Skip to main content

Auditory masking is often observed in everyday life: While walking on a street a passing truck can disrupt our conversation. Likewise, one would not want a cell phone to ring in quiet parts of a classical concert but it might not even be heard in a loud rock-concert. Components of one sound interact with components of another sound similar in frequency and time and render them inaudible. This is referred to as masking. Partial masking can also occur: Components are not inaudible, but their loudness is reduced (c.f. Chapter 18). This chapter first introduces the frequent case of masking by one tone on another for simultaneous and successive presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 629.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D.S. Brungart, B.D. Simpson, C.J. Darwin, T.L. Arbogast, and G. Kidd. Across-ear interference from parametrically degraded synthetic speech signals in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 118(5):292–304, 2005.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Buus. Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 78(6):1958–1965, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Dau, D. Püschel, and A. Kohlrausch. A quantitative model of the “effective” signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99(6):3615–3622, 1996.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. N.I. Durlach, C.R. Mason, G. Kidd, T.L. Arbogast, H.S. Colburn, and B.G. Shinn-Cunningham. Note on informational masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 113(6):2984–2987, 2003.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J.P. Egan and H.W. Hake. On the masking patterns of a simple auditory stimulus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 22(5):622–630, 1950.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Fastl. Temporal masking effects: III. Pure tone masker. Acustica, 43:282–294, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Fletcher. Auditory patterns. Rev. Mod. Phys., 12:47–65, 1940.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B.R. Glasberg and B.C.J. Moore. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear. Res., 47(5):103–138, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.M. Green. Profile Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.D. Greenwood. Auditory masking and the critical band. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 33(4):484–502, 1961.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.W. Hall III, J.H. Grose, and L. Mendoza. Across-channel processes in masking. In B.C.J. Moore, editor, Hearing, Handbook of perception and cognition, pages 243–265. Academic Press, San Diego, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.A. Lopez-Poveda and R. Meddis. A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110(6):3107–3118, 2001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. B.C.J. Moore. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Academic Press, San Diego, 5th edition, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.J. Oxenham and B.C.J. Moore. Modeling the additivity of nonsimultaneous masking. Hear. Res., 80:105–118, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.J. Oxenham and C.J. Plack. Effects of masker frequency and duration in forward masking: further evidence for the influence of peripheral nonlinearity. Hear. Res., 150:258–266, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R.D. Patterson, J. Holdsworth, I. Nimmo-Smith, and P. Rice. The auditory filterbank. SVOS final report, APU: 2341, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.D. Patterson and B.C. Moore. Auditory filters and excitation patterns as representations of frequency resolution. In B.C. Moore, editor, Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, pages 123–177. Academic Press, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.D. Patterson, M. Unoki, and T. Irino. Extending the domain of center frequencies for the compressive gammachirp auditory filter. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 114(3):1529–1542, 2003.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J.O. Pickles. The neurophysiological basis of frequency selectivity. In B.C. Moore, editor, Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, pages 51–121. Academic Press, London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Seeber. Software on masking and critical bands. www.acoustics. bseeber.de.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. van de Par and A. Kohlrausch. Dependence of binaural masking level differences on center frequency, masker bandwidth, and interaural parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106(4):1940–1947, 1999.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. L.L.M. Vogten. Low-level pure-tone masking: a comparison of “tuning curves” obtained with simultaneous and forward masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63(5):1520–1527, 1978.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. H. von Helmholtz. Die Lehre von der Tonempfindung als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig, 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.L. Wegel and C.E. Lane. The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and its probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Phys. Rev., 23(2):43–56, 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Zwicker. Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (Frequenzgruppen). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 33(3):248, 1961.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Zwicker. Temporal effects in simultaneous masking by white-noise bursts. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 37:653–663, 1965.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. E. Zwicker and H. Fastl. Psychoacoustics, Facts and Models. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2nd edition, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. Zwicker and A. Jaroszewski. Inverse frequency dependence of simultaneous tone-on-tone masking patterns at low levels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 71(6):1508–1512, 1982.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. E. Zwicker and E. Terhardt. Analytical expressions for critical band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 68(6):1523–1525, 1980.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seeber, B.U. (2008). Masking and Critical Bands. In: Havelock, D., Kuwano, S., Vorländer, M. (eds) Handbook of Signal Processing in Acoustics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30441-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics