Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human Ecology Theory

  • Chapter
Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods

Abstract

Human ecology theory is unique in its focus on humans as both biological organisms and social beings in interaction with their environment.1 In this theory the family is considered to be an energy transformation system that is interdependent with its natural physical-biological, human-built, and social-cultural milieu. Emphasis is given to the creation, use, and management of resources for creative adaptation, human development, and sustainability of environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allardt, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a comparative Scandinavian study. Acta Sociologica, 19, 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altaian, I., & Wohlwill, J. F. (1976). Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., & Wohlwill, J. F. (1977). Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Home Economics Association. (1902). Lake Placid conference on home economics: Proceedings of the fourth annual conference. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. P., Bubolz, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1980, Spring/Summer). An ecological approach to study of the family. Marriage and Family Review, 3, 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcus, M. E. (1985, July). Quality of life: Toward conceptual clarification. Paper presented at the First Beatrice Paolucci Symposium, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, E. H. (1968). Interdisciplinary versus ecological approach. Family Process, 7, 202–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulin, A. (1982). The cybernetic laws of social progress. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. (1974). Decision profiles of Mexican-descent families. Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. H. (1923). Geography as human ecology. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 13 (1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. W. (1976). The ecological transition: Cultural anthropology and human Actaptation. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, L. L. (1925). A classification of environments. The American Journal of Sociology, 31, 318–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1987). Home economics. San Francisco: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bews, J. W. (1935). Human ecology. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1985). Quality of children’s family interaction in relation to residential type and household crowding. In J. F. Wohlwill & W. van Vliet (Eds.), Habitats for children: The impact of density (pp. 145–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, R. J. (Ed.) (1986). Human ecology: A gathering of perspectives. College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, R. J., & Jacobs, J. (Eds.) (1988). Human ecology: Research and applications. College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschetti, M. (1984). The older person’s emotional attachment to the physical environment of the residential setting. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (University Microfilms International, No. 84–12, 106).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschetti, M. (1986). Emotional attachment to homes past and present: Continuity of experience and integrity of self in old age. In D. G. Saile (Ed.), Architecture in cultural change: Essays in built form and cultural research (pp. 31–44). Lawrence, KS: School of Architecture and Urban Design, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1987). Family stress. In M. B. Sussman ’ S. K. Steinmetz (Eds), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 695–723). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughey, A. S. (1968). Ecology of populations. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1950). A reconstruction of economics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1985). Human betterment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, V. T. (1976). Valuing the material environment: A conceptual model of object value. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyden, S. (1986). An integrative approach to the study of human ecology. In R. J. Borden (Ed.), Human ecology: A gathering of perspectives (pp. 3—25). College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristor, M. (1990). Individuals, families, and environments. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, C., & Smith, J. (1979). The general systems approach to the family. In W. Burr, R. Hill, R. I. Nye, & I. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Vol. 2. General theories/theoretical orientations (pp. 112–129). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1975). Reality and research in the ecology of human development. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 119, 439–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., Flavin, C., & Postel, S. (1989). A world at risk. In L. R. Brown, C. Flavin, S. Postel, & L. Starke (Eds.), State of the world: A Worldwatch Institute report on progress toward a sustainable society (pp. 3–20). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. M. (1984, June). Needed: A critical science perspective in home economics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Home Economics Association, Anaheim, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. M. (1985). Philosophical studies of home economics in the United States: Our practical-intellectual heritage (Vol. 2). East Lansing, MI: College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home economics: A definition. In Home economics: A definition (pp. 1–62). Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, J. G. (1974). Human ecology: A unifying science? Human Ecology, 2, 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubolz, M. M. (1985). Teaching with a critical science perspective. Journal of Vocational Home Economics Education, 3(1), 78–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, M. S. (1988). Integration in home economics and human ecology. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 12, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubolz, M. M., & Whiren, A. P. (1984). The family of the handicapped: An ecological model for policy and practice. Family Relations, 33, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubolz, M. M., Eicher, J. B., & Sontag, M. S. (1979, Spring). The human ecosystem: A model. Journal of Home Economics, 71(1), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubolz, M. M., Eicher, J. B., Evers, S. J., & Sontag, M. S. (1980). A human ecological approach to quality of life: Conceptual framework and results of a preliminary study. Social Indicators Research, 7, 103–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1925). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 47–62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustrillos, N. (1963). Decision-making styles of selected Mexican homemakers. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1975). The Tao of physics. Berkeley, CA: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982). The turning point. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, W. (1988). Human ecology: The possibility of an aesthetic science. In R. J. Borden & J. Jacobs (Eds), Human ecology: Research and applications (pp. 1–8). College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, W. (1990). House logic: Myth and art in human ecology. In M. Grace & M. Bubolz (Eds.), Decision-making for the future: Interdependence of public and private spheres: Proceedings of the second Beatrice Paolucci Symposium (pp. 60–75). East Lansing, MI: College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, J. S. (1978). A primer on the construction and testing of theories in sociology. Itasca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (1973). Ellen Swallow: The woman who founded ecology. Chicago, IL: Follett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, M. (1988). Between cause and effect: The ecology of program impacts. In A. R. Pence (Ed.), Ecological research with children and families: From concepts to methodology (pp. 143–169). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • College of Home Economics, Michigan State University. (1968). The report of the Committee on the Future of Home Economics. East Lansing, MI: College of Home Economics, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University. (1966). Final report of the president’s committee to study the College of Home Economics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, C. A. (1987). Family life education. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 815–833). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, R. E., & Firebaugh, F. M. (1988). Family resource management: Principles and applications. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, C. (1988). How research can influence practice: The Cornell family matters model. In R. J. Borden & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Human ecology: Research and applications (pp. 154–159). College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B. (1980, April). The deep ecology movement. Natural Resources Journal, 20, 299–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, P. (1962). Reason in society: Five types of decisions and their social conditions. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1965). Human ecology. In Encyclopedia Britannica (Vol. 7, pp. 923–924). Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, D. M. (1962). Students’ wives values as reflected in personal and family activities. Master’s thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, M. (1980). Home economics: Past, present, and future. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. H., Brabble, E. W., Cole, O. J., & Westney, O. E. (1991). Human ecology: Interaction of man with his environments. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H. (1980). Adolescence in historical perspective. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 3–46). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, K. M., & Brommel, B. J. (1982). Family communication: Cohesion and change. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1977). The human ecology of child maltreatment: A conceptual model for research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 721–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P., & Martin, W. T. (1959). Toward a theoretical system of human ecology. Pacific Sociological Review, 2 (1), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladhart, P. M. (1984). Interactions of prices and household characteristics in the determination of residential energy conservation. In B. M. Morrison & W. Kempton (Eds.) Families and energy: Coping with uncertainty, Conference Proceedings (pp. 533—549). East Lansing, MI: Institute for Family and Child Study, College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladhart, P. M., Morrison, B. M., & Zuiches, J. J. (Eds.) (1987). Energy and families: An analysis of life-styles and energy consumption. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goduka, I. N. (1987). Behavioral development of black South African children: An ecological approach. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley, F. B. (1991). Reasoning from ecological knowledge to problem solving. In M. S. Sontag, S. D. Wright, G. L. Young, & M. Grace (Eds.), Human ecology: Strategies for the future (pp. 52–60). Fort Collins, CO: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffore, R. J., & Phenice, L. A. (1988). Causality and the ecology of human development. The Psychological Record, 38, 515–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, I. H., & Crandall, E. (1947). Home management in theory and practice. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Also, editions in 1954, 1963; with M. Knoll, 1973, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, I. H., Crandall, E. W., & Knoll, M. M. (1980). Management for modern families. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, J. (1964). Relationships among certain characteristics of a decision event: Decision procedure, decision context, and decision maker. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrin, D. A., & Wright, S. C. (1988). Precursors to a family ecology: Interrelated threads of ecological thought. Family Science Review, 1, 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1955). A critique of contemporary marriage and family research. Social Forces, 33(3), 268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., & Hansen, D. (1960). The identification of conceptual frameworks used in family study. Marriage and Family Living 22, 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M. J. (1976). Energy conservation: Family values, household practices, and contextual variables. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M. J., & Buehler, C. A. (1983, October). The concept of resources: Definition issues. Paper prepared for the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, National Council on Family Relations Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, N., & Paolucci, B. (1970). The family as an ecosystem. Journal of Home Economics, 62, 315–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, N. (1978). Relationship of husband/wife ecoconsciousness value to direct household energy consumption. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. J. (1988). Female adolescent clothing selection in Korea: A family ecological analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. (1970, November). Values I (Extension Bulletin E-647). East Lansing: Michigan State University Cooperative Extension Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum, F. N. (1961). A study of homemaker’s values as reflected in time used for family and personal activities. Master’s thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilsdonk, A. G. (1983). Human ecology: Meaning and usage. East Lansing, MI: College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, M. (1963). Toward a conceptual framework in home management. Journal of Home Economics, 55, 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H., Edens, T. C., & Cooper, W. (1975). Ecology, engineering and economics. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63, 501–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A. (1975). Unified social science. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (1969). System, structure, and experience. New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (1972). Introduction to systems philosophy. New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston, M. I. (1964, June). Management in the family as social process. In Proceedings, Conceptual Frameworks: Process of Home Management (pp. 52–71). East Lansing: Family Economics-Home Management Section of the American Home Economics Association and Department of Home Management and Child Development of Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, T. (1986). Human ecology as a part of other sciences and as a discipline of its own. In R. J. Borden (Ed.), Human ecology: A gathering of perspectives (pp. 81–93), College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloch, F., & Deacon, R. (1966). Proposed framework for home management. Journal of Home Economics, 58, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, E.A. (1988). Mexican American/Chicano families: Challenging the stereotypes. In H. B. Williams (Ed.), Empowerment through difference: Multicultural awareness in education (pp. 248–269). Home Economics Teacher Education Yearbook 8/1988. Washington, DC: Teacher Education Section, American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. (1975). Quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 2, 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. D. (1926). The scope of human ecology. Publications of the American Sociological Society, 20, 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, J. (1974). The comedy of survival: Studies in literary ecology. New York: Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melson, G. F. (1980). Family and environment: An ecosystem perspective. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklin, M. (1973). Introduction: A framework for the study of human ecology. In M. Micklin (Ed), Population, environment and social organization (pp. 2–19). Hillsdale, IL: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L. W. (1989). Envisioning a sustainable society: Learning our way out. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. K., & Schlater, J. D. (1975). Family-community resource linkage (Research Report 280). East Lansing: Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, E. F. (1990). Ecosystem ecology in biology and anthropology: A critical assessment. In E. F. Moran (Ed.), The ecosystem approach in anthropology: From concept to practice (pp. 3–40). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1985). The family, politics and social theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B. M. (1974). The importance of a balanced perspective: The environments of man. Man-Environment Systems, 4, 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlove, B. S. (1980). Ecological anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 235–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyemade, U. J. (1988). An ecological study of factors affecting behavioral outcomes of adolescents. In R. J. Borden & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Human ecology: Research and applications (pp. 146–153). College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, B. (1962). Concepts, definition and purpose. In Conference on Teaching Home Management: Proceedings. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, B., Hall, O. A., & Axinn, N. (1977). Family decision making: An ecosystem approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1915). The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment. American Journal of Sociology, 20, 577–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1936, July). Human ecology. The American Journal of Sociology, 42, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, D. (1984). Child development: Trends and issues in education, research and legislation. In M. East & J. Thomson (Eds.), Definitive themes in home economics and their impact on families 1909–1984 (pp. 23–33). Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonk, M. (1968, December). Exploring interrelationships in a central-satellite decision complex. Journal of Home Economics, 60, 789–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. (1970). Social decision-making. In The family: Focus on management, Proceedings of a national conference (p. 14). Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsland, D. E. A. (1967). Values underlying family utilization of home furnishings. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, M. P. (1988). An ecological model of the family. Home Economics Forum, 2, 9–11, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig, K. D. (1981). Interpersonal resource exchanges as predictors of quality of marriage and family life. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig, K. D., & Bubolz, M. M. (1983). Perceptual indicators of family well-being. Social Indicators Research, 12(4), 417–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlater, J. D. (1967). The management process and its core concepts. Journal of Home Economics, 59, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlater, J. D. (1969). Investigating values underlying family decisions. (Research Bulletin 23). East Lansing: Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shay, S. (1989). The influences of a community prevention program on parenting beliefs and parental competence. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P. M. (1984). Human ecology and ecology. In M. Micklin & H. M. Choldin (Eds.), Sociological human ecology (pp. 21–49). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, M. S. (1978). Clothing as an indicator of perceived quality of life. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, M. S., & Bubolz, M. M. (1985). Research in progress: Case studies of family Actaptation to changing resources and environments. Agriculture and Human Values, 2, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, M. S., & Bubolz, M. M. (1986). A case study in the conduct of human ecological research: The family farm ecosystem. In R. J. Borden (Ed.), Human ecology: A gathering of perspectives (pp. 221–233). College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, M. S., & Schlater, J. D. (1982). Proximity of clothing to self: Evolution of a concept. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 1, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, M. S., Bubolz, M. M., & Slocum, A. C. (1979). Perceived quality of life of Oakland County families: A preliminary report (Research Report 380). East Lansing: Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, M. S., Wright, S. D., Young, G. L., & Grace, M. (Eds.) (1991). Human ecology: Strategies for the future. Fort Collins, CO: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spedding, C. (Ed.) (1983). Fream’s agriculture (16th ed.). London: The Royal Agricultural Society of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprey, J. (1979). Conflict theory and the study of marriage and the family. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Vol. 2. General theories/theoretical orientations (pp. 130–159). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprey, J. (1988). Current theorizing on the family. An appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(4), 875–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprout, H., & Sprout, M. (1965). The ecological perspective on human affairs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprout, H., & Sprout, M. (1971). Toward a politics of the planet earth. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. (1955). Theory of culture change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidl, R. E. (1970). An ecological approach to the study of family managerial behavior. In The family: Focus on management, Proceedings of a national conference (pp. 22–34). Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, S. (1989). Satisfaction guaranteed: The making of the American mass market. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, D. B., & Harmon, N. P. (1973). Ecology: Selected concepts. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16, 284–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. (1934, July). The ecological basis of anthropology. Ecology, 15, 223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengström, E. (1985). Human ecology–A new discipline? Humanekologiska Skrifter, 4, Göteborgs Universitet, Institutionen för fredsforskning och humanekologi, Göteborg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., & Bubolz, M. M. (1986, November). Energy in the family system: Meaning, usage and assumptions. Paper prepared for the Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, National Council on Family Relations Annual Meeting, Dearborn, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. J. (1988). Home economics and feminism: The Hestian synthesis. Charlottetown: University of Prince Edward Island Home Economics Publishing Collective.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thome, B. (1982). Feminist rethinking of the family: An overview. In B. Thome & M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 1–24). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaines, E. (1990, Winter). Philosophical orientations and home economics: An introduction. Canadian Journal of Home Economics, 40(1), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet, W. (1985). The role of housing type, household density, and neighborhood density in peer interaction and social adjustment. In J. F. Wohlwill & W. van Vliet (Eds.), Habitats for children: The impact of density (pp. 165–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, A. P. (1983). Progressive contextualization: Methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology, 11(3), 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, C. (1984). Themes in home management. In M. East & J. Thomson (Eds.), Definitive themes in home economics and their impact on families 1909–1984 (pp. 35–44). Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visvader, J. (1986). Philosophy and human ecology. In R. J. Borden (Ed.), Human ecology: A gathering of perspectives (pp. 117–127). College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. J., & Thompson, L. (1984). Feminism and family studies. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 545–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. J., Kees Martin, S. S., & Thompson, L. (1988). Feminist programs for families. Family Relations, 37, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westney, O., Brabble, E., & Edwards, C. (1988). Human ecology: Concepts and perspectives. In R. J. Borden & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Human ecology: Research and applications (pp. 129–137). College Park, MD: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, C. C. (1979). Acceptability of housing alternatives by families. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilden, A. (1972). System and structure. London: Tavistock Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, M. (1981). Direct and indirect conservation of fossil fuel energy: The influence of financial and philosophical motivators and available human resources. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk, R. R. (1990). Household ecology: Decision making and resource flows. In E. F. Moran (Ed.), The ecosystem approach in anthropology: From concept to practice (pp. 323–356). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissler, C. (1929). An introduction to social anthropology. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, J. F. (1985). Residential density as a variable in child-development research. In J. Wohlwill & W. van Vliet (Eds.), Habitats for children: The impact of density (pp. 17–37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. F., & Barker, R. G. (1950). Methods in psychological ecology. Lawrence: Department of Psychology, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. D., & Herrin, D. A. (1988). Ecology, human ecology, and the study of the family: Part 2. Family Science Review, 1, 253–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. L. (Ed.) (1983). Origins of human ecology. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. L. (1989). A conceptual framework for an interdisciplinary human ecology. Acta Oecologiae Hominis, International Monographs in Human Ecology (No. 1). Lund, Sweden: Human Ecology Division, Department of History, University of Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. L. (1991). Minor heresies in human ecology. In M. S. Sontag, S. D. Wright, G. L. Young, & M. Grace (Eds.), Human ecology: Strategies for the future (pp. 11–25). Fort Collins, CO: Society for Human Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family and Child Ecology, College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824

    Margaret M. Bubolz

  2. Department of Human Environment and Design, College of Human Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824

    M. Suzanne Sontag

Authors
  1. Margaret M. Bubolz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Suzanne Sontag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    Pauline Boss  & William J. Doherty  & 

  2. Department of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA

    Ralph LaRossa

  3. School of Family Studies and Human Services, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA

    Walter R. Schumm

  4. Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA

    Suzanne K. Steinmetz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bubolz, M.M., Sontag, M.S. (2009). Human Ecology Theory. In: Boss, P., Doherty, W.J., LaRossa, R., Schumm, W.R., Steinmetz, S.K. (eds) Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44264-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85764-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation