Skip to main content

Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance

  • Chapter
Preventing Crime

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armitage, Rachel. 2002. To CCTV or Not? A Review of Current Research into the Effectiveness of CCTV Systems in Reducing Crime. London, England: National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Graham Smyth, and Ken Pease. 1999. “Burnley CCTV Evaluation.” In Surveillance of Public Space: CCTV, Street Lighting and Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 10, edited by Kate Painter and Nick Tilley, 225–250. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Ben. 1995. CCTV in Town Centres: Three Case Studies. Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper, No. 68. London, England: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, John N. 1980. “Closed Circuit Television on the London Underground.” In Designing Out Crime, edited by Ronald V.G. Clarke and Patricia Mayhew, 75–83. London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Ronald V. 1995. “Situational Crime Prevention.” In Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 19, edited by Michael Tonry and David P. Farrington, 91–150. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. Effective Crime Prevention: Keeping Pace with New Developments. Forum on Crime and Society 1: 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and Ross Homel. 1997. “A Revised Classification of Situational Crime Prevention Techniques.” In Crime Prevention at a Crossroads, edited by Steven P. Lab, 17–27. Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Ronald V., and David Weisburd. 1994. “Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits: Observations on the Reverse of Displacement.” In Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 2, edited by Ronald V. Clarke, 165–183. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Thomas D., and Donald T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, Jason, and Emma Short. 1999. “Yes, ItWorks, No, It Doesn’t: Comparing the Effects of Open-Street CCTV in Two Adjacent Scottish Town Centres.” In Surveillance of Public Space: CCTV, Street Lighting and Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 10, edited by Kate Painter and Nick Tilley, 201–224. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, John E. 1997. “Preventing Crime at Places.” In Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising, Lawrence W. Sherman, Denise C. Gottfredson, Doris L. MacKenzie, John E. Eck, Peter Reuter, and Shawn D. Bushway, chapter 7. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “Preventing Crime at Places.” In Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, edited by Lawrence W. Sherman, David P. Farrington, Brandon C. Welsh, and Doris L. MacKenzie, 241–294. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, David P., Martin Gill, Sam J. Waples, and Javier Argomaniz. 2005a. Studying the Effects of CCTV on Crime: Meta-Analysis of a National Evaluation. Unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, David P., Trevor H. Bennett, and Brandon C. Welsh. 2005b. The Cambridge Evaluation of the Effects of CCTV on Crime. In Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honor of Ken Pease. Crime Prevention Studies, edited by Graham Farrell. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, David P., and Kate A. Painter. 2003. How to Evaluate the Impact of CCTV on Crime. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 5: 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandmaison, Rachel, and Pierre Tremblay. 1997. Évaluation des Effets de la Teélé-Surveillance sur la Criminalité Commise dans 13 Stations du Métro de Montréal. Criminologie 30: 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office Policing and Reducing Crime Unit. 2001. Invitation to T ender: Evaluation of CCTV Initiatives. Unpublished document. London, England: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Hayley E. 2005. Measuring Effect Size in Area-Based Crime Prevention Research. Unpublished M.Phil. thesis. Cambridge, England: Statistical Laboratory, Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Brigitte C.M. 1998. The Politics of Crime Prevention. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, Lorraine, David C. Hurley, and Mitchell Chamlin. 2002. Social Behavior in Public Space: An Analysis of Behavioral Adaptations to CCTV. Security Journal 15: 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Dean E. 2002. “As Security Cameras Sprout, Someone’s AlwaysWatching.” New York Times, 29 September, pp. 1, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musheno, Michael C., James P. Levine, and Denis J. Palumbo. 1978. Television Surveillance and Crime Prevention: Evaluating an Attempt to Create Defensible Space in Public Housing. Social Science Quarterly 58: 647–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, Marcus. 1997. Public Video Surveillance: Is It an Effective Crime Prevention Tool? Sacramento, CA: California Research Bureau, California State Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Clive, and Gary Armstrong. 1999. The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV. Oxford, England: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Coretta. 1999. “A Review of CCTV Evaluations: Crime Reduction Effects and Attitudes Towards Its Use.” In Surveillance of Public Space: CCTV, Street Lighting and Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 10, edited by Kate Painter and Nick Tilley, 123–155. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, Alex R., David P. Farrington, and Alfred Blumstein. 2003. “The Criminal Career Paradigm.” In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 30, edited by Michael Tonry, 359–506. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poyner, Barry. 1991. Situational Crime Prevention in Two Parking Facilities. Security Journal 2: 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “What Works in Crime Prevention: An Overview of Evaluations.” In Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 1, edited by Ronald V. Clarke, 185–193. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, Christopher. 1996. “The Impact of Closed Circuit Television on Crime in Sutton Town Centre.” In Towards a Safer Sutton? CCTV One Year On, edited by Marjorie Bulos and Duncan Grant, 13–49. London, England: London Borough of Sutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, William R., Thomas D. Cook, and Donald T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinns, David. 1998. Doncaster CCTV Surveillance System: Second Annual Report of the Independent Evaluation. Doncaster, England: Faculty of Business and Professional Studies, Doncaster College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, Peter. 1998. An Evaluation of the Ilford Town Centre CCTV Scheme. Brighton, England: Health and Social Policy Research Centre, University of Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, Nick. 1993. Understanding Car Parks, Crime and CCTV: Evaluation Lessons from Safer Cities. Crime Prevention Unit Series Paper, No. 42. London, England: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Barry, and Gloria Laycock. 1992. Reducing Crime on the London Underground: An Evaluation of Three Pilot Projects. Crime Prevention Unit Series Paper, No. 30. London, England: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, Brandon C., and David P. Farrington. 1999. Value for Money? A Review of the Costs and Benefits of Situational Crime Prevention. British Journal of Criminology 39: 345–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. “Monetary Costs and Benefits of Crime Prevention Programs.” In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 27, edited by Michael Tonry, 305–361. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. Crime Prevention Effects of Closed Circuit Television: A Systematic Review. Home Office Research Study, No. 252. London, England: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Douglas, and Sara McLafferty. 2000. “The Effects of CCTV on Crime in Public Housing: An Application of GIS and Spatial Statistics.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, November.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Welsh, B.C., Farrington, D.P. (2006). Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance. In: Welsh, B.C., Farrington, D.P. (eds) Preventing Crime. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4244-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics