Abstract
Even if the sociology of the military became firmly established and, especially, demonstrated its applicability to concrete cases starting with the vast research of The American Soldier (see “The American School” below), sociological investigation of the military and of the phenomenon of war preceded it by nearly a century, and was contemporaneous with the first studies commonly considered sociological. Seeking out these roots is not merely an operation of historical interest: Those starting out on the study of this special sociology need to know the paths that have already been trod, of which some came to an end and others produced studies and researches of what we consider contemporary sociology of the military (from The American Soldier onward). Our discipline did not develop in some sort of cosmic vacuum, emerging from nothing, but embraced previous contributions to thought and research and very often carried them further. To give just a pair of examples, Samuel Huntington and Morris Janowitz (see below) offered their own solutions to the convergence/divergence dichotomy between the armed forces and civil society already evidenced by Alexis de Tocqueville in the 19th century, while Charles Wright Mills’s model of the “power elite” is clearly indebted to the studies of Gaetano Mosca at the end of the 19th century. Some knowledge of the thought of those I call the “forerunners” here is important, therefore, especially for the novice, in order to build a more complete and broad mental framework of the discipline than would result from study of contemporary sociology of the military only.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Comte’s fundamental work, in six volumes, published between 1830 and 1842. The edition I refer to is the one published by UTET, Turin, 1967, edited by Franco Ferrarotti.
Understood as history without the names of individuals and even without those of peoples, op. cit., p. 123.
Op. cit., Lecture LIII, p. 551.
Op. cit., Lecture LV, pp. 77–81.
Op. cit., Lecture LVII, p. 430.
In De la democratic en Amérique, published between 1836 and 1839. The edition I refer to is the one by Gallimard, Paris, 1951.
Op. cit., p. 270.
Op. cit., pp. 275–276.
Principles of Sociology, published in three volumes from 1877 to 1896. The edition I refer to here is Principi di sociologia, published by UTET, Turin, 1967, edited by Franco Ferrarotti.
Mosca treats the military especially in Chapter 9 of Volume I of The Ruling Class (see References), titled “Standing Armies.”
Op. cit., Vol. I, p. 330.
See References, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft.
See Elton Mayo, The Human Problems of Industrial Civilisation, New York, 1933.
See References, The Decline of the Mass Army.
See References, The Power Elite.
See References, Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates.
Among whom Zeb Bradford and F. Brown (1973), Amos Jordan and William Taylor (1973), Edwin Deagle (1973), William Taylor and Donald Bletz (1974) (see References).
See References, The American Enlisted Man: The Rank and File in Today’s Military.
The model is first enunciated by Moskos at a conference of the Inter-University Seminar in Alabama in 1976, later published in the article “From Institution to Occupation: Trends in Military Organization” in Armed Forces and Society, vol. 4, No. 1/1977, pp. 41–50. A subsequent reelaboration was presented in “Institutional and Occupational Trends in Armed Forces: An Update” in Armed Forces and Society, 12(3), 1986, pp. 377–382.
See, for example, under References, G. Caforio, The Military Profession: Theories of Change.
See References; in “Armed Forces and Society,” published together with Gwyn Harries-Jenkins in Current Sociology, 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caforio, G. (2006). Some Historical Notes. In: Caforio, G. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34576-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34576-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32456-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34576-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)