Abstract
The proper function of a University in national education is tolerably well understood. At least there is a tolerably general agreement about what a University is not. It is not a place of professional education. Universities are not intended to teach the knowledge required to fit men for some special mode of gaining their livelihood. Their object is not to make skilful lawyers, or physicians, or engineers, but capable and cultivated human beings. It is very right that there should be public facilities for the study of professions. It is well that there should be Schools of Law, and of Medicine, and it would be well if there were schools of engineering, and the industrial arts. The countries which have such institutions are greatly the better for them; and there is something to be said for having them in the same localities, and under the same general superintendence, as the establishments devoted to education properly so called. But these things are no part of what every generation owes to the next, as that on which its civilization and worth will principally depend. They are needed only by a comparatively few, who are under the strongest private inducements to acquire them by their own efforts; and even those few do not require them until after their education, in the ordinary sense, has been completed.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1966 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mill, J.S. (1966). [ON EDUCATION] FROM Inaugural Andress at St. Andrews University. In: Robson, J.M. (eds) A Selection of his Works. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81780-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81780-1_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81782-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81780-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)