Skip to main content

Abstract

Based on the 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), this study identifies consumer segments left out in the adoption of e-banking technologies, such as ATMs, debit cards, direct deposits, and direct payments. While variations exist for each different type of e-banking technology, e-banking laggards tend to be older, less educated, divorced or separated, and less affluent. We also compare data from the 2004 SCF with data from 1995 to examine whether significant changes exist in the determinants of e-banking adoption over this 10-year period and report how the demographics of e-banking adoption have changed over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables Management Science, 15(5), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellis, M. (2003). Inventors of the modern computer. Retrieved January 10, 2007, from http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bl_ERMA_Computer.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielski, L. (2007). Electronic bill pay usage heats up. ABA Banking Journal, 99(2), 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucks, B. K., Kennickell, A. B., & Moore, B. M. (2006). Recent changes in U.S. family finances: Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 92, A1–A38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, L. F., Gerlach, J., & Harper, M. D. (2005). Perceived risk and e-banking services: An analysis from the perspective of the consumer. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(2), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002). An attitudinal model of technology-based self service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 184–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, E. (1999). Provision of electronic banking in the UK and the republic of Ireland. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(2), 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M. D., & Gentry, J. W. (1983). Characteristics of adopters and non-adopters of home computers. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drennan, B. (2003). E-banking history. Retrieved January 10, 2007, from http://www.drennangroup.com/history.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. R. (1985). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of E-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, M. C., & Zeithaml, V. (1985). The elderly consumer and adoption of technologies. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howcroft, B., Hamilton, R., & Hewer, P. (2002). Consumer attitude and the usage and adoption of home-based banking in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(3), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardhena, C., & Foley, P. (2000). Changes in the banking sector—The case of internet banking in the UK. Internet Research, 10(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karjaluoto, H., Mattila, M., & Pento, T. (2002). Factors underlying attitude formation towards online banking in Finland. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(6), 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A. (1983). Development, adoption and diffusion of new industrial products. European Journal of Marketing, 17(3), 31–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennickell, A. B., & Kwast, M. L. (1997). Who uses electronic banking? Results from the 1995 Survey of Consumer Finances. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Economic Association, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., Yilmazer, T., & Widdows, R. (2005). The determinants of consumers’ adoption of Internet banking. Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee, E. (2006) Families’ use of payment instruments during a decade of change in the U.S. payment system. Working Paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodinsky, J. M., Hogarth, J. M., & Hilgert, M. A. (2004). The adoption of electronic banking technologies by US consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(4), 238–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassar, W. M., Manolis, C., & Lassar, S. S. (2005). The relationship between consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and online banking adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2), 176–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., & Lee, J. (2000). Haven’t adopted electronic financial services yet? The acceptance and diffusion of electronic banking technologies. Financial Counseling and Planning, 11(1), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., Lee, J., & Schumann, D. W. (2002). The influence of communication source and mode on consumer adoption of technological innovations. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., & Littler, D. (1997). The adoption of direct banking services. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(8), 791–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattilia, M., Karjaluoto, H., & Pento, T. (2003). Internet banking adoption among mature customers: Early majority or laggards? Journal of Services Marketing, 17(5), 514–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. C. (2005). Will online bill payment spell the demise of paper checks? Payment Cards Center Discussion Paper 05-08, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L. J. (2006). Changes in the use of electronic means of payment: 1995–2004. Business Review, Q2, 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1965). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathye, M. (1999). Adoption of internet banking by Australian consumers: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(7), 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, J. (2002). Effect of consumer characteristics on the use of payment instruments. New England Economic Review, 3, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube, P. M. (1988). The influence of selected factors on the frequency of atm usage. Journal of Retail Banking, 10(1), 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. H., Craig-Lees, M., Hecker, R., & Francis, H. (2002). Technology-enabled service delivery: An investigation of reasons affecting customer adoption and rejection. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A., & Gilly, M. C. (1987). Characteristics affecting the acceptance of retailing technologies: A comparison of elderly and non-elderly consumers. Journal of Retailing, 63(1), 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinman, J. (2005). Debit or credit? Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, J., Cho, J.E., Abdul-Rahman, F. (2008). E-banking. In: Xiao, J.J. (eds) Handbook of Consumer Finance Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75734-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics