Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Democratic Control of Armed Forces

Relevance, Issues, and Research Agenda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of the Military

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Basically, the subject of the democratic control of armed forces refers to the question “Who guards the guards?” This enduring question was raised as far back as in classical Rome by Juvenal.1 Democracy always implicitly presumes unlimited civilian supremacy over the command of the armed forces-anything short of that defines an incomplete democracy (Luttwak, 1999). But what exactly is democratic control, and how can we conceptualize it? Generally speaking, a state’s system of democratic control is a product of its system of government, politics, history, and culture. Aditionally, as there are many different cultures and political systems, many different norms and practices of democratic control also exist. Consequently, and for better or worse, there is no single, definitive normative model for democratic control. At least several models are present, some of which appear to contradict others. The main question of this chapter is “How can democratic control be conceptualized?” The following questions relating to the issue are addressed: (1) What is democratic control?, (2) What is the relevance of democratic control?, (3) How can democratic control be achieved?, (4) What are specific problems of democratic control?, and (5) How can democratic control be studied?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ’sed quis custodiet ipsos custodies?’, Juvenal, Omnia Romae, VI, p. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ministry of Defense, White Paper on Defense of the Czech Republic, Prague, 1995, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pelle and Van Schendelen, Problems of Control in Constitutional Law. Rotterdam: Erasmus University, dissertation, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stefan Sarvas, The shift from the transitional to democratic agenda: Problems and future of democratic control of armed forces in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the ERGOMAS conference in Stockholm (1998), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chris Donnelly, “Defence transformation in the new democracies: A framework for tackling the problem”, in NATO-review, 1, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrew Cottey et al., Civil-military relations in Central and Eastern Europe: Democratic control of the armed forces in Central and Eastern Europe, a framework for understanding civil-military relation, University of Nottingham, 1999 (available at: www.nottingham.ac.uk/politics/civil-military/Overview/theoretical%20Framework.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Juergen Kuhlmann and Jean Callaghan, About the primacy of politics over military matters: (West-) Germany’s approach of integrating the ‘Bundeswehr’ into democracy. Dissertation, 2000, p. 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biljana Vankovska, NATO war over Yugoslavia: Civilian control in focues. Research paper of the Copenhague Peace Research Institute (2000) (available at: www.copri.dk).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, for example, Edward N. Luttwak, 1999, op. cit., p. 99. Or see R. Dahl, On Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Samuel Huntington, 1957, op. cit., p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hans Born and Max Metselaar, “Politiek-militaire betrekkingen (Political-military relations),” in Hans Born, Rene Moelker, and Joseph Soeters (eds.), Krijgsmacht en samenleving: Klassieke en eigentijds inzichten (Military and society: Classical and contemporary viewpoints), Tilburg: University Press, 1999, p. 87. See also: Peter D. Feaver, Delegation, monitoring and civilian control of the military: Agency theory and American civil-military relations, Cambridge, MA: John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies at Harvard University, 1996, pp. 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hans Born and Max Metselaar, “Politiek-militaire betrekkingen (Political-military relations),” in Hans Born, Rene Moelker, and Joseph Soeters (eds.), Krijgsmacht en samenleving: Klassieke en eigentijds inzichten (Military and society: Classical and contemporary viewpoints), Tilburg: University Press, 1999 op. cit., pp. 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stefan Sarvas, 1998, “Politiek-militaire betrekkingen (Political-military relations),” in Hans Born, Rene Moelker, and Joseph Soeters (eds.), Krijgsmacht en samenleving: Klassieke en eigentijds inzichten (Military and society: Classical and contemporary viewpoints), Tilburg: University Press op. cit., p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karl Haltiner, Civil-military relations: separation or concordance? The case of Switzerland. Paper presented at the ERGOMAS interim meeting, Birmingham, 1999, p. 4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karl Haltiner, op. cit., p. 5. The commander in chief is called a “general-elect.”

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morris Janowitz, op. cit., p. 420

    Google Scholar 

  17. Constantine Danopoulos, “Introduction,” in Constantine Danopoulos and Daniel Zirker, (eds.), The military and society in the former Eastern bloc. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999, pp. 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rudolf Joo, “Introduction,” in Constantine Danopoulos and Daniel Zirker, (eds.), The military and society in the former Eastern bloc. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999 op. cit., p. 5

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hans Born and Max Metselaar, 1999, “Introduction,” in Constantine Danopoulos and Daniel Zirker, (eds.), The military and society in the former Eastern bloc. Boulder, CO: Westview Press op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hans Born (2000), “Introduction,” in Constantine Danopoulos and Daniel Zirker, (eds.), The military and society in the former Eastern bloc. Boulder, CO: Westview Press op. cit., pp. 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hans Born (2000), “Introduction,” in Constantine Danopoulos and Daniel Zirker, (eds.), The military and society in the former Eastern bloc. Boulder, CO: Westview Press op. cit., pp. 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bland, “Introduction,” in Constantine Danopoulos and Daniel Zirker, (eds.), The military and society in the former Eastern bloc. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999 op. cit., pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Based on Huntington (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Based on Michael Howard (1957). Soldiers and Governments: Nine Studies in Civil-Military Relations. London: Eyre and Spottiswood, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bernard Boëne and Christopher Dandeker (2000). “Armed forces, state and society in Sweden: a view from a wider European perspective,” in Christopher Dandeker and Alice Weibull (eds.), Facing Uncertainty: Report No. 2, 2000. Karlstad.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hans Born (2000), “Armed forces, state and society in Sweden: a view from a wider European perspective,” in Christopher Dandeker and Alice Weibull (eds.), Facing Uncertainty: Report No. 2 op. cit., pp. 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bram Peper (1999). Op zoek naar samenhang en richting: een essay over de veranderende houding tussen overheid en samenleving (In search of coherence and direction: an essay on the changing relation between state and society). [Available at: www.nrc.nl (July 12, 1999).]

    Google Scholar 

  28. Max Weber, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Crince le Roy (1976). De Vierde Macht: Een Hernieuwde Kennismaking (The Fourth Might: A Renewed Introduction). Den Haag: VUGA.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ed van Tijn et al. (1998). De Sorry-Democratie: Recente Politieke Affaires en de Ministriële Verantwoordelijkheid. Amsterdam: Van Gennip, pp. 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hans Born and Max Metselaar, 1999, op. cit., p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Associated Press, Monday February 28, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Letter of the Dutch Prime Minister, Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Minister of Defense to the Chairman of the Parliament concerning the Evaluation of the Kosovo crisis, March 22, 2000, pp. 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shaw, M. (2000). “The contemporary mode of warfare? Mary Kaldor’s theory of new wars,” In Revieiv of International Political Economy, 7(1), pp. 171–180. (Available at: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/hafa3/kaldor.htm.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces, Geneva, Switzerland, CH-1205

    Hans Born

Authors
  1. Hans Born
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Italian Interuniversity Centre of Historical and Military Studies, Via S. Antonio 58, 56125, Pisa, Italy

    Giuseppe Caforio

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Born, H. (2006). Democratic Control of Armed Forces. In: Caforio, G. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34576-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation