Skip to main content

Family Theories and Methods

A Contextual Approach

  • Chapter
Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods

Abstract

This introductory chapter to the Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods deals with the sociocultural and historical contexts of family theories and methods as they have developed in the twentieth century. It also addresses the issues of what theory is, what are the bases for evaluating family theory, what are the goals of family theory, and how family scholars have shifted their understandings of the nature of family theory and the research methods used to validate it. As reflected in the quotes above from philosopher Alasdaire MacIntyre and sociologists Mirra Komarovsky and Willard Waller, these questions are simultaneously about social science theory; methodology; application in the realms of education, clinical practice, and public policy; and the social and moral dilemmas of our time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldous, J. (1978). Family careers: Developmental change in families. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1987). Twenty lectures: Sociological theory since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1988). The new theoretical movement. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 77–101). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. (1978). The search for applicable theories of black family life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 21, 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baritz, L. (1990). The good life: The meaning of success for the American middle class. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M., & McIntosh, M. (1982). The anti-social family. London: NLB/Verso Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and committment in American life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1991). The good society. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, I. V., Burr, W. R., Bahr, K. S., & Herrin, D. A. (1989). The family realm: Theoretical contributions for understanding its uniqueness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 805–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. G. (1987). Family stress. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family (pp. 695–723). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M., Marsh, P., & Brenner, M. (Eds.) (1978). The social context of methods. New York: St. Martins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L., Martin, T. C., & Sweet, J. A. (1991). The impact of family bckground and early marital factors on marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. The Family, 7, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1927). Statistics and case studies as methods in sociological research. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W., & Cottrell, L. S. (1939). Predicting success or failure in marriage. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. C. (1988). Paths into American culture: Psychology medicine, and morals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, S. (1990). Social movements of the 1960s. Boston: Twayne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R. (1973). Theory construction and the sociology of the family. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R., & Leigh, G. K. (1983). Famology: A new discipline. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (Eds.) (1979a). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (eds.) (1979b). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N. F. (1988). Twentieth-century culture: Modernism to deconstruction. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafetz, J. S. (1978). A primer on the construction and testing of theories in sociology. Itasca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. T. (1964). Development of the family field of study. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 3–22). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, S. (1989). Postmodernist culture. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, W. V. (1980). The family and religion: Exploring a changing relationship. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J. (1986). Quanta, quarks, and families: Implications of quantum physics for family research. Family Process, 25, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J. (1991). Postmodern family therapy. The Family Therapy Networker, 15, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J., & Boss, P. G. (1991). Values and ethics in family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (Vol. II, pp. 606–637). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J., & Campbell, T. L. (1988). Families and health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, E. M. (1990, June). Family development: A personal perspective. Presentation at the Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. N. (1989). The family realm: A future paradigm or failed nostalgia? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 816–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, E. F. (1939). The Negro family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowldge. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. (1972). Sociological theory construction. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, J. C. (1991). The cynical society: The culture of politics and the politics of culture in American life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldner, V. (1988). Generation and gender: Normative and covert hierarchies. Family Process, 27, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, E. R., & Groves, G. H. (1947). The contemporary American family. Chicago: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. (1972). Techniques and problems of theory construction in sociology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1–14). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1978). A feminist approach to family therapy. Family Process, 17, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1986). The problem of gender in family therapy theory. Family Process, 26, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. M., & Berlin, D. (1982, October). Meta theoretical considerations for family theory: An apology to families. Paper presented at the NCFR Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1966). Contemporary developments in family theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 28, 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., & Hansen, D. (1960). The identification of conceptual frameworks utilized in family study. Marriage and Family Living, 22, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., & Rodgers, R. H. (1964). The developmental approach. In H. T. Christensen (Ed), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 171–211). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1962). Sentiments and activities. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. L. (1981). A social history of American family sociology, 1865–1940. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurich, J. A. (1989). The family realm: Expanding its parameters. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 819–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. M. (1973). Criteria for evaluting theories. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. M. (1980). Commentary on the iinkages between conceptual frameworks and theory development in sociology. Sociological Quarterly, 21, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. F., Calvert, G. P., Garland, T. N., & Poloma, M. M. (1969). Pilgrim’s progress I: Recent developments in family theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 677–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M., Johnston, J. R., & Tschann, J. M. (1991). The long shadow of marital conflict: A model of children’s postdivorce adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M., & Waller, W. (1945). Studies of the family. American Journal of Sociology, 50, 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R., & Wolf, J. H. (1985). On qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 531–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R., Bennett, L. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1981). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larzelere, R. E., & Klein, D. M. (1987). Methodology. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family (pp. 125–155). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1977). Haven in a heartless world: The family besieged. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavee, Y., & Dollahite, D. C. (1991). The linkage between theory and research in family science. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1976). A social psychological perspective on divorce. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1, pp. 268–294). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, D. (1982). Gregory Bateson: The legacy of a scientist. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown: A study of contemporary American culture. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1937). Middletown in transition: A study in cultural conflicts. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciano, T. D. (1987). Families and religion. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 285–315). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., & Fisher, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in human sciences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, E. T. (1988). Homeward bound: American families in the cold war era. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo, H. (1978). Factors related to stability in upwardly mobile black families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 761–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLain, R., & Weigert, A. (1979). Toward a phenomenological sociology of family: A programmatic essay. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 160–205). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menaghan, E. G. (1989). Escaping from the family realm: Reasons to resist claims for its uniqueness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 822–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S., & Kellogg, S. (1988). Domestic revolutions: A social history of American family life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, F. I. (1979). Choice, exchange, and the family. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (pp. 1–41). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, F. I., & Berardo, F. M. (Eds.) (1966). Emerging conceptual frameworks in family analysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1989). Circumplex model: Systemic assessment and treatment of families. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M. W. (1987). Radical-critical theories. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 103–124). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, B., Hall, O. A., & Axinn, N. (1977). Family decision making: An ecosystem approach. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. J. (1956). Economy and society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. W., & Rollins, B. C. (1987). Parent-child socialization. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.). Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 471–507). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. R. (1964). The structural-functional approach. In H. T. Christensen (Ed), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 51–124). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, D. (1981). The family’s construction of reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, R. H. (1973). Family interaction and transaction: The developmental approach. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, H. (1980). Are conceptual frameworks necessary for theory building? The case of family sociology. Sociological Quarterly, 21, 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. L., & Rosenberg, E. S. (1987). In our times: America since World War II (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. G. (1987). The realistic therapist: Modesty and relativism in therapy and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1972). Sexual bargaining: Power politics in the American marriage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. E., & Costanzo, P. R. (1982). Theories of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprey, J. (1969). The family as a system in conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 699–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprey, J. (1990). Theoretical practice in family studies. In J. Sprey (Ed.), Fashioning family theory: New approaches (pp. 9–33). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, R. (1971). Towards a sociology of the black family: A theoretical and methodological assessment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, P. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (1989). The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, W. I. (1984). Culture as history: The transformation of American society in the twentieth century. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, M. B., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1987). Handbook of marriage and the family. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. D., Polonko, K. A., & Scanzoni, J. (1987). Demography of the family. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 3–36). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1938). Psychological factors in marital happiness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. L., & Wilcox, J. E. (1987). The rise of family theory: A historical and critical analysis. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 81–102). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. L., & Roghaar, H. B. (1990). Postpositivist theorizing: The case of religion and the family. In Sprey, J. (Ed.), Fashioning family theory: New approaches (pp. 136–170). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. L., Kleber, J. E., & Galligan, R. (1980, October). Through the glass darkly: Family theory, the new philosophy of science and hermeneutics. Paper presented at the NCFR Theory and Research Methodology Workshop, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918–1920). The Polish peasant in Europe and America (Vols. 1–5). Boston, MA: Badger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (1989, November). Marital responsibility: Contextual and relational morality. Paper presented at the NCFR Theory Construction and Research Methodology Workshop, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thome, B., & Yalom, M. (Eds.) (1982). Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1986). The structure of sociological theory (4th ed). Chicago: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, L.Th. (1981). Early family sociology in Europe: Parallels to the United States. In R. L. Howard, A social history of American family sociology (pp. 95–139). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannoy, D. (1991). Social differentiation, contemporary marriage, and human development. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega, W. A. (1990). Hispanic families in the 1980s: A decade of research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1015–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (Ed.) (1984). The invented reality. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, C. C., & Frampton, M. E. (1935). Family and society: A study of the sociology of reconstruction. New York: Van Norstrand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doherty, W.J., Boss, P.G., LaRossa, R., Schumm, W.R., Steinmetz, S.K. (2009). Family Theories and Methods. In: Boss, P., Doherty, W.J., LaRossa, R., Schumm, W.R., Steinmetz, S.K. (eds) Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44264-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85764-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics