Skip to main content

Cognitive Psychology of Attention: Foundations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Neuropsychology of Attention

Abstract

Formal scientific inquiry into the processes underlying attention largely coincided with the emergence of the nascent field of cognitive psychology in the middle of the last century. As cognitive scientists developed models to explain how humans process sensory information, it was necessary to select certain salient stimuli, while ignoring stimuli with less informational value, thereby reducing the amount of input that has to be handled at any given moment in time. This selection process was conceptualized as “attentional” and considered to be an essential aspect of cognition. In this chapter, some of the major cognitive theories and experimental approaches to the study of attention will be discussed. The chapter begins with a review of information-processing theory and early cognitive studies of attention that focused on sensory selection. This will be followed by discussion of other early cognitive theories and approaches. In the next chapter we will review developments in the cognitive psychology of attention that have occurred since the first edition of this book (post-1990) and current status of the cognitive psychology of attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Posner, M. I. (1986). Chronometric explorations of the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirst, W., Spelke, E. S., Reaves, C. C., Caharack, G., & Neisser, U. (1980). Dividing attention without alternation or automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 98–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 975–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fairbanks, G., Guttman, N., & Miron, M. S. (1957). Effects of time compression upon the comprehension of ­connected speech. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 22(1), 10–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Treisman, A. M. (1964). Selective attention in man. British Medical Bulletin, 20, 12–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76(3), 282–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moray, N. (1970). Attention: Selective processes in vision and learning. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moray, N. (1967). Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychologica, 27, 84–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Triesman, A. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Review of Experimental Psychology, 12(4), 242–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Treisman, A. M. (1966). Our limited attention. Advancement of Science, 22(104), 600–611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: H. Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature, 290, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention: The VIIth Sir Frederic Bartlett lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Posner, M. I., Peterson, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627–1631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Desimone, R. (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 353(1373), 1245–1255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wurtz, R. H., Goldberg, M. E., & Robinson, D. L. (1982). Brain mechanisms of visual attention. Scientific American, 246(6), 124–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Swets, J. (1984). Mathematical models of attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 183–242). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Swets, J. A. (1964). Signal detection and recognition by human observers; contemporary readings. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Swets, J. A., Green, D. M., Getty, D. J., & Swets, J. B. (1978). Signal detection and identification at successive stages of observation. Perception & Psychophysics, 23(4), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tanner, W., & Norman, R. Z. (1954). The human use of information: Signal detection for the case of unknown signal parameters. New York, NY: Institute of Radio Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Green, D. M. (1958). Detection of multiple component signals in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 904–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Loeb, M., & Alluisi, E. A. (1984). Theories of vigilance. In J. S. Warm (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 179–205). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Parasuraman, R., & Davies, D. R. (1984). Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Titchener, E. B. (1908). The laws of attention: I. In E. B. Titchener (Ed.), Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention (pp. 209–247). New York: MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Titchener, E. B. (1908). The laws of attention: II. In E. B. Titchener (Ed.), Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention (pp. 251–282). New York: MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Pribram, K., & McGuinness, D. (1975). Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. Psychological Review, 82(2), 116–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Squires, K., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K., & Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142–1146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schvaneveldt, R., & Meyer, D. E. (1973). Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attentional and performance IV. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford, Oxfordshire: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Posner, M. I. (2004). Cognitive neuroscience of attention. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kirsner, K., & Smith, M. C. (1974). Modality effects in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 2, 637–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372–1388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sanders, R., Gonzalez, E. G., Murphy, M. D., Liddle, C. L., & Vitina, J. R. (1987). Frequency of occurrence and the criteria for automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 595–605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T., & Shriffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. P. D. R. Davies (Ed.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1–27). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. A. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hirst, W., & Kalmar, D. (1987). Characterizing attentional resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117, 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wickens, C. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hirst, W. (1986). The psychology of attention. In J. E. L. W. Hirst (Ed.), Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 105–141). New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1980). Task difficulty, resources, and dual-task performance. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 297–315). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kinchla, R. A. (1980). The measurement of attention. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. VIII, pp. 213–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Navon, D. (1985). Attention division or attention sharing? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 133–146). Hinsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kinsbourne, M. (1970). A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 95, 143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kinsbourne, M. (1982). Hemispheric specialization and the growth of human understanding. American Psychologist, 37, 411–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Spelke, E., Hirst, W. C., & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Shaffer, L. H. (1975). Multiple attention in continuous verbal tasks. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 157–167). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Shaffer, W. O., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1972). Rehearsal and storage of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92(2), 292–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Treisman, A., & Geffen, G. (1967). Selective attention: Perception or response? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19(1), 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, R.A. (2014). Cognitive Psychology of Attention: Foundations. In: The Neuropsychology of Attention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72639-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72639-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72638-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72639-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics