Abstract
In this chapter, I will provide evidence for the embodied nature of the concept of anger and some of its metaphors from work in cognitive psychology. I will show that many unrelated languages and cultures do seem to share the generic-level metaphor: the angry person is a pressurized container. This metaphor, I suggest, is motivated by the universal embodiment of anger. The pressurized container metaphor underlies the widespread conception that anger is a force that makes the angry person perform aggressive or violent actions. The actual physiology of anger provides much support for this conceptualization. At the same time, however, there is a considerable amount of variation in the counterparts of anger both cross-culturally and intraculturally. To account for some of this variation, a new, more nuanced view of embodiment will be proposed, where the major idea is that the embodiment of anger consists of multiple components, and cultures may choose which of these components they focus on. I will call this process of selecting one or several such components “experiential focus.” This idea helps us in part explain why, despite universal actual physiology, different cultures can have widely different understandings of their anger-like experiences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barcelona, A. (2001). On the systematic contrastive analysis of conceptual metaphors: Case studies and proposed methodology. In M. Pütz, ed., Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (117–146). Berlin: Mouton.
Bokor, Z. 1997. Body-based constructionism in the conceptualization of anger (C.L.E.A.R. Series, No. 17). Budapest: Department of English, Hamburg University and the Department of American Studies, ELTE.
Csordas, T. (1994). Embodiment and experience. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, 221, 1208–1210.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Geeraerts, D. & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor & R. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–179). Berlin: Gruyter.
Gevaert, C. (2001). Anger in old and middle english: A ‘hot’ topic? Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 89–101.
Gevaert, C. (2005). The anger is heat question: Detecting cultural influence on the conceptualization of anger through diachronic corpus analysis. In N. Delbecque, J. van der Auwera, & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative (pp. 195–208). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R. W. (1992). Why idioms mean what they do? Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 485–506.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 146–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., Bogdonovich, J., Sykes, J., & Barr, D. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 141–154.
Gibbs, R. W. & O’Brian, J. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36, 35–68.
Grady, J. (1997a, b). theories are building revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 267–290.
Grady, J. 1997b. Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
Huang, S. (2002). Tsou is different: A cognitive perspective on language, emotion, and body. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 167–186.
King, B. 1989. The conceptual structure of emotional experience in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: A lexical approach to the study of concepts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kövecses, Z. (1988). The language of love: The Semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kövecses, Z. (2000a). Metaphor and emotion. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2000b). The scope of metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 79–92). Berlin: Mouton.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A practical Introduction. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(7), 37–77.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The Univesity of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., Friesen, W. V., & Ekman, P. (1991). Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age. Psychology and Aging, 6, 28–35.
Levenson, R. W., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). Voluntary facial action generates emotion-specific autonomic nervous system activity. Psychophysiology, 27, 363–384.
Levenson, R. W., Ekman, P., Heider, K., & Friesen, W. V. (1992). Emotion and autonomic nervous system activity in the Minangkabau of West Sumatra. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 972–988.
Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a micronesian atoll and their challenge to western theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Maalej, Z. (2003). The contemporary cognitive theory of metaphor: Arabic data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Manouba, Tunisia.
Matsuki, K. (1995). Metaphors of anger in Japanese. In J. R. Taylor & R. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 137–151). Berlin: Mouton.
Micholajczuk, A. (1998). The metonymic and metaphoric conceptualization of anger in Polish. In A. Athanasiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualization and expression (pp. 153–191). Berlin: Mouton.
Munro, P. 1991. anger is heat: Some data for a cross-linguistic survey. Manuscript, Department of Linguistics, UCLA.
Palmer, G., Bennett, H., & Stacey, L. (1999). Bursting with grief, erupting with shame. A conceptual and grammatical analysis of emotion-tropes in Tagalog. In G. Palmer & D. Occhi (Eds.), Languages of sentiment. Cultural constructions of emotional substrates (pp. 171–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1980). Knowledge and passion. Ilongot notions of self and social life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soriano, C. (2003). Conceptual metaphors and metonymies of anger in Spanish and English. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC). Spain: Logroño.
Stearns, P. (1994). American cool. New York: New York University Press.
Taylor, J. & Mbense, T. (1998). Red dogs and rotten mealies: How Zulus talk about anger. In A. Athanasiadou & E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualization and expression (pp. 191–226). Berlin: Mouton.
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expression of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 223–245.
Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor. A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Cross-Cultural Experience of Anger: A Psycholinguistic Analysis. In: Potegal, M., Stemmler, G., Spielberger, C. (eds) International Handbook of Anger. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89676-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89676-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-89675-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-89676-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)