Abstract
The thesis of this chapter is that the Health in All Policy innovation process is only complete when national intentions have linked up with, and made a change to, ‘practice’ at the local level. Much is known about the way bureaucratic hierarchies attempt, but often fail, to make this happen, but much less so in relation to networks. For the latter, evidence is presented showing their superiority when policies are complex, requiring cross organizational action, and when the potential effort directed to their achievement is fragmented.
In the case of HiAP both situations apply. However, in the dialog between 26 of 32 countries meeting in Finland in 2006 to consider obstacles and driving forces in relation to HiAP, it is remarkable that no consideration is given to the possibility that the very nature of organizations, and what they represent to those who work in them, might be a root cause of the many years of relative failure to bring about multisectoral, interorganizational action.
Directed specifically toward improvement of interorganizational relationships, the chapter focuses on arrangements that can be put in place to overcome barriers to integrative action. These may be structural, procedural, financial, professional, or relate to status and legitimacy.
Ultimately, the aim is to achieve virtual reorganization, with the design of bringing together interorganizational effort to achieve health and social gain targets. This is Policy Innovation Number 1.
The journey to this end involves an understanding of what will:
-
bring a diverse range of organizations to the table to form networks – using resources better, gaining wider skills, sharing risk and uncertainty, adaptive efficiencies, and legal or regulatory demands, and
-
the crucial elements involved in network development if success is to be assured – the right choice of network type, relating to complexity of the problem, the specialist knowledge required, size, etc; an understanding of the organizational cultures of members; communication arrangements; and good governance.
This is Policy Innovation Number 2.
The chapter also introduces the ‘neutral white space’ concept – a zone between participating organizations where they can meet in an unfettered, less guarded way. Coordination of activity is key; and a particular role is described which involves ‘attracting’, ‘guiding,’ and brokering white space and virtual reorganizations’ activities, that is working with networks in the space and assisting in mainstreaming the results of their creative thinking. This is Policy Innovation Number 3.
The evidential base which enabled the above approach to be developed was tested in an extensive 4-year action research project in South Wales, UK. This is reported here in case study form as a self-standing item at the end of the chapter. Policies which might provide a better quality of life and health for older people were developed through coordinated networks concerned with crime, transport, income and medication, and implemented by the partner organizations working in a virtually reorganized way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Morgan, G., 1996. Images of Organisations. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Council of the European Union, 2006. Council Conclusions on Health in All Policies (HiAP). Brussels: Council of the European Union.
Ståhl, T., Lahtinen, E., & Wismar, M., 2006. Report of the Policy Dialogues. The Finnish EU Presidency Projects in “Europe for Health and Wealth 2006”. Unpublished report. Helsinki.
World Health European Office, 1984. HFA by the year 2000: European Regional Targets. Copenhagen: WHO.
Ståhl, T., & Lahtinen, E., 2006. Towards closer intersectoral cooperation: The preparation of the Finnish national health report. In T. Ståhl et al. (eds) Health in All Policies, Prospects and Potentials, pp. 169–191. Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
Sihto, M., Ollila, E., & Koivusalo, M., 2006. Principles and challenges of Health in All Policies. In T. Ståhl et al. (ed.) Health in All Policies, Prospects and Potentials, pp. 3–20. Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
Ritsatakis, A., & Järvisalo, J., 2006. Opportunities and challenges for including health components in the policy-making process. In T. Ståhl et al. (eds) Health in All Policies, Prospects and Potentials, pp. 145–168. Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M., 1991. Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health. Stockholm: Institute of Futures Studies.
Swedish National Institute of Public Health, 2003. The National Public Health Strategy for Sweden in Brief. Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
Agren, G., 2003. Sweden’s New Public Health Policy: National Public Health Objectives for Sweden. Sandviken, Sweden: Sandvikens tryckeri.
Lager, A., Guldbrandsson, K., & Fossum, B., 2007. The chance of Sweden’s public health targets making a difference. Health Policy, 80, 413–421.
Kickbush, I., 2003. The contribution of the World Health Organisation to a new public health and health promotion. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 383–388.
Nilsson Carlsson, I., 2005. In Proceedings of the Interfaculty Working Group on Health Disparities. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Public Health Now, 18th March.
Fine, M., Pancharatnam, K., & Thomson, C., 2005. Coordinated and Integrated Humans Service Delivery Models. SPRC Report 1/05, University of New South Wales, Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.
Integrated Care Network, 2004. Change Agent Report 1-12 www.integratedcarenetwork.co.uk
Woods, K., 2001. Development of integrated health care models. International Journals of Integrated Care. 1. April-June. http://www.ijic.org/archive.html
Hardy, B., Mur-Veemanu, I., Steenbergen, M., & Wistow, G., 1999. Inter-agency services in England and the Netherlands. A comparative study of integrated care development and delivery. Health Policy, 48, 87–105.
Jones, C., Hesterly, W.S., & Borgatti, S.P., 1997. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.
Burt, R., 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warner, M., 2006. Synergy. In M. Marinker (ed.) Constructive Conversations About Health, Policy and Values. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
Tillich, P., 1926. Religiöse Verwicklichung. Berlin: Furche Verlag.
Tillich, P., 1936. The Interpretation of History. Part one trans. By N.A. Rasetski; part two, three and four trans. By Elsa L Talmey. New York and London: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Aldrich, H., & Whetten, D.A., 1981. Organization-sets, action sets and networks: Making the most of simplicity. In P.C. Nystrom & W.H. Starbuck (eds) Handbook of Organizational Design. Volume 1: Adapting Organizations to their Environments, pp. 385–408. New York: Oxford University Press.
Milward, H.B., & Provan, K.G., 1998. Measuring network structure. Public Administration, 76(2), 387–407.
Powell, W.W., 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. In L.L. Cummings & B. Straw (eds) Research in Organizational Behaviour, pp. 295–336. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
Baum, J.A.C., & Oliver, C., 1991. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187–218.
Grandori, A., & Soda, G., 1995. Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16(2), 183–214.
Ebers, M., 1997. The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oliver, C., 1990. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15, 241–265.
Osborn, R.N., & Hagedoorn, J., 1997. The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 261–278.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J., 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C., 1992. Causes of failure in network organizations. California Management Review, 34, 53–72.
Ibarra, H., 1992. Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Elements toward a network theory of getting things done. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, pp. 165–188. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Warner, M., 2000. Health gain investment for the 21st century: Developments in health for all in Wales. In A. Ritsatakis et al. (eds) Exploring Health Policy Development in Europe, 86, 236–270. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation.
Moreno, J.L., 1934. Who Shall Survive? Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychotherapy, and Sociodrama. Washington DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co.
Kaluzny, A.D., Zukerman H.S., Ricketts III T.C., & Walton G.B., (eds) 1995. Partners for the Dance: Forming Strategic Alliances in Health Care. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Health Administration Press.
Curran, C.R., Kuhn, K.W., Miller, N., Skalla, A., & Thurman, R.D., 1999. Shaping an Integrated Delivery Network: Home Care’s Role in Improving Service, Outcomes and Profitability. Chicago, Ilinois: Health Administration Press.
Hage, J., & Alter, C. A., 1997. Typology of interorganizational relationships and networks, in contemporary capitalism In J.R. Hollingsworth & R. Boyer (eds) The Embeddedness of Institutions, pp. 94–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bazolli, G.J., Shortell, S.M., Chan, C., Dubbs, N.L., & Kralovec, P., 1999. A taxonomy of health networks and systems: Bringing order out of chaos. Health Services Research, 33(6), 683–1717.
Shortell, S.M., Bazolli, G.J., Dubbs, N.L., & Kralovec, P., 2000. Classifying health networks and systems: Managerial and policy implications. Health Care Management Review, 25(4), 9–18.
Alter, C., & Hage, J., 1993. Organizations Working Together. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Rhodes, R.A.W., 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Flynn, R., Williams, G., & Pickard, S., 1996. Markets and Networks: Contracting in Community Health Services. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Mintzberg, H., 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Powell, W.W., 1996. Trust-based forms of governance In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (eds) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp. 51–67. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M., 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal Sociology, 104(5), 1439–1493.
Bryant, J., 2002. It’s all threats and promises: Understanding the pressures of effective collaboration, In D. Purdue & M. Stewart (eds) Understanding Collaboration, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Multi-organisational Partnerships and Co-operative Strategy, pp. 11–17. Bristol: UWE.
Leavitt, H.J., 1965. Applied organisational change in industry: structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In J.G. March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations, pp. 1144–1170. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Scott, W., 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Smith, C., Norton, B., & Ellis, D., 1992. Leavitt’s Diamond and the flatter library: A case study in organizational change. Library Management, 13(5), 18–22.
Homburg, C., Workman, J.P. Jr., & Jensen, O., 2000. Fundamental changes in marketing organization: The movement toward a customer-focused organizational structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 459–478.
Duarte, D.L., & Snyder, N.T., 1999. Mastering Virtual Teams. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
Ovretveit, J., 1993. Coordinating Community Care. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Nohria, N., & Eccles, R.G., 1992. Face-to-face: Making network organisations work, In N. Nohria & R.G. Eccles (eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, pp. 288–308. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Parsons, T., 1960. Structure and Process in Modern Societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
DSRU, 1998. Towards a common language. Background Paper 2. Devon: Darlington Social Research Unit.
Stern, L., 1996. Relationships, networks and the three cs. In D. Iacobucci (ed.) Networks in Marketing, pp. 3–7. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hedberg, B., Dahlgren, G., Hansson, J., & Olve, N.G., 1997. Virtual Organizations and Beyond. New York: Wiley.
Coase, R.H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago Press.
Lawrence, P.F., & Lorsch, J.W., 1967. Differentiation and integration in complex organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–47.
Davis, M., 1983. Boundary and Space: An Introduction to the Work of D.W. Winnicott. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Mathiesen, T., 1971. Across the Boundaries of Organizations. Berkeley, CA: The Glendessary Press, Inc.
Sarason, S., & Lorentz, E., 1998. Crossing Boundaries: Collaboration, Coordination and the Redefinition of Resources. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Poxton, R., (ed.) 1999. Working Across the Boundaries: Experiences of Primary Health and Social Care Partnerships in Practice. London: King’s Fund.
Aldrich, H., & Reiss, A., Jr. 1971. Police officers as boundary personnel. In H. Hahn (ed.) Police in Urban Society, pp.193–208. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D., 1977. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 77(2), 217–230.
Williams, P., 2001. Sieves not shells: Profiling boundary spanners. In: D. Purdue & M. Stewart (eds) Understanding Collaboration: International Perspectives on Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 75–82. Bristol: Faculty of the Built Environment, UWE.
Williams, P., 2002. The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration. 80(1), 103–124.
Trist, E., 1985. Intervention strategies for interorganizational domains. In R. Tannenbaum, N Marguiles, F Massarik and associates. Human Systems Development: New Perspectives on People and Organizations, pp.167–197. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lorenzoni, G., & Baden-Fuller, C., 1995. Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partners. California Management Review, 37(3), 146–163.
Human, S., & Provan, K., 2000. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firms multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 327–365.
Emerick, R., Graham, D., & Kovanda, B., 1999. Multiskilling: Health Unit Coordination for the Health Care Provider. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.
March, J., & Simon, H. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
Thompson, J., 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bolland, J.M., & Wilson, J.V., 1994. Three faces of integrative coordination: A model of interorganizational relations in community-based health and human services. Health Services Research, 29 (3), 341–357.
Malone, T., & Crowston, K., 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), March, 87–119.
Stinchcombe, A.L., & Heimer, C.A., 1985. Organization Theory and Project Management. Oxford: Norwegian University Press.
Gould, N., (ed.) 2006. Multi Organisational Partnerships, Alliances and Networks, Engagement. Proceedings of the 12th MOPAN International Conference, 2005. Devon: Short Run Press.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C.K., 1994. Competing for the Future. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Bradach, J., & Eccles, R., 1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97–118.
Warner, M., 1997. Re-designing Health Services: Reducing the Zone of Delusion. London: Nuffield Trust.
Warner, M.M., 1999. Virtual reorganisation by design: An approach to progressing the public’s health in Wales using networks In WHO 4th European Consultation on Future Trends: The Health 21 Framework, London, 14th December.
Warner, M.M., 2002. A European view In M. Marinker (ed.) Health Targets in Europe: Polity, Progress and Promise, pp.165–180. London: BMJ Books.
Warner, M., & Gould, N., 2003. Integrated care networks and quality of life: Linking theory and practice. International Journal of Integrated Care. 3 October 9th Edition 2003, ISSN 1586
Warner, M., & Gould, N., 2003. Community health alliances through integrated networks (CHAIN): Reporting project progress in South Wales with reference to the UK National Service Framework for Older People. In M. Garcia-Barbela, D. Groen (eds.) International Conference on New Research and Developments in Integrated Care. Barcelona: IJIC, 21–22 February.
Warner, M., & Gould, N., 2004. Virtual co-ordination: Re-framing systems’ management In Integrated Care Conference. Birmingham: IJIC, 20–21 February.
Van Gennep, A., 1960. The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Turner, V., & Turner, E., 1978. Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture – Anthropological Perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gould, R., & Fernandez, R., 1989. Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89–126.
Fernandez, R., & Gould, R., 1994. A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), May, 1455–1491.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warner, M., Gould, N. (2009). Integrating Health in All Policies at the Local Level: Using Network Governance to Create ‘Virtual Reorganization by Design’. In: Kickbusch, I. (eds) Policy Innovation for Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79876-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79876-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79875-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79876-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)