Skip to main content

Behavioral Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Neuropsychology of Attention

Abstract

Behaviorism emerged in response to the early schools of psychology that had put a premium on the analysis of consciousness and subjective experience. With roots in the principles of associationism, objectivism, and logical positivism, behaviorism maintained that psychology should be an empirical science, its focus restricted to measurable behavior. This could be best accomplished by studying the characteristics of association formation between external events (stimuli) and the resulting responses. The term conditioning became synonymous with the process by which an associative linkage was established and learning occurred. By characterizing the relationship between the responses of the animal and the stimuli in its environment, learning theorists specified building blocks for more complex behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Donahoe, J., & Palmer, D. C. (1989). The interpretation of complex behavior: Some reactions to parallel distributed processing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Donahoe, J., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donahoe, J., & Burgos, J. E. (1999). Timing without a timer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 257–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Attention. In E. L. Thorndike (Ed.), The principles of teaching based on psychology (pp. 105–109). New York: AG Seiler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence; experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Human learning. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlov, I. P. (1960). Conditioned reflexes; an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sechenov, I. M., & Shaternikov, M. N. (1968). Selected works. Amsterdam: E.J. Bonset.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rescorla, R. A. (1967). Inhibition of delay in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64(1), 114–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rescorla, R. A. (1967). Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review, 74(1), 71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67(4), 504–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Establishment of a positive reinforcer through contrast with shock. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67(2), 260–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rescorla, R. A., & Solomon, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74(3), 151–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rescorla, R. A. (1999). Associative changes in elements and compounds when the other is reinforced. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 25(2), 247–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rescorla, R. A. (2000). Associative changes in excitors and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 26(4), 428–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mandel, I. J., & Bridger, W. H. (1973). Is there classical conditioning without cognitive expectancy? Psychophysiology, 10(1), 87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Honig, W. K. (1969). Attention factors governing the slope of the generalization gradient. In R. M. Gilbert & N. S. Sutherland (Eds.), Animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mackintosh, N. J. (1965). The effect of attention on the slope of generalization gradients. British Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Solomon, P. R., & Moore, J. W. (1975). Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89(10), 1192–1203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spence, K. W., Kendler, H. H., & Spence, J. T. (1971). Essays in neobehaviorism; a memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Glanzman, D. L., Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1972). Stimulus generalization of habituation in spinal interneurons. Physiology & Behavior, 8(1), 155–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rescorla, R. A. (2006). Stimulus generalization of excitation and inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brandon, S. E., Vogel, E. H., & Wagner, A. R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 110(1–2), 67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Siddle, D. A. T., & Spinks, J. A. (1979). Orienting response and information processing: Some theoretical and empirical problems. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Obeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Siddle, D. (1983). Orienting and habituation: Perspectives in human research. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Exploratory behavior: I. Orienting responses. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.), Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Watson, J. B. (1925). Behaviorism. New York: The People’s Institute Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Spence, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 57, 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lawrence, D. H. (1949). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: I. Transfer between discriminations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 770–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeaman, D., & House, B. J. (1963). The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency (pp. 159–223). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Logan, F. A. (1972). Essentials of a theory of discrimination learning. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Tenets of neurobehaviorism (pp. 265–284). New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pearce, J. M., Esber, G. R., George, D. N., & Haselgrove, M. (2008). The nature of discrimination learning in pigeons. Learning & Behavior, 36(3), 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nevin, J. A., Davison, M., Odum, A. L., & Shahan, T. A. (2007). A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88(2), 285–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Denny, M. R., Wells, R. H., & Maatsch, J. L. (1957). Resistance to extinction as a function of the discrimination habit established during fixed-ratio reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain (second printing ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Konorski, J. (1968). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. New York: Hafner Publications (Facsim. Reprint of the 1948 ed).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Konorski, J., Dickinson, A., & Boakes, R. A. (1979). Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum (distributed by Halsted Press Division of Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain; an interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Konorski, J. (1973). The role of prefrontal control in programming of motor behaviour. In J. D. Maser (ed.), Efferent organization and integrative behaviour. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Konorski, J. (1972). Physiological mechanisms of internal inhibition. In R. A. Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.), Inhibition and learning. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bernheim, J. W., & Williams, D. R. (1967). Time-dependent contrast effects in a multiple schedule of food reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10(3), 243–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Krane, R. V., & Ison, J. R. (1971). Positive induction in differential instrumental conditioning: Effect of the interstimulus interval. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 75(1), 129–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Senf, G. M., & Miller, N. E. (1967). Evidence for positive induction in discrimination learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64(1), 121–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hull, C. L. (1970). Mathematico deductive theory of rote learning: A study in scientific methodology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Spence, K. W., & Taylor, J. A. (1953). The relation of conditioned response strength to anxiety in normal, neurotic, and psychotic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Spence, K. W. (1956). Behavior theory and conditioning (1956). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Denny, M. R. (1946). The role of secondary reinforcement in a partial reinforcement learning situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 373–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Amsel, A. (1989). Behaviorism, neobehaviorism, and cognitivism in learning theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Konorski, J. (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kendler, H. H., & Kendler, T. S. (1966). Selective attention versus mediation: Some comments on Mackintosh’s analysis of two-stage models of discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 66(4), 282–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kendler, T. S. (1971). Continuity theory and cue-dominance. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Tenets of neurobehaviorism (pp. 237–264). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kendler, T. S., Basden, B. H., & Bruckner, J. B. (1970). Dimensional dominance and continuity theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(2), 309–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Grusec, T. (1968). The peak shift in stimulus generalization: Equivalent effects of errors and noncontingent shock. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(3), 239–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Terrace, H. S. (1963). Errorless discrimination learning in the pigeon: Effects of chlorpromazine and impiramine. Science (New York, N.Y.), 140, 318–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Terrace, H. S. (1973). Conditioned inhibition in successive discrimination learning. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 35(1), 39–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Terrace, H. S. (1985). On the nature of animal thinking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 9(4), 643–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Honig, W. K. (1970). Attention and the modulation of stimulus control. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Terrace, H. S., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Bignami, G., & Rosic, N. (1972). Acquisition and performance effects of scopolamine and of treatment withdrawal in avoidance situations. Physiology & Behavior, 8(6), 1127–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hoffman, H. S., & Barrett, J. (1971). Overt activity during conditioned suppression: A search for punishment artifacts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16(3), 343–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Weiss, S. J. (1972). Stimulus compounding in free-operant and classical conditioning. A review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 78(3), 189–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Abramson, C. I., & Aquino, I. S. (2002). Behavioral studies of learning in the Africanized honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 59(1–2), 68–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Bonardi, C. (1989). Inhibitory discriminative control is specific to both the response and the reinforcer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(3), 225–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Carr, A. F. (1974). Latent inhibition and overshadowing in conditioned emotional response conditioning with rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86(4), 718–723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lombas, A. S., Kearns, D. N., & Weiss, S. J. (2008). A comparison of the effects of discriminative and Pavlovian inhibitors and excitors on instrumental responding. Behavioural Processes, 78(1), 53–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Schachtman, T. R., Kasprow, W. J., Chee, M. A., & Miller, R. R. (1985). Blocking but not conditioned inhibition results when an added stimulus is reinforced in compound with multiple pretrained stimuli. The American Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 283–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Weiss, S. J., Thomas, D. A., & Weissman, R. D. (1996). Combining operant-baseline-derived conditioned excitors and inhibitors from the same and different incentive classes: An investigation of appetitive-aversive interactions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 357–381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zimmer-Hart, C. L., & Rescorla, R. A. (1974). Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86(5), 837–845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Amsel, A. (1962). Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: Some recent history and a theoretical extension. Psychological Review, 69(4), 306–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Amsel, A. (1992). Frustration theory–many years later. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 396–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Amsel, A., & Chen, J. S. (1976). Ontogeny of persistence: Immediate and long-term persistence in rats varying in training age between 17 and 65 days. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 90(8), 808–820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Amsel, A., Rashotte, M. E., & Mackinnon, J. R. (1966). Partial reinforcement effects within subject and between subjects. Psychological Monographs, 80(20), 1–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Amsel, A., & Surridge, C. T. (1964). The influence of magnitude of reward on the aversive properties of anticipatory frustration. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18, 321–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Surridge, C. T., & Amsel, A. (1966). Acquisition and extinction under single alternation and random partial-reinforcement conditions with a 24-hour intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 361–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Lovejoy, E. (1965). An attention theory of discrimination learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 342–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Mackintosh, N. J. (1965). Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 124–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Trabasso, T., & Bower, G. H. (1968). Attention in learning theory and research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Trabasso, T., & Bower, G. H. (1975). Attention in learning: Theory and research. Huntington, NY: R. E. Krieger.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kendler, H. H., & Kendler, T. S. (1962). Vertical and horizontal processes in problem solving. Psychological Review, 69, 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Colombo, J., Mitchell, D. W., Coldren, J. T., & Atwater, J. D. (1990). Discrimination learning during the first year: Stimulus and positional cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(1), 98–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Burr, D., Banks, M. S., & Morrone, M. C. (2009). Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration. Experimental Brain Research, 198(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Koppen, C., & Spence, C. (2007). Seeing the light: Exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect. Experimental Brain Research, 180(4), 737–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Fort, A., Delpuech, C., Pernier, J., & Giard, M. H. (2002). Early auditory-visual interactions in human cortex during nonredundant target identification. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(1), 20–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Wagner, A. R., Mazur, J. E., Donegan, N. H., & Pfautz, P. L. (1980). Evaluation of blocking and conditioned inhibition to a CS signaling a decrease in US intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 6(4), 376–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bordnick, P. S., Copp, H. L., Traylor, A., Graap, K. M., Carter, B. L., Walton, A., et al. (2009). Reactivity to cannabis cues in virtual reality environments. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(2), 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Waters, A. J., Carter, B. L., Robinson, J. D., Wetter, D. W., Lam, C. Y., Kerst, W., et al. (2009). Attentional bias is associated with incentive-related physiological and subjective measures. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(4), 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Sargent, J. D., Morgenstern, M., Isensee, B., & Hanewinkel, R. (2009). Movie smoking and urge to smoke among adult smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(9), 1042–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Attwood, A. S., O’Sullivan, H., Leonards, U., Mackintosh, B., & Munafo, M. R. (2008). Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 103(11), 1875–1882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Field, M., & Duka, T. (2004). Cue reactivity in smokers: The effects of perceived cigarette availability and gender. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 78(3), 647–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Shadel, W. G., Niaura, R., Abrams, D. B., Goldstein, M. G., Rohsenow, D. J., Sirota, A. D., et al. (1998). Scripted imagery manipulations and smoking cue reactivity in a clinical sample of self-quitters. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6(2), 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Niaura, R., Shadel, W. G., Abrams, D. B., Monti, P. M., Rohsenow, D. J., & Sirota, A. (1998). Individual differences in cue reactivity among smokers trying to quit: Effects of gender and cue type. Addictive Behaviors, 23(2), 209–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Juliano, L. M., & Brandon, T. H. (1998). Reactivity to instructed smoking availability and environmental cues: Evidence with urge and reaction time. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6(1), 45–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Yanover, T., & Sacco, W. P. (2008). Eating beyond satiety and body mass index. Eating and Weight Disorders, 13(3), 119–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Nijs, I. M., Franken, I. H., & Muris, P. (2008). Food cue-elicited brain potentials in obese and healthy-weight individuals. Eating Behaviors, 9(4), 462–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Ferriday, D., & Brunstrom, J. M. (2008). How does food-cue exposure lead to larger meal sizes? The British Journal of Nutrition, 100(6), 1325–1332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Hill, A. J. (2007). The psychology of food craving. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 66(2), 277–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Carter, F. A., McIntosh, V. V., Joyce, P. R., & Bulik, C. M. (2001). Abstention during cue reactivity assessment is associated with better outcome among women with bulimia nervosa. Eating Behaviors, 2(3), 273–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Overduin, J., Jansen, A., & Eilkes, H. (1997). Cue reactivity to food- and body-related stimuli in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Addictive Behaviors, 22(3), 395–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Lee, J. H., Lim, Y., Wiederhold, B. K., & Graham, S. J. (2005). A functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) study of cue-induced smoking craving in virtual environments. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(3), 195–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Chiamulera, C. (2005). Cue reactivity in nicotine and tobacco dependence: A “multiple-action” model of nicotine as a primary reinforcement and as an enhancer of the effects of smoking-associated stimuli. Brain Research, 48(1), 74–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Waters, A. J., Shiffman, S., Bradley, B. P., & Mogg, K. (2003). Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 98(10), 1409–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Spence, K. W. (1960). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. In K. W. Spence (Ed.), Behavior theory and learning: Selected papers (pp. 269–291). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Spence, K. W. (1978). Behavior theory and conditioning. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Grice, G. R. (1971). A threshold model for drive. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Tenets of neurobehaviorism. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Taylor, J. A. (1951). The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(2), 81–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, R.A. (2014). Behavioral Perspectives. In: The Neuropsychology of Attention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72639-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72639-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72638-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72639-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics