Skip to main content

Quality of Life in Old Age, Inequality and Welfare State Reform: A Comparison Between Norway, Germany, and England

  • Chapter
Quality of Life in Old Age

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 31))

The ageing of societies has strong implications for social security and for social gerontological analysis, while diversity, social inequality, and social justice are traditional core themes of sociology and social policy. Both perspectives are interrelated, as demographic transitions may, on the one hand, be influencing the social status attached to age and cohort membership. On the other hand, current reforms of welfare state systems – partly in reaction to demographic shifts, partly motivated by changing ideologies and ongoing processes of globalization – may have effects on the average welfare situations of people of different ages and cohorts and the distribution of these situations within age groups and cohorts. In the current debate, distributive relations between generations as age groups as well as birth cohorts are discussed as a crucial problem of inequality and justice in modern society. The role of generational equity in this debate is becoming increasingly dominant, both in Germany and in other European societies (Schmähl, 2004). However, the meaning of this term is still unclear and is used quite arbitrarily in current debates. Popular societal discourse in particular is characterised by a muddle of disparate ideas about social justice, distributive norms, and patterns (Tesch-Roemer and Motel-Klingebiel, 2004; Clasen and von Oorschot, 2002). Beyond doubt, there are problems with distribution and equity in most modern welfare states, as demonstrated by contemporary disputes; the assumption is often found that the young could be disadvantaged by the setting up of modern welfare regimes, while the old face enormous gains from the expansion of social security systems (Bommier et al., 2004; Price and Ginn, 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allardt, E. (1975) Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study, Helsinki, Research Group for Comparative Sociology, Research reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. (1983) The Economics of Inequality, Oxford, Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäcker, G. and Koch, A. (2003) ‘Die Jungen als Verlierer? Alterssicherung und Generationengerechtigkeit’, WSI-Mitteilungen, 2, 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolte, K.M., Kappe, D., and Neidhardt, F. (1975) Soziale Ungleichheit, Opladen, Leske and Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommier, A., Lee, R., Miller, T., and Zuber, S. (2004) Who Wins and Who Loses? Public Transfer Accounts for US Generations Born 1850 to 2090, NBER Working Paper No. w10969, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmahn, T. (2000) ‘Zur Entwicklung der Lebensqualität im vereinten Deutschland’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (B40), pp. 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., and Rogers, W.L. (1976) The Quality of American Life, New York, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, J. and van Oorschot, W. (2002) Changing Principles in European Security, Presentation at the 2nd COST A15 Conference ‘Welfare Reforms for the 21st Century’, Oslo, April 5–6, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daatland, S.O. and Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2007) ‘Separating the local and the general in cross-cultural aging research’ in H.-W. Wahl, C. Tesch-Römer, and A. Hoff (eds) New Dynamics in Old Age: Individual, Environmental and Societal Perspectives, Amityville, NY, Baywood, pp. 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daatland, S.O., Herlofson, K., and Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2002) ‘Methoden und Perspektiven international vergleichender Alter(n) sforschung (Perspectives on comparative research on ageing in Europe)’ in A. Motel-Klingebiel and U. Kelle (eds) Perspektiven der empirischen Alter(n) ssoziologie, Opladen, Leske and Budrich, pp. 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2000) ‘Subjective well-being’, American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. and Suh, E.M. (1998) ‘Age and subjective well-being: an international analysis’ in K.W. Schaie and L.M. Powell (eds) Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Vol. 17: Focus on Emotion and Adult Development, New York, Springer, pp. 304–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. and Suh, E.M. (1999) ‘National Differences in Subjective Well-being’ in D. Kahnemann, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (eds) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York, Sage, pp. 434–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., and Smith, H.L. (1999) ‘Subjective Well-being: Three Decades of Progress’, Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A. (1987) ‘The New Age Structure of Poverty in America: Permanent or Transient?’, Population and Development Review, 13, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. (1974) ‘Welfare as a planning goal’, Acta Sociologica, 17, 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, C.L., Linkins, K.W., and Binney, E.A. (1996) ‘The Political Economy of Aging’ in R.H. Binstock and L.K. George (eds) Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, pp. 346–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, T. and Smyth, E. (2004) ‘Do Subjective Indicators Measure Welfare?’, European Societies, 6, 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L., Hamerle, A., and Tutz, G. (eds) (1996) Multivariate statistische Verfahren, Berlin, de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, G. (2003), ‘Human Capital and the Long-Term Effects of Education on Late-Life Inequality’ in S. Crystal and D. Shea (eds) Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, New York, Springer, pp. 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipp, S.-H. (2002) ‘Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität alter und hochbetagter Frauen und Männer’ in Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen (ed.), Expertisen zum vierten Altenbericht der Bundesregierung, Band I, Das hohe Alter – Konzepte, Forschungsfelder, Lebensqualität, Hannover, Vincentz, 315–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. (1995) Basic Econometrics, New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R.M. and Willis. R.J. (2005) ‘Survey Design and Methodology in the Health and Retirement Study and the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study’ in L.J. Waite (ed.) Aging, Health and Public Policy: Demographic and Economic Perspectives, New York, Population Council, pp. 209–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hradil, S. (2004) Die Sozialstruktur Deutschlands im internationalen Vergleich, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U. and Erzberger, C. (1999) ‘Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden. Methodologische Modelle und ihre Bedeutung für die Forschungspraxis’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 51, 509–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, S. and Kelle, U. (eds) (2001) Methodeninnovation in der Lebenslaufforschung. Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Verfahren in der Lebenslauf-und Biographieforschung, Weinheim, Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, M. (1985) ‘Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs – Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 37, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreckel, R. (1992) Politische Soziologie der sozialen Ungleichheit, Frankfurt/M., New York, Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn, K. and Porst, R. (1999) Befragung alter und sehr alter Menschen: Besonderheiten, Schwierigkeiten und methodische Konsequenzen. Ein Literaturbericht. ZUMA Arbeitsbericht 99/03, Mannheim, Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künemund, H. (2000) ‘Datengrundlage und Methoden’ in M. Kohli and H. Künemund (eds) Die zweite Lebenshälfte – Gesellschaftliche Lage und Partizipation im Spiegel des Alters-Survey, Opladen, Leske and Budrich, pp. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberger, U., Gilberg, R., Pötter, U., Little, T.D., and Baltes, P.B. (1996) ‘Stichprobenselektivität und Generalisierbarkeit der Ergebnisse in der Berliner Altersstudie’ in K.U. Mayer and P.B. Baltes (eds) Die Berliner Altersstudie, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, pp. 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, A. and Ogg, J. (eds) (2003) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report (http://www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf. Haifa: University of Haifa).

  • Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., Mehlhausen-Hassoen, D., and Prilutzky, D. (2002) The Research Instruments in the OASIS Project – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity, Haifa, The Center for Research and Study of Aging – The Faculty for Welfare and Health Studies, University of Haifa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2004) ‘Quality of Life and Social Inequality in Old Age’ in S.O. Daatland and S. Biggs (eds) Ageing and Diversity. Multiple Pathways in Later Life, Bristol, Policy Press, pp. 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motel-Klingebiel, A. and Gilberg, R. (2002) ‘Zielsetzungen, Perspektiven und Probleme bei Surveybefragungen mit alten Menschen’ in A. Motel-Klingebiel and U. Kelle (eds), Perspektiven der empirischen Alter(n)ssoziologie, Opladen, Leske and Budrich, pp. 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motel-Klingebiel, A., Hoff, A., Christmann, S., and Hämel, K. (2003) Altersstudien und Studien mit alter(n) swissenschaftlichem Analysepotential. Eine vergleichende Kurzübersicht. Diskussionspapiere, Nr. 39, Berlin, Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2003a) ‘The Role of Family for Quality of Life in Old Age – A Comparative Perspective’ in V.L. Bengtson and A. Lowenstein (eds) Global Aging and Challenges to Families, New York, de Gruyter, pp. 323–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2003b) ‘The Quantitative Survey’ in A. Lowenstein and J. Ogg (eds) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report, Haifa, Haifa University, pp. 63–101 (http://www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf).

  • Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2005) ‘Welfare States Do Not Crowd Out the Family: Evidence for Mixed Responsibility from Comparative Analyses’, Ageing and Society, 25, 863–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noll, H.-H. (1999) Konzepte der Wohlfahrtsentwicklung: Lebensqualität und “neue” Wohlfahrtskonzepte. Project “Towards a European System of Social Reporting and Welfare Measurement”, Subproject “European System of Social Indicators”, EuReporting Working Paper No. 3, Mannheim, ZUMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, H.-H. and Schöb, A. (2002) ‘Lebenqualität im Alter’ in Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen (eds) Das hohe Alter – Konzepte, Forschungsfelder, Lebensqualität. Expertisen zum Vierten Altenbericht der Bundesregierung, Band 1, Hannover, Vincentz, pp. 229–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. and Ray, M. (2003) ‘The Qualitative Phase’ in A. Lowenstein and J. Ogg (eds) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity, Final Report, Haifa, Haifa University, pp. 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S.H. (1984) ‘Children and the Elderly – Divergent Paths for America's Dependents’, Demography, 21, 435–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. and Ginn, J. (2003) ‘Sharing the Crust. Gender, Partnership Status and Inequalities in Pension Accumulation’ in S. Arber, K. Davidson, and J. Ginn (eds) Gender and Ageing, Maidenhead, UK, Open University Press, pp. 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmähl, W. (2004) “Generationengerechtigkeit” als Begründung für eine Strategie “nachhaltiger” Alterssicherung in Deutschland, Bremen, Zentrum für Sozialpolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1973) On Economic Inequality, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Fleeson, W., Geiselmann, B., Settersten, R., and Kunzmann, U. (1996) ‘Wohlbefinden im hohen Alter: Vorhersagen aufgrund objektiver Lebensbedingungen und subjektiver Bewertung’ in P.B. Baltes (ed.) Die Berliner Altersstudie, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, pp. 497–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Fleeson, W., Geiselmann, B., Settersten, R., and Kunzmann, U. (1999) ‘Sources of Well-being in Very Old Age’ in K.U. Mayer and P.B. Baltes (eds) The Berlin Aging Study Aging from 70 to 100, A research project of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, pp. 450–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch-Roemer, C. and Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2004) ‘Gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen des demographischen Wandels’ in A. Kruse and M. Martin (eds) Enzyklopädie der Gerontologie, Bern, Hans Huber, pp. 561–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch-Roemer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2003) ‘Quality of Life’ in A. Lowenstein and J. Ogg (eds) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report, Haifa, Haifa University, pp. 259–284 (http://www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf).

  • Tesch-Römer, C., von Kondratowitz, H.-J., Motel-Klingebiel, A., and Spangler, D. (2000) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Erhebungsdesign und Instrumente des deutschen Survey. Diskussionspapiere Nr. 32. Berlin, Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R.M. (1963) Essays on ‘the Welfare State’, London, Unwin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R.M. (ed.) (1987) The Philosophy of Welfare. Selected Writings of Richard Titmuss, London, Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQoL Group (1994) ‘Development of the WHOQOL: Rationales and Current Status’, International Journal of Mental Health, 23, 24–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQoL Group (1998) ‘Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-Bref Quality of Life Assessment’, in Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1996) WHOQOL-Bref – Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic Version of the Assessment, Field Trial Version, December 1996, Genf, World Health Organization–Programme on Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2007). Quality of Life in Old Age, Inequality and Welfare State Reform: A Comparison Between Norway, Germany, and England. In: Mollenkopf, H., Walker, A. (eds) Quality of Life in Old Age. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5682-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics