Abstract
The concept of giftedness has a unique history and its meanings need to be deciphered in a proper cultural context. In this chapter, I first discuss “giftedness” as used in natural language as well as scientific discourse. I then provide an overview of the intellectual history of the concept in terms of construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction of “giftedness,” a change from what can be called essentialism to developmentalism. I argue that there are some essential tensions surrounding the concept of giftedness; they involve competing arguments and perspectives on the genesis and development of gifted behaviors and superior achievements. I then elaborate on these tensions and discuss possible ways of resolving and easing these tensions. I end the chapter by suggesting a dialogue between people of differing convictions that would allow us to delve deeper into the intricacies of the issues involved, and reach some degree of consensus as to the conceptual and empirical challenges we are facing.
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold…
(Borland, 2003, p. 105, quoting Yeats)
Within the group, some individuals may be more traditionalistic, others more iconoclastic, and their contributions may differ accordingly.
(Kuhn, 1977, pp. 227–228)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AAMR (American Association on Mental Retardation) (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.
Ackerman, P. L. (1999). Traits and knowledge as determinants of learning and individual differences: Putting it all together. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, traits, and content determinants (pp. 437–460). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1–37.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Patterns and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ambrose, D. (2000). World-view entrapment: Moral-ethical implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 159–186.
Ambrose, D. (2003). Barriers to aspiration development and self-fulfillment: Interdisciplinary insights for talent discovery. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 282–294.
Ambrose, D. (2005). Interdisciplinary expansion of conceptual foundations: Insights from beyond our field. Roeper Review, 27, 137–143.
Angoff, W. H. (1988). The nature-nurture debate, aptitudes, and group differences. American Psychologist, 43, 713–720.
Baltes, P. B. (1998). testing the limits of the ontogenetic sources of talent and excellence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 407–408.
Bamberger, J. (1986). Cognitive issues in the development of musically gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 388–413). Cambridge. England: Cambridge University press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). smart people or smart context? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165–182.
Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, R. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attach on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Beutler, L. E., & Rosner, R. (1995). Introduction to psychological assessment. In L. E. Beutler & R. Rosner (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (pp. 1–24). New York: The Guilford press.
Bidell, T. R., & Fischer, K. W. (1997). Between nature and nurture: The role human agency in the epigenesis of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 193–242). New York: Cambridge University press.
Block, N. J., & Dworkin, G. (1976). The IQ controversy. New York: Pantheon.
Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
Bonsangue, M. V., & Drew, D. E. (1995). Increasing minority students’ success in calculus. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 11, 501–518.
Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College press.
Borland, J. H. (1997). The construct of giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3 & 4), 6–20.
Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105–124). New York: Teachers College press.
Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 1–19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy press.
Brody, N. (2000). History of theories and measurements of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 16–33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bio-ecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.
Callahan, C. M., & Miller, E. M. (2005). A child-responsive model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 38–51). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “Having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735–750.
Carey, S. (1999). Sources of conceptual change. In E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. Gelman, A. & P. H. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget’s legacy (pp. 293–326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Carroll, T., Crowe, E., Earle, J., Orland, M., Moon, J., Ross, P., et al. (in press). Identifying and developing exceptional talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Developing a national strategic agenda. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.
Case, R. (1992). The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development (2 ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
Ceci, S. J. (2003). Cast in six ponds and you’ll reel in something: Looking back on 25 years of research. American Psychologist, 58, 855–864.
Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. (1986). A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 255–266.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52, 1051–1058.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.
Colangelom, N., & Davis, G. A. (Eds.) (1997). Handbook of gifted education (2 ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock press.
Cornwell, J. E. (1995). Nature’s imagination: The frontiers of scientific vision. Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two discipline of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
Cross, T. L. (2003). Rethinking gifted education: A phenomenological critique of the politics and assumptions of the empirical-analytic mode of inquiry. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 72–79). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenager. New York: Cambridge University press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time, and the development of talent. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 264–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Dai, D. Y. (2004). Why the transformation metaphor doesn’t work well: A comment on Gagne’s DMGT model. High Ability Studies, 15, 157–159.
Dai, D. Y. (2005). Reductionism versus emergentism: A framework for understanding conceptions of giftedness. Roeper Review, 144–151.
Dai, D. Y., & Coleman, L. J. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on nature, nurture, and development of exceptional competence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 254–269.
Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 45–63.
Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, R. S. (2008). Snowflakes, Living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 114–130.
Dai, D. Y., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Beyond cognitivism: Toward an integrated understanding of intellectual functioning and development. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DeHaan, R. G., & Havighurst, R. J. (1957). Educating the gifted. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Delisle, J. (2003). To be or to do: Is a gifted child born or developed? Roeper Review, 26, 12–13.
Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free press.
Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (Eds.) (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education (Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy press.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology press.
Edelman, G. M. (1995). Memory and the individual soul: Against silly reductionism. In J. Cornwell (Ed.), Nature’s imagination: The frontiers of scientific vision (pp. 200–206). Oxford, England: Oxford University press.
Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–703). New York: Cambridge University press.
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University press.
Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2005). Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 287–311.
Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3–55.
Feist, G. J. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1992). TIDE: Talent identification and development in education. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
Feldhusen, J. F. (2003). Lewis M. Terman: A pioneer in the development of ability tests. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 155–169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Basic Books.
Feldman, D. H. (1992). Has there been a paradigm shift in gifted education: Some thoughts on a changing national scene. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline & D. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from 1991 Henry and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 89–94). Uninville, NY: Trillium.
Feldman, D. H. (1994). Beyond universals in cognitive development (second ed.). Norwood, Nj: Ablex.
Feldman, D. H. (2003). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 9–33). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Fischer, K. W., & Yan, Z. (2002). Darwin’s construction of the theory of evolution: Microdevelopment of explanations of variation and change in species. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Trnasition processes in development and learning (pp. 294–318). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Freeman, J. (2005). Permission to be gifted: How conceptions of giftedness can change lives. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 80–97). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When it is worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gagné, F. (1985). Gifted and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103–112.
Gagné, F. (1999). My convictions about the nature of abilities, gifts, and talents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 109–136.
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147.
Gagné, F. (2005a). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 98–119). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Gagné, F. (2005b). From noncompetence to exceptional talent: Exploring the range of academic achievement within and between grade levels. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 139–153.
Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts: Education of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 5–12.
Gallagher, J. J., & Courtright, R. D. (1986). The educational definition of giftedness and its policy implications. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 93–111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds: Portraits of 4 exceptional individuals and an examination of our extraordinariness. New York: Basic Books.
Geake, J. (in press). Neuropsychological characteristics of academic and creative giftedness. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.
Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition. American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.
Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gershwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanism, associations, and pathology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Editorial: Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–24.
Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (2004). Toward the development of a conceptualization of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 121–132.
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Cook, C. R., & Morris, P. E. (2005). Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal investigation from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 172–186.
Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occuring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792–802.
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Graham, S. (in press). Underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education. In R. F. Subotnik & D. Matthews (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on giftedness.
Grant, B. A. (2002). Justifying gifted education: A critique of needs claims and a proposal. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 359–374.
Greenough, W. T. (1976). Enduring brain effects of differential experience and training. In M. R. Rosenzweig & E. L. Bennett (Eds.), Neural mechanisms of learning and memory (pp. 255–278). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Grinder, R. E. (1985). The gifted in out midst: By their divine deeds, neuroses, and mental test scores we have known them. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: developmental perspectives (pp. 5–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. London: Routledge.
Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (Rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 247–263). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Gruber, H. E. (1998). The social construction of extraordinary selves: Collaboration among unique creative people. In R. C. Friedman & K. B. Rogers (Eds.), Talent in context: Histporical and social perspectives on giftedness (pp. 127–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Haensly, P., Reynolds, C. R., & Nash, W. R. (1986). Giftedness: coalescence, context, conflict, and commitment. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 128–148). New York: Cambridge University press.
Haier, R. J. (2001). PET studies of learning and individual differences. In J. L. McClelland & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives (pp. 123–145). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haier, R. J., & Jung, R. E. (2008). Brain imaging studies of intelligence and creativity: What is the picture for education? Roeper Review, 30, 171–180.
Hall, V. C. (2003). Educational Psychology From 1890 to 1920. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 3–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma & A. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and educaiton in Japan. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Heinzen, T. (in press). Ilk hunting: Demons, worms, geniuses, and the search for the elusive ego-twisted computer hacker talent. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.
Heller, K. A., Perleth, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich Model of Giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 147–170). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free press.
Hertzog, N. (this volume). Arbitrariness of definitions of giftedness. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on giftedness. New York: Springer Science.
Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Toward a topography of mind: An introduction to domain specificity. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 3–35). New York: Cambridge University press.
Hofstadter, R. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Vintage Books (A Division of Random House).
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. New York: World Book Company.
Holton, G. (1981). Thematic presuppositions and the direction of scientific advance. In A. F. Heath (Ed.), Scientific explanation (pp. 1–27). Oxford, England: Clarendon press.
Horn, J. (1986). Some thoughts about intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition (pp. 91–96). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Howe, M. J. A. (1997). IQ in question: The truth about intelligence. London: SAGE Publications.
Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–442.
Hunt, E. (1999). Intelligence and human resources: Past, present, and future. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, traits, and content determinants (pp. 3–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hunt, E. (2006). Expertise, talent, and social encouragement. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 31–38). New York: Cambridge University press.
Iran-Nejad, A., McKeachie, W. J., & Berliner, D. C. (1990). The multisource nature of learning: An introduction. Review of Educational Research, 60, 509–515.
Jackson, N. E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 151–181). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Jensen, A. R. (2001). Spearman’s hypothesis. In J. M. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap between theory and measurement (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kagan, J. (2002). Surprise, uncertainty, and mental structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
Kalbfleisch, M. L. (in press). The neural plasticity of giftedness. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.
Kanevsky, L. (1990). Pursuing qualitative differences in the flexible use of problem-solving strategy by young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 115–140.
Kanevsky, L. (2000). Dynamic assessment of gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monk,. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. XX). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2004). Bates’ emergentist theory and its relevance to understanding genotype/phenotype relations. In M. Tomasello & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 219–236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Keating, D. P. (in press). Developmental Science and Giftedness: An Integrated Lifespan Model. In R. F. Subotnik & D. Matthews (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on giftedness.
Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurement. New York: World Book.
Kemp, A. E. (1996). The musical temperament. Oxford, England: Oxford University press.
Kimble, G. A. (1984). Psychology’s two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833–839.
Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 524–543.
Koch, S., & Leary, D. E. (Eds.) (1992). A century of psychology as science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scinentic tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Lehmann, A. C., & Ericsson, K. A. (1998). The historical development of domains of expertise: Performance standards and innovations in music. In A. Steptoe (Ed.), Genius and mind (pp. 67–94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.
Lippmann, W. (1976). The abuse of the tests. In N. J. Block & G. Dworkin (Eds.), The IQ controversy (pp. 18–20). New York: Pantheon.
Lohman, D. F. (2001). Issues in the definition and measurement of abilities. In J. M. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap between theory and measurement (pp. 79–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lohman, D. F. (2005). An aptitude perspective on talent identification: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 333–360.
Lohman, D. F. (2006). Beliefs about differences between ability and accomplishment: From folk theories to cognitive science. Roeper Review, 29, 32–40.
Lohman, D. F., & Korb, K. A. (2006). Gifted today but not tomorrow? Longitudinal changes in ability and achievement during elementary school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 451–484.
Lohman, D. F., & Rocklin, T. (1995). Current and recurrent issues in the assessment of intelligence and personality. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 447–474). New York: Plenum.
Lubinski, D. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s (1904) “‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96–111.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61–66.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Pshchologist, 55, 137–150.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precious youth after 35 years. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345.
Lubinski, D., & Dawis, R. V. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial/organizational psychology (2 ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1–59). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists press.
Lubinski, D., Webbs, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2004). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718–729.
Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1970). Wertheimer’s seminar revisited: Problem solving and thinking (Vol. 1). Albany, NY: State University of New York press.
Lupart, J., & Toy, R. (in press). Twice-exceptional: Multiple pathways to success. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.
Margolin, L. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyer.
Margolin, L. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 164–180.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Matthews, D. J., & Foster, J. F. (2006). Mystery to mastery: Shifting paradigms in gifted education. Roeper Review, 28, 64–69.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). E. L. Thorndike’s enduring contributions to educational psychology. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 113–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The scientific study of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 437–447). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
McCall, R. B. (1981). Nature-nurture and the two realms of development: A proposed integration with respect to mental development. Child Development, 52, 1–12.
McWhorter, J. (2003). Doing our own thing: The degradation of language and music and why we should, like, care. New York: Gotham Books.
Messick, S. (1992). Multiple intelligences or multilevel intelligence? Selective emphasis on distinctive properties of hierarchy: On Gardner’s Frames of Mind and Sternberg’s Beyond IQ in the context of theory and research on the structure of human abilities. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 365–384.
Miller, A. I. (1996). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Miller, L. K. (2005). What the savant syndrome can tell us about the nature and nurture of talent. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 361–373.
Mönks, F. J., & Mason, E. J. (1993). Developmental theories and giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönk & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 89–101). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihayi (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). Oxford, England: Oxford University press.
Morelock, M. J. (1996). On the nature of giftedness and talent: Imposing order on chaos. Roeper Review, 19, 4–12.
Morelock, M. J. (2000). A sociohistorical perspective on exceptionally high-IQ children. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 55–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 24, 882–891.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.
Nelson, C. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhood. Washington, DC: National Academic press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Novick, M. R. (1982). Educational testing: Inferences in relevant subpopulations. Educational Researcher, 11, 4–10.
O’Boyle, M. W. (2008). Mathematically gifted children: Developmental brain characteristics and their prognosis for well-being. Roeper Review, 30, 181–186.
O’Boyle, M. W., Benbow, C. P., & Alexander, J. E. (1995). Sex differences, hemispheric laterality, and associated brain activity in the intellectual gifted. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 415–443.
Overtone, W. F. (1984). World views and their influence on psychological theory and research: Kuhn-Lakatos-Laudan. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 191–226). Orlando, FL: Academic press.
Papierno, P. B., Ceci, S. J., Makel, M. C., & Williams, W. W. (2005). The nature and nurture of talent: A bioecological perspective on the ontogeny of exceptional abilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 312–331.
Passow, A. H. (1981). The nature of giftedness and talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 5–10.
Perkins, D., & Ritchhart, R. (2004). When is good thinking. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 351–384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Phillips, D., & Burbules, N. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Toward a theory of knowledge. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Piechowski, M. M. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285–306). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Piirto, J. (1994). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. New York: Macmillan.
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensive programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning press.
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). what makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge. England: Cambridge University press.
Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for tatal school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning press.
Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 3–54.
Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan(Sept.), 33–58.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1991). The reform movement and the quiet crisis in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 26–35.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). Schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning press.
Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1998). Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 117–139.
Robinson, N. M. (2005). In defense of a psychometric approach to the definition of academic giftedness: A conservative view from a die-hard liberal. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 280–294). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Robinson, N. M., Zigler, E., & Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Two tails of the normal curve: Similarities and differences in the study of mental retardation and giftedness. American Psychologist, 55, 1413–1424.
Root-Bernstein, R. (in press). Multiple giftedness: The case of polymaths. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.
Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Runco, M. A. (1994). Creativity and its discontents. In M. P. Shaw & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Creativity and affect (pp. 102–123). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Emergence in psychology: Lessons from the history of non-reductionist science. Human Development, 45, 2–28.
Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihayi (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 12–60). Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorittes: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany, NY: State University of New York press.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1996). Beyond gifted education: Building a shared agenda for school reform. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 194–214.
Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior-genetic and socialization theories of intelligence: Truce and reconcilation. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 3–41). New York: Cambridge University press.
Schlaug, G. (2001). The brain of musicians: A model for functional and structural adaptation. In R. J. Zatorre & I. Peretz (Eds.), The biological foundations of music (Annals of the New York Academy Sciences) (Vol. 930, pp. 281–299). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Schneider, W. (2000). Giftedness, expertise, and (exceptional) performance: A developmental perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monk, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 165–177). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillam.
Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (in press). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Searle, J. R. (1990). Is the brain’s mind a computer program? Scientific American, January, 26–37.
Searle, J., R. (2002). Consciousness and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Searle, J., R. (2004). Mind: A brief introduction. New York: Oxford University press.
Shavinina, L. (1999). The psychological essence of the child prodigy phenomenon: Sensitive periods and cognitive experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 25–38.
Shavinina, L. (2004). Explaining high abilities of Nobel laureates. High Ability Studies, 15, 243–254.
Shavinina, L. V., & Kholodnaja, M. A. (1996). The cognitive experience as a psychological basis of intellectual giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 3–25.
Shavinina, L. V., & Seeratan, K. L. (2004). Extracognitive phenomena in the intellectual functioning of gifted, creative, and talented individuals. In L. V. Shavinina & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 73–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shiffrin, R. M. (1996). Laboratory experimentation on the genesis of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), (pp. 337–345). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shore, B. M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Shore, B. (this volume). Metacognition in gifted and talented individuals. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.
Shore, B. M., & Delcourt, M. A. B. (1996). Effective curricular and program practices in gifted education and the interface with general education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 138–154.
Shaw, P., Greenstein, D., Lerch, J., Clasen, L., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N., et al. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440/30, 676–679.
Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York: Oxford University press.
Siegler, R. S., & Kotovsky, K. (1986). Two levels of giftedness: Shall even the twain meet. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 417–435). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Silverstein, A. (1988). An Aristotelian resolution of the idiographic versus nomothetic tension. American Psychologist, 43, 425–430.
Simmonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence (pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 3, 435–457.
Simonton, D. S. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.
Simonton, D. K. (2005). Giftedness and genetics: The emergenic-epigenetic model and its implications. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 270–286.
Snow, C. P. (1967). The two cultures and a second look. London: Cambridge University press.
Snow, R. E. (1992). Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational Psychologist, 27, 5–32.
Snow, R. E. (1994). Aptitude development and talent achievement. In N. Colangelo, S. C. Assouline & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development (Vol. 2, pp. 101–120). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology press.
Snow, R. E. (1995). Foreword. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. xi-xv). New York: Plenum.
Soniak, L. A. (2006). Retrospective interviews in the study of expertise and expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 287–301). New York: Cambridge University press.
Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–292.
Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent (pp. 225–235). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University press.
Stanley, J. (1997). Varieties of intellectual talent. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 93–119.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342–357.
Steiner, H. H., & Carr, M. (2003). Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emergent differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 215–246.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1995). A thriarchic approach to giftedness (Research Monograph 95126). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999a). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 359–375.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999b). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Cultural concepts of giftedness. Roeper Review, 29, 160–165.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness: A map of the terrain. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.) (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: Amreican Psychological Association.
Subotnik, R. F. (2003). A developmental view of giftedness: From being to doing. Roeper Review, 26, 14–15.
Subotnik, R. F. (2006). Longitudinal studies: Answering our most important questions of prediction and effectiveness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 379–383.
Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 343–357). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Subotnik, R. F., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Distinctions between children’s and adults’ experiences of giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2 ed., pp. 27–42). Boston, MA.
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1998). Programs for the gifted: To be or not to be. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 3–36.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1, Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Standford, CA: Stanford University press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University press.
Thomson, G. H. (1916). A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 271–281.
Tocqueville, A. (1835/2004). Democracy in America. Washintong, DC: Library of Congress.
Tomasello, M., & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.) (2004). Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabath Bates. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1996). Good teaching for one and all: Does gifted education have an instructional identity? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 155–174.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University press.
Treffinger, D. S., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the gifted, 19, 181–193.
Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14, 623–628.
Vandervert, L. R., & Liu, H. (in press). Neurological bases of individual differences in giftedness. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook on Giftedness. New York: Springer Science.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
von Károlyi, C., & Winner, E. (2005). Extreme giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 377–394). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Modes of expertise in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 761–787). New York: Cambridge University press.
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive process used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children. New York: Basic Books.
Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. American Pshchologist, 52, 1070–1081.
Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Pshchologist, 55, 159–169.
Witty, P. A. (1958). Who are the gifted? . In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Education of the gifted. 57th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Ziegler, A. (2005). The Actiotope Model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2 ed., pp. 411–436). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University press.
Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monk, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Zuckerman, H. (1983). The scientific elite: Nobel laureates’ mutual influences. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (pp. 241–252). Oxford, UK: Pergamon press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dai, D.Y. (2009). Essential Tensions Surrounding the Concept of Giftedness. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6161-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6162-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)