Skip to main content

Some Historical Notes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of the Military

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Even if the sociology of the military became firmly established and, especially, demonstrated its applicability to concrete cases starting with the vast research of The American Soldier (see “The American School” below), sociological investigation of the military and of the phenomenon of war preceded it by nearly a century, and was contemporaneous with the first studies commonly considered sociological. Seeking out these roots is not merely an operation of historical interest: Those starting out on the study of this special sociology need to know the paths that have already been trod, of which some came to an end and others produced studies and researches of what we consider contemporary sociology of the military (from The American Soldier onward). Our discipline did not develop in some sort of cosmic vacuum, emerging from nothing, but embraced previous contributions to thought and research and very often carried them further. To give just a pair of examples, Samuel Huntington and Morris Janowitz (see below) offered their own solutions to the convergence/divergence dichotomy between the armed forces and civil society already evidenced by Alexis de Tocqueville in the 19th century, while Charles Wright Mills’s model of the “power elite” is clearly indebted to the studies of Gaetano Mosca at the end of the 19th century. Some knowledge of the thought of those I call the “forerunners” here is important, therefore, especially for the novice, in order to build a more complete and broad mental framework of the discipline than would result from study of contemporary sociology of the military only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Comte’s fundamental work, in six volumes, published between 1830 and 1842. The edition I refer to is the one published by UTET, Turin, 1967, edited by Franco Ferrarotti.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Understood as history without the names of individuals and even without those of peoples, op. cit., p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Op. cit., Lecture LIII, p. 551.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Op. cit., Lecture LV, pp. 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Op. cit., Lecture LVII, p. 430.

    Google Scholar 

  6. In De la democratic en Amérique, published between 1836 and 1839. The edition I refer to is the one by Gallimard, Paris, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Op. cit., p. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Op. cit., pp. 275–276.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Principles of Sociology, published in three volumes from 1877 to 1896. The edition I refer to here is Principi di sociologia, published by UTET, Turin, 1967, edited by Franco Ferrarotti.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mosca treats the military especially in Chapter 9 of Volume I of The Ruling Class (see References), titled “Standing Armies.”

    Google Scholar 

  11. Op. cit., Vol. I, p. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See References, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Elton Mayo, The Human Problems of Industrial Civilisation, New York, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See References, The Decline of the Mass Army.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See References, The Power Elite.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See References, Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Among whom Zeb Bradford and F. Brown (1973), Amos Jordan and William Taylor (1973), Edwin Deagle (1973), William Taylor and Donald Bletz (1974) (see References).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See References, The American Enlisted Man: The Rank and File in Today’s Military.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The model is first enunciated by Moskos at a conference of the Inter-University Seminar in Alabama in 1976, later published in the article “From Institution to Occupation: Trends in Military Organization” in Armed Forces and Society, vol. 4, No. 1/1977, pp. 41–50. A subsequent reelaboration was presented in “Institutional and Occupational Trends in Armed Forces: An Update” in Armed Forces and Society, 12(3), 1986, pp. 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See, for example, under References, G. Caforio, The Military Profession: Theories of Change.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See References; in “Armed Forces and Society,” published together with Gwyn Harries-Jenkins in Current Sociology, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caforio, G. (2006). Some Historical Notes. In: Caforio, G. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34576-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics