Skip to main content

Public and Private Space in Urban Areas: House, Neighborhood, and City

  • Chapter
Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

From time immemorial, societies have fashioned informal and formal public and private spaces in their settlements. Public space is “a place accessible to all citizens, for their use and enjoyment” (Jackson, 1974). In contrast, a private place is open to those permitted by law or custom. As it becomes more clear in the following essay, the meaning of the words “accessible,” “use,” and “enjoyment” is very broad (Francis, 1989). The demarcation of public and private areas, although seemingly sharp is sometimes vague. In addition, different societies at various times in history have placed more or less attention on the creation and maintenance of public space. Public space is important to urban sociologists who recognize that it serves as a setting for community activities or public life, for example, parades, meetings, and informal gatherings. They also observe how it can be a magnet for community organization; for example, groups unite in designing, developing, maintaining, and protecting public spaces. And finally, they see that it can provide a unique identifiable reference that reinforces a sense of belonging to a community; for example, New Yorkers identify with Times Square, Rockefeller Center, Fifth Avenue, and Central Park or Philadelphians resonate to Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Love Park, Fairmount Park, and the steps of the Museum of Art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Community Gardening Association. (1998). National community garden survey 1996. Retrieved December 2, 2005 from http://www.communitygarden.org/Cgsurvey96part.1pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the Street, Decency, Violence and Moral Life in the Inner City. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2004). Cosmopolitan canopy. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 595 (September): 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, E. (1974). Design of Cities. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (1974). Urban Design as Public Policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (1995). The Fractured Metropolis. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (2003). Redesigning Cities, Principles, Practice, Implementation. Chicago: Planners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, C. and Hoffman, C. (1997). Frederick Law Olmsted, Writings on Public Parks, Parkways and Park Systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, E. (1978). Woman-made America: The case of early public housing policy. Journal of the American Institute of Planners Association, 43(2):130–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, E. (1980). Radburn and the American planning movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46:424–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, E. (1996). Planning in a world city, New York and its communities. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:442–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, E. (2002). Five generations of garden city planning. In: From the Garden City to Green Cities, ed. K. Parsons and D. Schuyler, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 171–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, E. (2005a). US planning culture under pressure. In: Comparative Planning Cultures, ed. B. Sanyal, London: Routledge, pp. 331–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, E. (2005b). Who Lives Downtown? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, E. and Snyder, M. (1997). Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campo, D. (2004). On the waterfront, vernacular recreation at Brooklyn eastern terminal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Networked Society (2d edn.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congress for New Urbanism. (1993). Charter of New Urbanism. Retrieved December 2, 2005 from http://www.cnu.org/aboutcnu/index.cfm?formaction=charter&CFID= 12786481&CFTOKEN=47147268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., and Speck, J. (2000). Suburban Nation, the Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Nasser, H. (2002). Gated communities more popular and not just for the rich. USA Today. Retrieved December 2, 2005 from http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-12-15-gated-usa_x.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faga, B. (2006). Designing Public Consensus. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, R. (1982). Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community & Everyday Life. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M. (1989). Control as a dimension of public-space quality. In: Public Places and Spaces, ed. I. Altman and E. Zube, New York: Plenum, pp. 147–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1962). The Urban Villagers Race and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1967). The Levitowners, Life and Politics in a New Suburban Community. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, A. (N.D.) Parks, Recreation and Open Space; A Twenty-First Century Agenda. Chicago: American Planning Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, A. (2002). The American City What Works What Doesn’t. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (1996). Public Space and Public Life. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. and Gemzøe, L. (1996) Public Spaces—Public Life. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Guerillas. (2006). Who We Are. Retrieved December 2, 2005 from: http://www.greenguerillas.org/whoweare.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiss, T. (1990). The Experience of Place, a New Way of Looking at and Dealing with Our Radically Changing Cities and Countryside. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houstoun, L. (2004). BIDS Business Improvement Districts. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, L. (2001). Business improvement districts, untold stories and unsubstantiated impacts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, A. (2004). Downtown America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (1974). American public space. The Public Interest, 74(Winter):52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. (1985). The Crabgrass Frontier. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. (1993). Great Streets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayden, J. (2000). Privately-Owned Public Space. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelbaugh, D. (2002). Repairing the American Metropolis Common Place Revisited. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinenberg, E. (2002). Heatwave, a Social Autopsy of Disaster. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunstler, J. (1993). The Geography of Nowhere, the Rise and Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O. (1961). The Children of Sanchez. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. (2000). On the Plaza the Politics of Public Space and Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. (2003a). Behind the Gates, Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. and Lawrence-Zuniga, D. (2003). The Anthology of Space and Place: Locating Culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1981). Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, C. (1998). People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (2001). How Cities Work. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1972). City and the Self. New York: Time-Life Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia, Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1961). The City in History. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader R. (2003). Selling Out, Our Public Space, Universal Services Under Assault. Retrieved December 2, 2005. CommonDreams.org. Retrieved from http://www.commondreams.org;views/03/0810-07.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J. (1998). The Evaluative Image of the City. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1972). Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, M. and Bowman, A. (2000). Vacant Land in Cities, an Urban Resource. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. (1929). Housing for the Machine Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project for Public Places (1984). Managing Downtown Spaces. Chicago: Planners Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone, the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schukoske, J. (2000). Community development through gardening, state and local policies transforming urban open space. Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 3:351–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1976). The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C. (1951). Towards New Towns for America. Liverpool, UK: University of Liverpool Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonnies, F. (1957). Community and Society. (C. Loomis, Tran.) East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2004). American housing survey for the United States. Retrieved Decmber 2, 2005 from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/ahs.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergara, C. (1995). The New American Ghetto. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernez-Moudon, A. (1991). Public Streets for Public Use. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. (1956). The Organization Man. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H. (1988). City: Rediscovering the Center. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. and Kelling, G. (1982). Broken windows, the police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3):29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (2005). When big is too big, even in LA. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved December 2, 2005 from http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0830/003s01-uspo.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel, J. (1980). Inquiry by Design. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, P. (1959). Town and Square from the Agora to the Village Green. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Birch, E.L. (2008). Public and Private Space in Urban Areas: House, Neighborhood, and City. In: Cnaan, R.A., Milofsky, C. (eds) Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32933-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics