigation from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occuring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (in press). Underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education. In R. F. Subotnik & D. Matthews (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on giftedness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, B. A. (2002). Justifying gifted education: A critique of needs claims and a proposal. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenough, W. T. (1976). Enduring brain effects of differential experience and training. In M. R. Rosenzweig & E. L. Bennett (Eds.), Neural mechanisms of learning and memory (pp. 255–278). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinder, R. E. (1985). The gifted in out midst: By their divine deeds, neuroses, and mental test scores we have known them. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: developmental perspectives (pp. 5–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (Rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 247–263). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1998). The social construction of extraordinary selves: Collaboration among unique creative people. In R. C. Friedman & K. B. Rogers (Eds.), Talent in context: Histporical and social perspectives on giftedness (pp. 127–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haensly, P., Reynolds, C. R., & Nash, W. R. (1986). Giftedness: coalescence, context, conflict, and commitment. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 128–148). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haier, R. J. (2001). PET studies of learning and individual differences. In J. L. McClelland & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives (pp. 123–145). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haier, R. J., & Jung, R. E. (2008). Brain imaging studies of intelligence and creativity: What is the picture for education? Roeper Review, 30, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, V. C. (2003). Educational Psychology From 1890 to 1920. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 3–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma & A. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and educaiton in Japan. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzen, T. (in press). Ilk hunting: Demons, worms, geniuses, and the search for the elusive ego-twisted computer hacker talent. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Perleth, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich Model of Giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 147–170). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, N. (this volume). Arbitrariness of definitions of giftedness. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on giftedness. New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Toward a topography of mind: An introduction to domain specificity. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 3–35). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Vintage Books (A Division of Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. New York: World Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1981). Thematic presuppositions and the direction of scientific advance. In A. F. Heath (Ed.), Scientific explanation (pp. 1–27). Oxford, England: Clarendon press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. (1986). Some thoughts about intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition (pp. 91–96). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. J. A. (1997). IQ in question: The truth about intelligence. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. (1999). Intelligence and human resources: Past, present, and future. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, traits, and content determinants (pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. (2006). Expertise, talent, and social encouragement. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 31–38). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iran-Nejad, A., McKeachie, W. J., & Berliner, D. C. (1990). The multisource nature of learning: An introduction. Review of Educational Research, 60, 509–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 151–181). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (2001). Spearman’s hypothesis. In J. M. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap between theory and measurement (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (2002). Surprise, uncertainty, and mental structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, M. L. (in press). The neural plasticity of giftedness. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanevsky, L. (1990). Pursuing qualitative differences in the flexible use of problem-solving strategy by young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanevsky, L. (2000). Dynamic assessment of gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monk,. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. XX). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2004). Bates’ emergentist theory and its relevance to understanding genotype/phenotype relations. In M. Tomasello & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 219–236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. P. (in press). Developmental Science and Giftedness: An Integrated Lifespan Model. In R. F. Subotnik & D. Matthews (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on giftedness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurement. New York: World Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, A. E. (1996). The musical temperament. Oxford, England: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, G. A. (1984). Psychology’s two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 524–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S., & Leary, D. E. (Eds.) (1992). A century of psychology as science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scinentic tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, A. C., & Ericsson, K. A. (1998). The historical development of domains of expertise: Performance standards and innovations in music. In A. Steptoe (Ed.), Genius and mind (pp. 67–94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1976). The abuse of the tests. In N. J. Block & G. Dworkin (Eds.), The IQ controversy (pp. 18–20). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (2001). Issues in the definition and measurement of abilities. In J. M. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap between theory and measurement (pp. 79–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (2005). An aptitude perspective on talent identification: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 333–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (2006). Beliefs about differences between ability and accomplishment: From folk theories to cognitive science. Roeper Review, 29, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F., & Korb, K. A. (2006). Gifted today but not tomorrow? Longitudinal changes in ability and achievement during elementary school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 451–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F., & Rocklin, T. (1995). Current and recurrent issues in the assessment of intelligence and personality. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 447–474). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s (1904) “‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Pshchologist, 55, 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precious youth after 35 years. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Dawis, R. V. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial/organizational psychology (2 ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1–59). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Webbs, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2004). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1970). Wertheimer’s seminar revisited: Problem solving and thinking (Vol. 1). Albany, NY: State University of New York press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupart, J., & Toy, R. (in press). Twice-exceptional: Multiple pathways to success. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, L. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, L. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 164–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2006). Mystery to mastery: Shifting paradigms in gifted education. Roeper Review, 28, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2003). E. L. Thorndike’s enduring contributions to educational psychology. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 113–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). The scientific study of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 437–447). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R. B. (1981). Nature-nurture and the two realms of development: A proposed integration with respect to mental development. Child Development, 52, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWhorter, J. (2003). Doing our own thing: The degradation of language and music and why we should, like, care. New York: Gotham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1992). Multiple intelligences or multilevel intelligence? Selective emphasis on distinctive properties of hierarchy: On Gardner’s Frames of Mind and Sternberg’s Beyond IQ in the context of theory and research on the structure of human abilities. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. I. (1996). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. K. (2005). What the savant syndrome can tell us about the nature and nurture of talent. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J., & Mason, E. J. (1993). Developmental theories and giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönk & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 89–101). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihayi (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). Oxford, England: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelock, M. J. (1996). On the nature of giftedness and talent: Imposing order on chaos. Roeper Review, 19, 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morelock, M. J. (2000). A sociohistorical perspective on exceptionally high-IQ children. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 55–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 24, 882–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhood. Washington, DC: National Academic press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R. (1982). Educational testing: Inferences in relevant subpopulations. Educational Researcher, 11, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, M. W. (2008). Mathematically gifted children: Developmental brain characteristics and their prognosis for well-being. Roeper Review, 30, 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, M. W., Benbow, C. P., & Alexander, J. E. (1995). Sex differences, hemispheric laterality, and associated brain activity in the intellectual gifted. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 415–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overtone, W. F. (1984). World views and their influence on psychological theory and research: Kuhn-Lakatos-Laudan. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 191–226). Orlando, FL: Academic press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papierno, P. B., Ceci, S. J., Makel, M. C., & Williams, W. W. (2005). The nature and nurture of talent: A bioecological perspective on the ontogeny of exceptional abilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 312–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A. H. (1981). The nature of giftedness and talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D., & Ritchhart, R. (2004). When is good thinking. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 351–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., & Burbules, N. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Toward a theory of knowledge. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piechowski, M. M. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285–306). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1994). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensive programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). what makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge. England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for tatal school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 3–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan(Sept.), 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1991). The reform movement and the quiet crisis in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). Schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1998). Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. M. (2005). In defense of a psychometric approach to the definition of academic giftedness: A conservative view from a die-hard liberal. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 280–294). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. M., Zigler, E., & Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Two tails of the normal curve: Similarities and differences in the study of mental retardation and giftedness. American Psychologist, 55, 1413–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. (in press). Multiple giftedness: The case of polymaths. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1994). Creativity and its discontents. In M. P. Shaw & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Creativity and affect (pp. 102–123). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Emergence in psychology: Lessons from the history of non-reductionist science. Human Development, 45, 2–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihayi (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 12–60). Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorittes: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany, NY: State University of New York press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapon-Shevin, M. (1996). Beyond gifted education: Building a shared agenda for school reform. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 194–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior-genetic and socialization theories of intelligence: Truce and reconcilation. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 3–41). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaug, G. (2001). The brain of musicians: A model for functional and structural adaptation. In R. J. Zatorre & I. Peretz (Eds.), The biological foundations of music (Annals of the New York Academy Sciences) (Vol. 930, pp. 281–299). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (2000). Giftedness, expertise, and (exceptional) performance: A developmental perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monk, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 165–177). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (in press). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1990). Is the brain’s mind a computer program? Scientific American, January, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J., R. (2002). Consciousness and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J., R. (2004). Mind: A brief introduction. New York: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavinina, L. (1999). The psychological essence of the child prodigy phenomenon: Sensitive periods and cognitive experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavinina, L. (2004). Explaining high abilities of Nobel laureates. High Ability Studies, 15, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavinina, L. V., & Kholodnaja, M. A. (1996). The cognitive experience as a psychological basis of intellectual giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavinina, L. V., & Seeratan, K. L. (2004). Extracognitive phenomena in the intellectual functioning of gifted, creative, and talented individuals. In L. V. Shavinina & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 73–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M. (1996). Laboratory experimentation on the genesis of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), (pp. 337–345). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, B. M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, B. (this volume). Metacognition in gifted and talented individuals. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, B. M., & Delcourt, M. A. B. (1996). Effective curricular and program practices in gifted education and the interface with general education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P., Greenstein, D., Lerch, J., Clasen, L., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N., et al. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440/30, 676–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Kotovsky, K. (1986). Two levels of giftedness: Shall even the twain meet. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 417–435). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, A. (1988). An Aristotelian resolution of the idiographic versus nomothetic tension. American Psychologist, 43, 425–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence (pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 3, 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. S. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2005). Giftedness and genetics: The emergenic-epigenetic model and its implications. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 270–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1967). The two cultures and a second look. London: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1992). Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational Psychologist, 27, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1994). Aptitude development and talent achievement. In N. Colangelo, S. C. Assouline & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development (Vol. 2, pp. 101–120). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1995). Foreword. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. xi-xv). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soniak, L. A. (2006). Retrospective interviews in the study of expertise and expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 287–301). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent (pp. 225–235). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. (1997). Varieties of intellectual talent. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 93–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H. H., & Carr, M. (2003). Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emergent differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 215–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1995). A thriarchic approach to giftedness (Research Monograph 95126). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999a). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999b). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Cultural concepts of giftedness. Roeper Review, 29, 160–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness: A map of the terrain. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.) (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: Amreican Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F. (2003). A developmental view of giftedness: From being to doing. Roeper Review, 26, 14–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F. (2006). Longitudinal studies: Answering our most important questions of prediction and effectiveness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 343–357). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Distinctions between children’s and adults’ experiences of giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2 ed., pp. 27–42). Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1998). Programs for the gifted: To be or not to be. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1, Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Standford, CA: Stanford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. H. (1916). A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. (1835/2004). Democracy in America. Washintong, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.) (2004). Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabath Bates. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1996). Good teaching for one and all: Does gifted education have an instructional identity? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. S., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the gifted, 19, 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandervert, L. R., & Liu, H. (in press). Neurological bases of individual differences in giftedness. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Károlyi, C., & Winner, E. (2005). Extreme giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 377–394). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Modes of expertise in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 761–787). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive process used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. American Pshchologist, 52, 1070–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Pshchologist, 55, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P. A. (1958). Who are the gifted? . In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Education of the gifted. 57th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A. (2005). The Actiotope Model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 411–436). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monk, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1983). The scientific elite: Nobel laureates’ mutual influences. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 241–252). Oxford, UK: Pergamon press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Yun Dai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dai, D.Y. (2009). Essential Tensions Surrounding the Concept of Giftedness. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics